Development of multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) and least square support vector machine (LSSVM) models to predict Nusselt number and pressure drop of TiO₂/water nanofluid flows through non-straight pathways

References

• K. Narrein and H. A. Mohammed, “Heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics in helically coiled tube heat exchanger (HCTHE) using nanofluids: a review,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., vol. 11, pp. 911–927, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S. Vashisth, V. Kumar, and K. D. P. Nigam, “A review on the potential applications of curved geometries in process industry,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3291–3337, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kahani, S. Zeinali Heris, and S. M. Mousavi, “Multiwalled carbon nanotube/water nanofluid or helical coiling technique, which of them is more effective?” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 52, no. 36, pp. 13183–13191, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Grindley, and A. H. Gibson, “On the frictional resistance of air through a pipe,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser., vol. 80, no. 536, pp. 114–139, 1908.
   Google Scholar
• D. Jeschke, “Heat transfer and pressure loss in coiled pipes,” Ergaenzungsheft Z Ver Disch Ing., vol. 68, pp. 24–28, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• G. Huminic and A. Huminic. “Heat transfer and flow characteristics of conventional fluids and nanofluids in curved tubes: a review,” Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., vol. 58, pp. 1327–1347, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Rainieri, F. Bozzoli, L. Cattani, and G. Pagliarini, “Compound convective heat transfer enhancement in helically coiled wall corrugated tubes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 59, pp. 353–362, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. X. Lin and M. A. Ebadian, “Condensation heat transfer and pressure drop of R134a in annular helicoidal pipe at different orientations,” Int J Heat Mass Transf., vol. 50, no. 21–22, pp. 4256–4264, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Naphon, “Thermal performance and pressure drop of the helical-coil heat exchangers with and without helically crimped fin,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 321–330, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Shokouhmand and M. R. Salimpour, “Optimal Reynolds number of laminar forced convection in a helical tube subjected to uniform wall temperature,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 753–761, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zachár, “Investigation of natural convection induced outer side heat transfer rate of coiled-tube heat exchangers,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 55, no. 25–26, pp. 7892–7901, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Beigzadeh and M. Rahimi, “Prediction of thermal and fluid flow characteristics in helically coiled tubes using ANFIS and GA based correlations,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1647–1653, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kumar, S. S. Sonawane, and S. H. Sonawane, “Experimental study of thermal conductivity, heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 based nanofluid,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 90, pp. 1–10, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kahani, S. Zeinali Heris, and S. M. Mousavi, “Comparative study between metal oxide nanopowders on thermal characteristics of nanofluid flow through helical coils,” Powder Technol., vol. 246, pp. 82–92, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Gholami, B. Vaferi, and M. A. Ariana, “Prediction of viscosity of several alumina-based nanofluids using various artificial intelligence paradigms - Comparison with experimental data and empirical correlations,” Powder Technol., vol. 323, pp. 495–506, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Nikkam and M. S. Toprak, “Fabrication and thermo-physical characterization of silver nanofluids: An experimental investigation on the effect of base liquid,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 91, pp. 196–200, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kahani and G. H. Vatankhah, “Thermal performance prediction of wickless heat pipe with Al2O3/water nanofluid using artificial neural network,” Chem. Eng. Commun., 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2018.1505614.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kahani, H. S. Zeinali, and S. M. Mousavi, “Experimental investigation of TiO2/water nanofluid droplet impingement on nano-structured surfaces,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2230–2224, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kahani, S. Zeinali Heris, and S. M. Mousavi, “Experimental investigation of TiO2/water nanofluid laminar forced convective heat transfer through helical coiled tube,” Heat Mass Transf., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1563–1573, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Taghizadeh-Tabari, S. Zeinali Heris, M. Moradi, and M. Kahani, “The study on application of TiO2/water nanofluid in plate heat exchanger of milk pasteurization industries,” Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., vol. 58, pp. 1318–1326, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Akhavan-Behabadi, M. Fakoor-Pakdaman, and M. Ghazvini, “Experimental investigation on the convective heat transfer of nanofluid flow inside vertical helically coiled tubes under uniform wall temperature condition,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 556–564, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. A. Mohammed and K. Narrein, “Thermal and hydraulic characteristics of nanofluid flow in a helically coiled tube heat exchanger,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1375–1383, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Hashemi and M. A. Akhavan-Behabadi, “An empirical study on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of CuO–base oil nanofluid flow in a horizontal helically coiled tube under constant heat flux,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bahremand, A. Abbassi, and M. Saffar-Avval, “Experimental and numerical investigation of turbulent nanofluid flow in helically coiled tubes under constant wall heat flux using Eulerian–Lagrangian approach,” Powder Technol., vol. 269, pp. 93–100, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Akbaridoust, M. Rakhsha, A. Abbassi, and M. Saffar-Avval, “Experimental and numerical investigation of nanofluid heat transfer in helically coiled tubes at constant wall temperature using dispersion model,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 58, no. 1–2, pp. 480–491, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Safari, M. Saffar-Avval, and E. Amani, “Numerical investigation of turbulent forced convection flow of nanofluid in curved and helical pipe using four-equation model,” Powder Technol., vol. 328, pp. 47–53, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Huminic and A. Huminic, “Heat transfer characteristics in double tube helical heat exchangers using nanofluids,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 54, no. 19–20, pp. 4280–4287, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. Shirvan, M. Mamourian, S. Mirzakhanlari, and R. Ellahi, “Numerical investigation of heat exchanger effectiveness in a double pipe heat exchanger filled with nanofluid: a sensitivity analysis by response surface methodology,” Powder Technol., vol. 313, pp. 99–111, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, M. A. Ahmadi, S. A. Sadatsakkak, and M. Feidt, “Connectionist intelligent model estimates output power and torque of stirling engine,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 50, pp. 871–883, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, M.-A. Ahmadi, M. Mehrpooya, and M. A. Rosen, “Using GMDH neural networks to model the power and torque of a stirling engine,” Sustainability, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2243–2255, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Pourkiaei, M. H. Ahmadi, and S. M. Hasheminejad, “Modeling and experimental verification of a 25W fabricated PEM fuel cell by parametric and GMDH-type neural network,” Mech. Indus., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 105, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Toghyani, M. H. Ahmadi, A. Kasaeian, and A. H. Mohammadi, “Artificial neural network, ANN-PSO and ANN-ICA for modelling the stirling engine,” Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 456–468, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, M. A. Ahmadi, M. Ashouri, F. Razie Astaraei, R. Ghasempour, and F. Aloui, “Prediction of performance of stirling engine using least squares support machine technique,” Mech. Indus., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 506, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kasaeian, M. Mehrpooya, M. Aghaie, and M. H. Ahmadi, “Solar radiation prediction based on Ica and HGAPSO for Kuhin city, Iran,” Mech. Indus., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 509, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kasaeian, M. Ghalamchi, M. H. Ahmadi, and M. Ghalamchi, “GMDH algorithm for modeling the outlet temperatures of a solar chimney based on the ambient temperature,” Mech. Indus., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 216, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, M. Alhuyi Nazari, R. Ghasempour, H. Madah, M. B. Shafii, and M. A. Ahmadi, “Thermal conductivity ratio prediction of Al2O3/water nanofluid by applying connectionist methods,” Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp., vol. 541, pp. 154–164, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2018.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, S. Sorouri Ghare Aghaj, and A. Nazeri, “Prediction of power in solar stirling heat engine by using neural network based on hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1141–1150, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Ahmadi, M. A. Ahmadi, M. A. Nazari, O. Mahian, and R. Ghasempour, “A proposed model to predict thermal conductivity ratio of Al2O3/EG nanofluid by applying least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) and genetic algorithm as a connectionist approach,” J. Thermal Anal. Calorim., pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7035-z.
   Google Scholar
• D. A. Drew and S. L. Passman, Theory of Multi Component Fluids, 1st ed., Heidelberg: Springer, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• A. Einstein, Investigation on Theory of Brownian Motion, 1st ed., New York: Dover, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• H. C. Brinkman, “The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions,” Chem. Phys., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 571, 1952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. J. Wasp, J. P. Kenny, and R. L. Gandhi, “Solid-liquid flow: slurry pipeline transportation [Pumps, valves, mechanical equipment, economics].” Ser. Bulk Mater. Handl. (United States). vol. 1, no. 4, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• M. W. Gardner and S. R. Dorling, “Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences” Atmos. Environ., vol. 32, no. 14–15, pp. 2627–2636, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, “Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators,” Neural Networks, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 359–366, 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Orhan, M. Hekim, and M. Ozer, “EEG signals classification using the K-means clustering and a multilayer perceptron neural network model,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 13475–13481, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. W. Ruck, S. K. Rogers, M. Kabrisky, M. E. Oxley, and B. W. Suter, “The multilayer perceptron as an approximation to a Bayes optimal discriminant function,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 296–298, 1990.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. Vanzella et al., “Photometric redshifts with the multilayer perceptron neural network: application to the HDF-S and SDSS,” A&A, vol. 423, no. 2, pp. 761–776, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Goda, E.-M. Shokir, M. Eissa, K. A. Fattah, and M. H. Sayyouh, “Prediction of the PVT data using neural network computing theory,” In Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Mach. Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. D. Übeyli, “Least squares support vector machine employing model-based methods coefficients for analysis of EEG signals,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, pp. 233–239, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Van Gestel et al., “Benchmarking least squares support vector machine classifiers,” Mach. Learning, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2004,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Pelckmans et al., “LS-SVMlab: a matlab/c toolbox for least squares support vector machines, tutorial. KULeuven-ESAT. Leuven,” Belgium, vol. 142, pp. 1–2, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. Shokrollahi, A. Tatar, F. Gharagheizi, A. H. Mohammadi, and A. Naseri, “Reservoir oil viscosity determination using a rigorous approach,” Fuel, vol. 116, pp. 39–48, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Suykens, T. Van Gestel, and J. De Brabanter, Least Squares Support Vector Machines, Singapore: World Scientific, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wang and D. Hu, “Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for regression,”. In International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain. ICNN&B'05. IEEE. 2005, vol. 1, pp. 279–283.
   Google Scholar
• S. Rafiee-Taghanaki, M. Arabloo, A. Chamkalani, M. Amani, M. H. Zargari, and M. R. Adelzadeh, “Implementation of SVM framework to estimate PVT properties of reservoir oil,” Fluid Phase Equil., vol. 346, pp. 25–32, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Shokrollahi, M. Arabloo, F. Gharagheizi, and A. H. Mohammadi, “Intelligent model for prediction of CO2–reservoir oil minimum miscibility pressure,” Fuel, vol. 112, pp. 375–384, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. V. Gestel, J. A. Suykens, G. Lanckriet, A. Lambrechts, B. D. Moor, and J. Vandewalle, “Bayesian framework for least-squares support vector machine classifiers, Gaussian processes, and kernel fisher discriminant analysis,” Neural Computation, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1115–1147, 2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Najafi-Marghmaleki, A. Barati-Harooni, A. Tatar, A. Mohebbi, and A. H. Mohammadi, “On the prediction of Watson characterization factor of hydrocarbons,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 231, pp. 419–429, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Shayeghi and A. Ghasemi, “Day-ahead electricity prices forecasting by a modified CGSA technique and hybrid WT in LSSVM based scheme,” Energy Conversion Manag., vol. 74, pp. 482–491, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-K. Chan and Y.-C. Tsai, “Multiple regression approach to predict turbine-generator output for chinshan nuclear power plant,” Kerntechnik, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tatar et al., “Implementing radial basis function neural networks for prediction of saturation pressure of crude oils,” Petroleum Sci. Technol., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 454–463, 2016.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tatar, A. Barati-Harooni, M. Partovi, A. Najafi-Marghmaleki, and A. H. Mohammadi, “An accurate model for predictions of vaporization enthalpies of hydrocarbons and petroleum fractions,” J. Mol. Liq. vol. 220, pp. 192–199, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tatar et al., “Prediction of water removal rate in a natural gas dehydration system using radial basis function neural network,” Petroleum Sci. Technol., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 951–960, 2016.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Cybenko, “Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function,” Math. Control Signal Syst., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 303–314, 1989.
   Google Scholar