Benchmarked simulations of natural convection airflow in a square cavity

References

• K.-O. Lim, K.-S. Lee, and T.-H. Song, “Primary and secondary instabilities in a glass-melting surface,” Numer. Heat Transf. A: Appl., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 309–325, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Reeve, A. M. Mescher, and A. F. Emery, “Investigation of steady-state drawing force and heat transfer in polymer optical fiber manufacturing,” J. Heat Transf., vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 236–243, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Reeve and A. M. Mescher, “Effect of unsteady natural convection on the diameter of drawn polymer optical fiber,” Opt. Express, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 1770–1779, 2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Xamán, G. Álvarez, L. Lira, and C. Estrada, “Numerical study of heat transfer by laminar and turbulent natural convection in tall cavities of facade elements,” Energy Build., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 787–794, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Pasut and M. De Carli, “Evaluation of various CFD modelling strategies in predicting airflow and temperature in a naturally ventilated double skin façade,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 37, pp. 267–274, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Samanes, J. Garcia-Barberena, and F. Zaversky, “Modeling solar cavity receivers: A review and comparison of natural convection heat loss correlations,” Energy Proc., vol. 69, pp. 543–552, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• H. Bhowmik and K. W. Tou, “Experimental study of transient natural convection heat transfer from simulated electronic chips,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 485–492, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and G. E. Schneider, “Thermobuoyancy treatment for electronic packaging using an improved advection scheme,” J. Electron. Packag., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. D. Gray and A. Giorgini, “The validity of the Boussinesq approximation for liquids and gases,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 545–551, 1976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. C. Martineau et al., “Comparison of natural convection flows under VHTR type conditions modeled by both the conservation and incompressible forms of the Navier–Stokes equations,” Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 240, no. 6, pp. 1371–1385, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Paillere and P. Le Quéré, “Modelling and simulation of natural convection flows with large temperature differences: A benchmark problem for low Mach number solvers,” 12th Séminaire de Mécanique Des Fluides Numérique, CEA Saclay, France, 2000, pp. 25–26.
   Google Scholar
• P. Le Quéré et al., “Modelling of natural convection flows with large temperature differences: A benchmark problem for low Mach number solvers. Part 1. Reference solutions,” ESAIM: M2AN, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 609–616, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• H. Paillère et al., “Modelling of natural convection flows with large temperature differences: A benchmark problem for low Mach number solvers. Part 2. Contributions to the June 2004 conference,” ESAIM: M2AN, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 617–621, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• E. Turkel, “Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 277–298, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Weiss and W. A. Smith, “Preconditioning applied to variable and constant density flows,” AIAA J., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2050–2057, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• A. G. Tomboulides and S. A. Orzag, “A quasi-two-dimensional benchmark problem for low Mach number compressible codes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 691–706, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Paulucci, “On the Filtering of Sound from the Navier–Stokes Equations, Sandia National Labs,” Technical Report, Sandia National Laboratories, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• H. Paillere, C. Viozat, A. Kumbaro, and I. Toumi, “Comparison of low Mach number models for natural convection problems,” Heat Mass Transf., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 567–573, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. H. Harlow and A. A. Amsden, “Numerical calculation of almost incompressible flow,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• S. Acharya et al., “Pressure-based finite-volume methods in computational fluid dynamics,” J. Heat Transf., vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 407–424, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. J. Keshtiban, F. Belblidia, and M. F. Webster, “Compressible flow solvers for low Mach number flows—A review,” Inst. of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Univ. of Wales, Swansea, Wales, UK, 2004. Available: http://www.cs.swan.ac.uk/reports/yr2004/CSR2-2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CD-adapco, S. STAR CCM + User Guide Version 12.04. New York, NY, USA: CD-Adapco, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS. Academic Research Mechanical and CFD, Release 18.0, Help System, Fluent Theory Guide, Solver Theory. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• The OpenFOAM Foundation. About OpenFOAM. [Online]. Available: https://cfd.direct/openfoam/about/. Accessed Nov. 4, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• S. Patankar and D. Spalding, “A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1787–1806, 1972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Moukalled, L. Mangani, and M. Darwish, The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics: An Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM® and Matlab®. Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications; vol. 113. Cham: Springer, 2016,
   Google Scholar
• P. J. Roache, “Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 123–160, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar