A high-resolution Navier–Stokes solver for direct numerical simulation of free shear flow

References

• X. Jiang and C.-H. Lai, Numerical Techniques for Direct and Large-Eddy Simulations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• O. Ubbink, and R. Issa, “A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 26–50, 1999. DOI:10.1006/jcph.1999.6276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-H. Lin, and C. Lin, “Simple high-order bounded convection scheme to model discontinuities,” AIAA J., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 563–565, 1997. DOI:10.2514/3.13541.
   Google Scholar
• X.-D. Liu, S. Osher, and T. Chan, “Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 200–212, 1994. DOI:10.1006/jcph.1994.1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.-S. Jiang, and C.-W. Shu, “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 202–228, 1996. DOI:10.1006/jcph.1996.0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Tafti, “Comparison of some upwind-biased high-order formulations with a second-order Central-difference scheme for time integration of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 647–665, 1996. DOI:10.1016/0045-7930(96)00015-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Shen, G. Zha, and X. Chen, “High order conservative differencing for viscous terms and the application to vortex-induced vibration flows,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 22, pp. 8283–8300, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. He, “A high order finite difference solver for massively parallel simulations of stably stratified turbulent channel flows,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 127, pp. 161–173, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zinjala, and J. Banerjee, “A Lagrangian-Eulerian volume-tracking with linearity-preserving interface reconstruction,” Numer. Heat Transf. B Fund., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 459–478, 2015. DOI:10.1080/10407790.2015.1036618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Drikakis, and W. Rider, High-resolution Methods for Incompressible and Low-Speed Flows. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kim, P. Moin, and R. Moser, “Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 133–166, 1987. DOI:10.1017/S0022112087000892.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kozuka, Y. Seki, and H. Kawamura, “DNS of turbulent heat transfer in a channel flow with a high spatial resolution,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 514–524, 2009. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Flageul, and I. Tiselj, “Impact of unresolved smaller scales on the scalar dissipation rate in direct numerical simulations of wall bounded flows,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 68, pp. 173–179, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. De Angelis, P. Lombardi, and S. Banerjee, “Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a wavy wall,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2429–2442, 1997. DOI:10.1063/1.869363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Boersma, G. Brethouwer, and F. Nieuwstadt, “A numerical investigation on the effect of the inflow conditions on the self-similar region of a round jet,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 899–909, 1998. DOI:10.1063/1.869626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. B. Gohil, A. K. Saha, and K. Muralidhar, “Numerical study of instability mechanisms in a circular jet at low Reynolds numbers,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 64, pp. 1–18, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. B. Gohil, A. K. Saha, and K. Muralidhar, “Direct numerical simulation of naturally evolving free circular jet,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 111203, 2011. DOI:10.1115/1.4005199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. B. Gohil, A. K. Saha, and K. Muralidhar, “Direct numerical simulation of free and forced square jets,” Int.l J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 52, pp. 169–184, 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. B. Gohil, A. K. Saha, and K. Muralidhar, “Control of flow in forced jets: a comparison of round and square cross sections,” J. Visual., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141–149, 2010. DOI:10.1007/s12650-009-0020-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vreman, “The projection method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations: the pressure near a no-slip wall,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 263, pp. 353–374, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kim, and H. Choi, “Large eddy simulation of a circular jet: effect of inflow conditions on the near field,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 620, pp. 383–411, 2009. DOI:10.1017/S0022112008004722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-W. Shu, and S. Osher, “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 439–471, 1988. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Tkalich, “Derivation of high-order advection–diffusion schemes,” J. Hydroinform., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 149–164, 2006. DOI:10.2166/hydro.2006.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Črnjarić-Žic, S. Maćešić, and B. Crnković, “Efficient implementation of WENO schemes to nonuniform meshes,” Ann. Univ. Ferrara, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 199–215, 2007. DOI:10.1007/s11565-007-0013-1.
   Google Scholar
• R. Smith, and A. Hutton, “The numerical treatment of advection: A performance comparison of current methods,” Numer. Heat Transf. A Appl., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 439–461, 1982. DOI:10.1080/10407798208546996.
   Google Scholar
• P. Roy, N. Anand, and D. Donzis, “A parallel multigrid finite-volume solver on a collocated grid for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations,” Numer. Heat Transf. B Fund., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 376–409, 2015. DOI:10.1080/10407790.2014.985980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.-H. Li, L. Chen, and W.-Q. Tao, “A parallel scalable multigrid method and HOC scheme for anisotropy elliptic problems,” Numer. Heat Transf. B Fund., vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 346–358, 2017. DOI:10.1080/10407790.2017.1293959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Aggarwal, V. H. Gada, and A. Sharma, “Parallelization methodology and performance study for level-set-method-based simulation of a 3–D transient two-phase flow,” Numer. Heat Transf. B Fund., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 327–356, 2013. DOI:10.1080/10407790.2013.771995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Saincher, S. Dave, C. Anghan, and J. Banerjee, “A parallelized inflow-boundary-based numerical tank: Performance on individual SMA nodes,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018), pp. 663–672, Springer, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• A. Michalke, “On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 521–544, 1965. DOI:10.1017/S0022112065001520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. B. da Silva, and O. Métais, “Vortex control of bifurcating jets: a numerical study,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3798–3819, 2002. DOI:10.1063/1.1506922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. C. Babu, and K. Mahesh, “Upstream entrainment in numerical simulations of spatially evolving round jets,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3699–3705, 2004. DOI:10.1063/1.1780548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Bisoi, M. K. Das, S. Roy, and D. K. Patel, “Large eddy simulation of three-dimensional plane turbulent free jet flow,” Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids, vol. 65, pp. 423–439, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Sezai, “Implementation of boundary conditions in pressure-based finite volume methods on unstructured grids,” Numer. Heat Transfer B Fund., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 82–107, 2017. DOI:10.1080/10407790.2017.1338077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Orlanski, “A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 251–269, 1976. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90023-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Taub, H. Lee, S. Balachandar, and S. Sherif, “A direct numerical simulation study of higher order statistics in a turbulent round jet,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 115102, 2013. DOI:10.1063/1.4829045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Walchshofer, H. Steiner, and G. Brenn, “Robust outflow boundary conditions for strongly buoyant turbulent jet flames,” Flow Turbul. Comb., vol. 86, no. 3–4, pp. 713–734, 2011. DOI:10.1007/s10494-010-9308-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Craske, and M. van Reeuwijk, “Robust and accurate open boundary conditions for incompressible turbulent jets and plumes,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 86, pp. 284–297, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Uddin, S. O. Neumann, and B. Weigand, “Heat transfer enhancement by velocity field excitation for an impinging round jet,” Numer. Heat Transf. A Appl., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 811–824, 2016. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2015.1090840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Anghan, S. Dave, S. Saincher, and J. Banerjee, “An accurate open outlet boundary condition for direct numerical simulation of incompressible round jet,” in 7th International and 45th National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (FMFP2018), Mumbai, India, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• J. Hunt, A. Wray, and P. Moin, “Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows,” in Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• T. Leng, R. Ali, J. Hsieh, V. Mashayekhi, and R. Rooholamini, “An empirical study of hyper-threading in high performance computing clusters,” Linux HPC Revol., vol. 45, pp. 1–12, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yuu, K. Ikeda, and T. Umekage, “Flow-field prediction and experimental verification of low reynolds number gas-particle turbulent jets,” Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, vol. 109, pp. 13–27, 1996. DOI:10.1016/0927-7757(95)03470-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Panchapakesan, and J. Lumley, “Turbulence measurements in axisymmetric jets of air and helium. Part 1. Air jet,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 197–223, 1993. DOI:10.1017/S0022112093000096.
   Google Scholar
• C. Bogey, and C. Bailly, “Turbulence and energy budget in a self-preserving round jet: direct evaluation using large eddy simulation,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 627, pp. 129–160, 2009. DOI:10.1017/S0022112009005801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar