An optimized compact reconstruction weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for Degasperis-Procesi equation

References

• H. A. Eschenfelder, Magnetic Bubble Technology. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Cao, D. Sun, B. Yu, and J. Wei, “A coupled volume of fluid and level set method based on analytic PLIC for unstructured quadrilateral grids,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 189–205, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Gu, H. L. Wen, Y. Yao, and C. H. Yu, “A volume of fluid method algorithm for simulation of surface tension dominant two-phase flows,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Griebel, and M. Klitz, “CLSVOF as a fast and mass-conserving extension of the level-set method for the simulation of two-phase flow problems,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Y. Tsui, C. Y. Liu, and S. W. Lin, “Coupled level-set and volume-of-fluid method for two-phase flow calculations,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 173–185, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Alam, N. K.-R. Kevlahan, O. V. Vasilyev, and Z. Hossain, “A multiresolution model for the simulation of transient heat and mass Transfer,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 147–170, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2012.666167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. J. Liao, “Do peaked solitary water waves indeed exist,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1792–1821, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Q. Xia, Z. J. Qiao, and J. B. Li, “An integrable system with peakon, complex peakon, weak kink, and kink-peakon interactional solutions,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 63, pp. 292–306, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Pan, “A high-order finite volume method for solving one dimensional convection and diffusion equations,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 533–548, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. Xu, “A high-order finite volume scheme for unsteady convection-dominated convection-diffusion equations,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 253–272, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Degasperis, D. D. Holm, and A. N. W. Hone, “A new integrable equation with peakon solutions,” Theor. Math. Phys., vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 1463–1474, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. L. Xie, Q. Lin, and B. Gao, “Periodic and solitary travelling-wave solutions of a CH-DP equation,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3941–3948, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Yoshimasa, “Multisoliton solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation and their peakon limit,” Inverse Probl., vol. 21, pp. 1553–1570, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Degasperis, and M. Procesi, “Asymptotic integrability,” in Symmetry and Perturbation Theory, vol. 23–37, Singapore: World Scientific, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• R. Camassa, and D. D. Holm, “An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1661–1664, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Fuchssteiner, and A. S. Fokas, “Symplectic structures their Bäcklund transformation and hereditary symmetries,” Physica D, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–66, 1981. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(81)90004-X.
   Google Scholar
• R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, and J. M. Hyman, “A new integrable shallow water equation,” Adv. Appl. Mech., vol. 31, pp. 1–33, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• A. Constantin, and D. Lannes, “The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations,” Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 165–186, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00205-008-0128-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lundmark, and J. Szmigielski, “Degasperis-Procesi peakons and the discrete cubic string,” Int. Math Res. Pap, vol. 2005, no. 2, pp. 53–116, 2005. DOI: 10.1155/IMRP.2005.53.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Miyatake, and T. Matsuo, “Conservative finite difference schemes for the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 236, no. 15, pp. 3728–3740, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Holden, and X. Raynaud, “Convergence of a finite difference scheme for the Camassa-Holm equation,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1655–1680, 2006. DOI: 10.1137/040611975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. H. Chiu, L. Lee, and T. W. H. Sheu, “A dispersion-relation-preserving algorithm for a nonlinear shallow-water wave equation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 21, pp. 8034–8052, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. H. Chiu, L. Lee, and T. W. H. Sheu, “A sixth-order dual preserving algorithm for the Camassa-Holm equation,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 233, no. 11, pp. 2767–2778, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. C. W. Shu, “A local discontinuous Galerkin method for the Camassa-Holm equation,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1998–2021, 2008. DOI: 10.1137/070679764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Cohen, B. Owren, and X. Raynaud, “Multi-symplectic integration of the Camassa-Holm equation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 227, no. 11, pp. 5492–5512, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Camassa, J. Huang, and L. Lee, “On a completely integrable numerical scheme for a nonlinear shallow-water wave equation,” J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., vol. 12, no. sup1, pp. 146–162, 2005. DOI: 10.2991/jnmp.2005.12.s1.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Camassa, J. Huang, and L. Lee, “Integral and integrable algorithms for a nonlinear shallow-water wave equation,” J. Comput. Phys, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 547–572, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Matsuo, and H. Yamaguchi, “An energy-conserving Galerkin scheme for a class of nonlinear dispersive equations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 12, pp. 4346–4358, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ohta, K. Maruno, and B. Feng, “An integrable semi-discretization of the Camassa–Holm equation and its determinant solution,” J. Phys. A-Math. Theor., vol. 41, no. 35, pp. 443–452, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. F. Feng, and Y. Liu, “An operator splitting method for the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 228, no. 20, pp. 7805–7820, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. A. Hoel, “A numerical scheme using multi-shock peakons to compute solutions of the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Electron J. Differ. Equations, vol. 2007, no. 100, pp. 249–266, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Xu, and C. W. Shu, “Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for high-order time-dependent partial differential equations,” Commun. Comput. Phys., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1–46, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Xu, and C. W. Shu, “Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Commun. Comput. Phys, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 474–508, 2011. DOI: 10.4208/cicp.2009.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. H. Shieh, and M. C. Chen, “Study of high-order-accurate limiters for time-dependent contact discontinuity and shock capturing,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 56–79, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2015.1052296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dave, C. Anghan, S. Saincher, and J. Banerjee, “A high-resolution Navier-Stokes solver for direct numerical simulation of free shear flow,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 840–860, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2019.1580952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Li, Y. Ju, and C. Zhang, “Hybrid central-WENO scheme for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 170–189, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2017.1358984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. H. Yu, and T. W. H. Sheu, “A dispersively accurate compact finite difference method for the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 493–512, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.046.
   Google Scholar
• B. P. Leonard, “The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection,” Comput. Method Appl. M, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 17–74, 1991. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90232-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Oevel, “Symplectic Runge-Kutta schemes II: Classification of symplectic method,” Preprint, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• C. H. Yu, Z. Gao, and T. W. H. Sheu, “Development of a symplectic and phase error reducing perturbation finite-difference advection scheme,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 136–151, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2015.1097241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Gu, H. L. Wen, S. Ye, R. D. An, and C. H. Yu, “Development of a mass-preserving level set redistancing algorithm for simulation of rising bubble,” Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 699–727, 2018. vol DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2018.1525157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ghosh, and J. D. Baeder, “Compact reconstruction schemes with weighted ENO limiting for hyperbolic conservation laws,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. A1678–A1706, 2012. DOI: 10.1137/110857659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. S. Jiang, and C. W. Shu, “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 202–228, 1996. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lundmark, “Formation and dynamics of shock waves in the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” J. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 169–198, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00332-006-0803-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Liu, and Z. Yin, “Global existence and blow-up phenomena for the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Commun. Math Phys., vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 801–820, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-006-0082-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar