A Critical Review of Soil Sampling and Data Analysis Strategies for Source Tracing of Soil in Forensic Investigations

References

• Stahr, K. Soil Functions, Soil Potential Uses and Ecosystem Services. In Encyclopedia of Soiols in the Environment, 2nd Edition; Goss, M. J.; Oliver, M., Eds.; Academic Press, 2023, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822974-3.00173-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, G.; Ning, X.; Chen, S.; Zhong, L.; Guo, C.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; Tang, M.; Liao, G.; Wang, X.; et al. Differences in Fruit Yields and Essential Oil Contents and Composition among Natural Provenances of Litsea Cubeba in China and Their Relationships with Main Habitat Factors. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 194, 116285. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L.; Liu, G.; Wu, D. Characteristics and Provenance of Hazardous Trace Elements in Soil from a Typical Agricultural Region in Eastern Anhui, China. Geosci. J. 2020, 24, 575–584. DOI: 10.1007/s12303-019-0043-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogewerff, J. A.; Reimann, C.; Ueckermann, H.; Frei, R.; Frei, K. M.; van Aswegen, T.; Stirling, C.; Reid, M.; Clayton, A.; Ladenberger, A, GEMAS Project Team. Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr in European Soils: A Baseline for Provenancing Studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 1033–1044. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Q.-Q.; Chen, Y.-X.; Henderson, J.; Bayon, G. A Large-Scale Sr and Nd Isotope Baseline for Archaeological Provenance in Silk Road Regions and Its Application to Plant-Ash Glass. J. Archaeolog. Sci. 2023, 149, 105695. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2022.105695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadayi, S. Assessment of the Link between Evidence and Crime Scene through Soil Bacterial and Fungal Microbiome: A Mock Case in Forensic Study. Forensic Sci. Int. 2021, 329, 111060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, L. A.; Fitzpatrick, R. W. Forensic Soil Science. In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 3rd ed.; Houck, M. M., Ed.; Elsevier, 2023, pp. 688–699. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823677-2.00235-X.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V.; Chauhan, R.; Kumar, R. Spectral Characteristics of Organic Soil Matter: A Comprehensive Review. Microchem. J. 2021, 171, 106836. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangwan, P.; Nain, T.; Singal, K.; Hooda, N.; Sharma, N. Soil as a Tool of Revelation in Forensic Science: A Review. Anal. Methods. 2020, 12, 5150–5159. DOI: 10.1039/d0ay01634a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, R. H.; Lednev, I. K. Soil from Footwear is a Newly Rediscovered Type of Forensic Evidence Due to the Application of Modern Analytical Techniques: A Review. Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 163, 117081. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, P. N.; Blake, W. H.; Gaspar, L.; Gateuille, D.; Koiter, A. J.; Lobb, D. A.; Petticrew, E. L.; Reiffarth, D. G.; Smith, H. G.; Woodward, J. C. Fingerprinting and Tracing the Sources of Soils and Sediments: Earth and Ocean Science, Geoarchaeological, Forensic, and Human Health Applications. Earth. Sci. Rev. 2016, 162, 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauzier, G.; van Bronswijk, W.; Lewis, S. W. Chemometrics in Forensic Science: Approaches and Applications. Analyst. 2021, 146, 2415–2448. DOI: 10.1039/d1an00082a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barra, I.; Haefele, S. M.; Sakrabani, R.; Kebede, F. Soil Spectroscopy with the Use of Chemometrics, Machine Learning and Pre-Processing Techniques in Soil Diagnosis: Recent advances-A Review. Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 135, 116166. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frøslev, T. G.; Ejrnæs, R.; Hansen, A. J.; Bruun, H. H.; Nielsen, I. B.; Ekelund, F.; Vestergård, M.; Kjøller, R. Treated like Dirt: Robust Forensic and Ecological Inferences from Soil eDNA after Challenging Sample Storage. Environ. DNA. 2023, 5, 158–174. DOI: 10.1002/edn3.367.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, R.; Rossiter, D. G.; Zhao, Y. G.; Li, D. C.; Liu, F.; Zheng, G. H.; Zhang, G. L. The Choice of Spectral Similarity Algorithms Influences Suspected Soil Sample Provenance. Forensic Sci. Int. 2023, 347, 111688. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, M. P. N. E.; Guedes, C. C. F. D. F.; Melo, V. D. O.; Mascarenhas, R.; Salvador, F. A. S. Evaluating Geostatistical Methods along with Semi-Destructive Analysis for Forensic Provenancing Organic-Rich Soils in Humid Subtropical Climate. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022, 341, 111508. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newland, T. G.; Pitts, K.; Lewis, S. W. Multimodal Spectroscopy with Chemometrics for the Forensic Analysis of Western Australia Sandy Soils. Forensic Chem. 2022, 28, 100412. DOI: 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testoni, S.; Dawson, L.; Melo, V.; Lopes-Mazzetto, J.; Ramalho, B.; Salvador, F. Soil Colour and Plant-Wax Markers: Application in Forensic Investigations under Urban Subtropical Environments. Forensic Sci. 2022, 2, 57–71. DOI: 10.3390/forensicsci2010005.
   Google Scholar
• Maione, C.; Luíza da Costa, N.; Barbosa, F.; Barbosa, R. M. A Cluster Analysis Methodology for the Categorization of Soil Samples for Forensic Sciences Based on Elemental Fingerprint. Appl. Artif. Intel. 2022, 36, e2010941. DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2021.2010941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J. G. P.; Oxley, A. P. A.; Wos-Oxley, M. L.; Hayes, R.; Pickles, T.; Roberts, K.; Conlan, X. A. The Cyclic Nature of Soil Chemistry: Forensic Analysis with the Aid of Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Talanta Open. 2022, 6, 100126. DOI: 10.1016/j.talo.2022.100126.
   Google Scholar
• Caritat, P. D.; Woods, B.; Simpson, T.; Nichols, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Ilheo, A.; Aberle, M. G.; Hoogewerff, J. Forensic Soil Provenancing in Urban/Suburban Setting: A Simultaneous Multivariate Approach. J. Forensic Sci. 2022, 67, 927–935. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Hu, C.; Zheng, J.; Mei, H.; Zhu, J.; Fan, S.; Zhong, Q. Mineralogical and Elemental Data for Soil Discriminating and Geolocation Tracing. Sci. Justice. 2022, 62, 76–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinero-Garcia, A.; Muller, A.; Martin-Garcia, J. M.; Simonsen, S. L.; Delgado, R. Provenance of Quartz Grains from Soils over Quaternary Terraces along the Guadalquivir River. Spain. Geoderma. 2022, 414, 115769. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. C.; Marolf, A.; Estoppey, N.; Massonnet, G. A Probabilistic Approach towards Source Level Inquiries for Forensic Soil Examination Based on Mineral Counts. Forensic Sci. Int. 2021, 328, 111035. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocak, A.; Wyatt, W.; Comanescu, M. A. Comparative Study of ATR and DRIFT Infrared Spectroscopy Techniques in the Analysis of Soil Samples. Forensic Sci. Int. 2021, 328, 111002. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y.; Minasny, B.; McBratney, A. Identifying Soil Provenance Based on Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Measurements Using Similarity and Inverse-Mapping Approaches – a Case in the Lower Hunter Valley, Australia. Geoderma Reg. 2021, 25, e00368. DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H.; Yao, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Hu, C.; Yuan, M.; Mei, H.; Zhu, J. A Case Study in Forensic Soil Comparison. J. Forensic Sci. 2022, 67, 766–774. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caritat, P. D.; Woods, B.; Simpson, T.; Nichols, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Ilheo, A.; Aberle, M. G.; Hoogewerff, J. Forensic Soil Provenancing in Urban/Suburban Setting: A Sequential Multivariate Approach. J. Forensic Sci. 2021, 66, 1679–1696. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idrizi, H.; Najdoski, M.; Kuzmanovski, I. Classification of Urban Soils for Forensic Purposes Using Supervised Self-Organizing Maps. J. Chemom. 2021, 35, e3328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, L. A.; Webb, J. B.; Ingham, J.; Monteith, S.; Saginor, I. Soil Survey Laboratory Grain Count Data to Substantiate the Rarity of Mineral Grains in Forensic Soil Reports of Examination. J. Forensic Sci. 2021, 66, 2413–2423. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, R.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, K.; Sharma, V. On the Discrimination of Soil Samples by Derivative Diffuse Reflectance UV-vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Chemometrics Methods. Forensic Sci. Int. 2021, 319, 110655. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, K. M.; Clarke, R. M. The Forensic Discrimination of Quartz Sands from the Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia. Forensic Sci. Int.: Rep. 2020, 2, 100130. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100130.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C.; Mei, H.; Guo, H.; Wang, P.; Zhu, J. The Analysis of Soil Evidence to Associate Criminal Tool and Location. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 309, 110231. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Profumo, A.; Gorroni, A.; Guarnieri, S. A.; Mellerio, G. G.; Cucca, L.; Merli, D. GC-MS Qualitative Analysis of the Volatile, Semivolatile and Volatilizable Fractions of Soil Evidence for Forensic Application: A Chemical Fingerprinting. Talanta. 2020, 219, 121304. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X.; Du, C.; Ma, F.; Shen, Y.; Zhou, J. Forensic Soil Analysis Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and Fourier Transform Infrared Total Attenuated Reflectance Spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR): Principles and Case Studies. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 310, 110222. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, R.; Kumar, R.; Diwan, P. K.; Sharma, V. Thermogravimetric Analysis and Chemometric Based Methods for Soil Examination: Application to Soil Forensics. Forensic Chem. 2020, 17, 100191. DOI: 10.1016/j.forc.2019.100191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, R.; Rossiter, D. G.; Zhao, Y. G.; Li, D. C.; Zhang, G. L. Forensic Soil Identification: Comparing Matching by Color, vis-NFIR Spectroscopy and Easily-Measured Physio-Chemical Properties. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 317, 110544. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seybold, C. A.; Ferguson, R.; Wysocki, D.; Bailey, S.; Anderson, J.; Nester, B.; Schoeneberger, P.; Wills, S.; Libohova, Z.; Hoover, D.; Thomas, P. Application of Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy in Soil Survey. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2019, 83, 1746–1759. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2019.06.0205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzetto, J. M. L.; Melo, V. F.; Bonfleur, E. J.; Vidal-Torrado, P.; Dieckow, J. Potential of Soil Organic Matter Molecular Chemistry Determined by Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for Forensic Investigations. Sci. Justice. 2019, 59, 635–642. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. M.; Scott, K. R.; Ainley, J.; Bull, P. A. Journey History Reconstruction from the Soils and Sediments on Footwear: An Empirical Approach. Sci. Justice. 2019, 59, 306–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløjgaard, C.; Frøslev, T. G.; Brunbjerg, A. K.; Bruun, H. H.; Moeslund, J.; Hansen, A. J.; Ejrnæs, R. Predicting Provenance of Forensic Soil Samples: Linking Soil to Ecological Habitats by Metabarcoding and Supervised Classification. PLoS One. 2019, 14, e0202844. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, M.; Weindorf, D. C.; Silva, S. H. G.; Chakraborty, S.; dos Santos Teixeira, A. F.; Guilherme, L. R. G.; Curi, N. Parent Material Distribution Mapping from Tropical Soils Data via Machine Learning and Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (pXRF) Spectrometry in Brazil. Geoderma. 2019, 354, 113885. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foran, D. R.; Badgley, A. J. Bacterial Profiling of Soil for Forensic Investigations: Consideration of Ex Situ Changes in Questioned and Known Soil Samples. J. Forensic Sci. 2020, 65, 471–480. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikkawa, H. S.; Naganuma, K.; Kumisaka, K.; Sugita, R. Semi-Automated Scanning Electron Microscopy Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry Forensic Analysis of Soil Samples. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 305, 109947. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habtom, H.; Pasternak, Z.; Matan, O.; Azulay, C.; Gafny, R.; Jurkevitch, E. Applying Microbial Biogeography in Soil Forensics. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019, 38, 195–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G.; Dawson, L. A.; Ross, J. M.; Morgan, R. M. The Discrimination of Geoforensic Trace Material from Close Proximity Locations by Organic Profiling Using HPLC and Plant Wax Marker Analysis by GC. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 288, 310–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tighe, M.; Forster, N.; Guppy, C.; Savage, D.; Grave, P.; Young, I. M. Georeferenced Soil Provenancing with Digital Signatures. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3162. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21530-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, R.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, V. Soil Forensics: A Spectroscopic Examination of Trace Evidence. Microchem. J. 2018, 139, 74–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damaso, N.; Mendel, J.; Mendoza, M.; von Wettberg, E. J.; Narasimhan, G.; Mills, D. Bioinformatics Approach to Assess the Biogeographical Patterns of Soil Communities: The Utility for Soil Provenance. J. Forensic Sci. 2018, 63, 1033–1042. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, V. F.; Mazzetto, J. M. L.; Dieckow, J.; Bonfleur, E. J. Factor Analysis of Organic Soils for Site Discrimination in a Forensic Setting. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 290, 244–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, R. S.; Melo, V. F.; Abreu, G. G. F.; Sousa, M. H.; Chaker, J. A.; Gomes, J. A. Soil Forensics: How Far Can Soil Clay Analysis Distinguish between Soil Vestiges? Sci. Justice. 2018, 58, 138–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, K.; Morgan, R. M.; Holmes, J. The Potential for Geochemical Discrimination of Single- and Mixed-Source Soil Samples from Close Proximity Urban Parkland Locations. Australian J. Forensic Sci. 2017, 49, 161–174. DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2016.1144789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G.; Dawson, L. A.; Brewer, M. J.; Morgan, R. M. The Identification of Markers for Geoforensic HPLC Profiling at Close Proximity Sites. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 272, 127–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitdehaag, S.; Wiarda, W.; Donders, T.; Kuiper, I. Forensic Comparison of Soil Samples Using Nondestructive Elemental Analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 2017, 62, 861–868. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krongchai, C.; Jakmunee, J.; Funsueb, S.; Kittiwachana, S. Application of Multiple Self-Organizing Maps for Classification of Soil Samples in Thailand according to Their Geographic Origins. J. Chemometrics. 2017, 31, e2871. DOI: 10.1002/cem.2871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanèche, S.; Schauser, L.; Dawson, L.; Franqueville, L.; Simonet, P. Microbial Soil Community Analyses for Forensic Science: Application to a Blind Test. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 270, 153–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, K. Geological and Soil Evidence Forensic Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton (FL), 2007
   Google Scholar
• Althubaiti, A. Sample Size Determination: A Practical Guide for Health Researchers. J. Gen. Fam. Med. 2023, 24, 72–78. DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. K.; Thomson, S.; Ramsay, C. R.; MacLennan, G. S.; Grimshaw, J. M. Sample Size Calculator for Cluster Randomized Trials. Comput. Biol. Med. 2004, 34, 113–125. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00039-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, E.; Ball, J. Statistics Review 4: Sample Size Calculations. Crit. Care. 2002, 6, 335–341. DOI: 10.1186/cc1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartemink, A. E.; Zhang, Y.; Bockheim, J. G.; Curi, N.; Silva, S. H. G.; Grauer-Gray, J.; Lowe, D. J.; Krasilnikov, P. Chapter Three – Soil Horizon Variation: A Review. Adv. Agronomy. 2020, 160, 125–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, C. V.; Drew, R. W.; Slabaugh, J. D. Soil Survey of Dade County Area, Florida; USDA NRCS: Gainesville (FL); 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Che Soh, M.; B. Crime and Urbanization: Revisited Malaysian Case. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 42, 291–299. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.193.
   Google Scholar
• British Geological Survey (BGS). Landoforms. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discovering-geology/geological-processes/landforms/#:∼:text=Landforms%20are%20features%20on%20the%20Earth%E2%80%99s%20surface%20that,features%2C%20such%20as%20ocean%20basins%20and%20mid-ocean%20ridges. (accessed Aug 20, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Report on the Environment: Land Use. https://www.epa.gov/report-environment/land-use. (accessed Aug 20, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Stetler, L. D. Geomorphology. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences; Elsevier, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09078-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, L. V. Residual Soil Mineralogy and Dune Division, Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 1996, 43, 31–44. DOI: 10.1080/08120099608728233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministero Delle Politiche Agricole, D. M. Approvazione Dei “Metodi Ufficiali di Analisi Chimica Del Suolo. Gazzetta Ufficiale Suppl, Order. 1999, 248. http://ctntes.arpa.piemonte.it/Bonifiche/Documenti/Norme/13_Set_99.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sappi Fine Paper North America. Defining and Communicating color: The CIELAB system, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Geisen, S.; Mitchell, E. A. D.; Adl, S.; Bonkowski, M.; Dunthorn, M.; Ekelund, F.; Fernandez, L. D.; Jousset, A.; Krashevska, V.; Singer, D.; et al. Soil Protists: A Fertile Frontier in Soil Biology Research. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 293–323. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuy006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiner, K.; Bik, H. M.; Machler, E.; Seymour, M.; Lacoursiere-Roussel, A.; Altermatt, F.; Creer, S.; Bista, I.; Lodge, D. M.; daVere, N.; et al. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: Transforming How we Survey Animal and Plant Communities. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 5872–5895. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. M.; Linacre, A. Massively Parallel Sequencing is Unlocking the Potential of Environmental Trace Evidence. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021, 50, 102393. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edouard, J.; Zohar, P. A Walk on the Dirt: Soil Microbial Forensics from Ecological Theory to the Crime Lab. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 45, 053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julia, S. A.; Noah, F.; Robert, R. D. The Future of Environmental DNA in Forensic Science. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01504-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, L. D.; Serve, L.; Gadel, F.; Blazi, J.-L. Lignin-Derived Phenolic Compounds in the Particulate Organic Matter of a French Mediterranean River: Seasonal and Spatial Variations. Org. Geochem. 2001, 32, 305–320. DOI: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00173-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genetta, M. Y.; Ira, S. L. Recent Forensic Applications of Enhanced Chromatographic Separation Methods. J. Separat. Sci. 2022, 45, 369–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dove, H.; Mayes, R. W. Protocol for the Analysis of n-Alkanes and Other Plant-Wax Compounds and for Their Use as Markers for Quantifying the Nutrient Supply of Large Mammalian Herbivores. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 1680–1697. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogts, A.; Moossen, H.; Rommerskirchen, F.; Rullkötter, J. Distribution Patterns and Stable Carbon Isotopic Composition of Alkanes and Alkan-1-Ols from Plant Waxes of African Rain Forest and Savanna C3 Species. Org. Geochem. 2009, 40, 1037–1054. DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elisa, B. Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (PXRF) Spectrometry of Earth Materials: Considerations for Forensic Analysis. Geol. Soc., Lond., Spec. Publ. 2019, 492, 225–238. DOI: 10.1144/SP492-2017-346.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. C.; Jemain, A. A. On Overview of PCA Application Strategy in Processing High Dimensionality Forensic Data. Microchem. J. 2021, 169, 106608. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. C.; Liong, C. Y.; Jemain, A. A. Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) for Classification of High-Dimensional (HD): A Review of Contemporary Practice Strategies and Knowledge Gaps. Analyst. 2018, 143, 3526–3539. DOI: 10.1039/c8an00599k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, I. H. Machine Learning: algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2021, 2, 160. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nowroozi, E.; Dehghantanha, A.; Parizi, R. M.; Choo, K.-K. R. A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Adversarial Image Forensics. Comput. Security. 2021, 100, 102092. DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.102092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Rishi, Bhute, Ashish Ramesh, Bastia, Binaya Kumar, Diksha,. Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technology for the Prediction of Postmortem Interval: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022, 340, 111473. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdeira, J. O.; Silva, P. D.; Cadima, J.; Minhoto, M. R package ‘subselect’: Selecting Variable Subsets, 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/subselect/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rossel, R. A. V.; Cattle, S. R.; Ortega, A.; Fouad, Y. In Situ Measurements of Soil Colour, Mineral Composition and Clay Content by vis-NIR Spectroscopy. Geoderma. 2009, 150, 253–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, F. A.; Lefkoff, A. B.; Boardman, J. W.; Heidebrecht, K. B.; Shapiro, A. T.; Barloon, P. J.; Goetz, A. F. H. The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS)—Interactive Visualization and Analysis of Imaging Spectrometer Data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993, 44, 145–163. DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(93)90013-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalanobis, P. C. Reprint of: Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936) "on the Generalised Distance in Statistics. Sankhya: Indian J. Stats. 2018, 80-A, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chein-I, C. An Information-Theoretic Approach to Spectral Variability, Similarity, and Discrimination for Hyperspectral Image Analysis. IEEE Transact. Info. Theory. 2000, 46, 1927–1932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Annals Statist. 1991, 19, 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caritat, P. D.; Mann, A. An Improved Method for Assessing the Degree of Geochemical Similarity (DOGS2) between Samples from Multi-Element Geochemical Datasets. GEEA. 2019, 19, 58–73. DOI: 10.1144/geochem2018-021.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, M. J.; Kotlyar, B. B.; Ludington, S.; Folger, H.; Mossotti, V. G. Multielement Geochemical Dataset of Surficial Materials for the Northern Great Basin. US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 2002, 2, 227.
   Google Scholar
• Charrad, M.; Ghazzali, N.; Boiteau, V.; Niknafs, A. NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set. J. Stat. Soft. 2014, 61, 1–36. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v061.i06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. A. Correlation-Based Feature Selection for Discrete and Numeric Class Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML); P. Langley, Ed.; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: Waikato, (NZ), 2000; pp 359–366
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, G. S. Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Forensic Likelihood-Ratio Systems. Sci. Justice. 2011, 51, 91–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, F. A. O.; Bellinaso, H.; Mello, D. C.; Safanelli, J. L.; Mendes, D. S.; Amorim, W.; Gomez, M. T. A.; Poppiel, A. M. R.; Silvero, R. R.; Gholizadeh, N. E. Q.; et al. Soil Parent Material Prediction through Satellite Multispectral Analysis on a Regional Scale at the Western Paulista Plateau, Brazil. Geoderma Reg. 2021, 26, e00412. DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J.; Liu, W.; Simayijiang, H.; Hu, P.; Yan, J. Application of Microbiome in Forensics. Genomics. Proteomics Bioinform. 2023, 21, 97–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2022.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, N. R.; Martin, B.; Hoogewerff, J.; Aberle, M. G.; Caritat, P.; De; Roffey, P.; Edwards, R.; Malik, A.; Thwaites, P.; Waycott, M.; Young, J. The Utility of Dust for Forensic Intelligence: Exploring Collection Methods and Detection Limits for Environmental DNA, Elemental and Mineralogical Analyses of Dust Samples. Forensic Sci. Int. 2023, 344, 111599. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendik, J.; Kalia, R.; Sukumaran, J.; Richardot, W. H.; Hoh, E.; Kelley, S. Automated High Confidence Compound Identification of Electron Ionization Mass Spectra for Nontargeted Analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2021, 1660, 462656. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.; Saini, A.; Hao, C.; Harner, T. Passive Air Sampling and Nontargeted Analysis for Screening POP-like Chemicals in the Atmosphere: Opportunities and Challenges. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 132, 116052. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, W.; Zheng, F.; Chen, T.; Zhang, X.; Xia, Y.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Zhao, C.; Xu, G. Nontargeted Screening Method for Veterinary Drugs and Their Metabolites Based on Fragmentation Characteristics from Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Food Chem. 2022, 369, 130928. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazi, M. G. M.; Lee, L. C.; Sino, H.; Halim, M. I. A. Review of Contemporary Chemometric Strategies Applied on Preparing GC-MS Data in Forensic Analysis. Microchem. J. 2022, 181, 107732. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzanowski, W. J. Principles of Multivariate Analysis; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Khare, S. K.; March, S.; Barua, P. D.; Gadre, V. M.; Acharya, U. R. Application of Data Fusion for Automated Detection of Children with Developmental and Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Last Decade. Inform. Fusion. 2023, 99, 101898. DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asachi, M.; Camargo-Valero, M. A. Multi-Sensors Data Fusion for Monitoring of Powdered and Granule Products: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Adv. Powder Technol. 2023, 34, 104055. DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2023.104055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J.; Hong, D.; Gao, L.; Yao, J.; Zheng, K.; Zhang, B.; Chanussot, J. Deep Learning in Multimodal Remote Sensing Data Fusion: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obser. Geoinform. 2022, 112, 102926. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmes, G. A.; Roedl, G.; Conley, J.; Forensic, G. I. S. The Role of Geospatial Technologies for Investigating Crime and Providing Evidence; Springer Netherlands, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fantappiè, M.; L'Abate, G.; Schillaci, C.; Costantini, E. A. Digital Soil Mapping of Italy to Map Derived Soil Profiles with Neural Networks. Geoderma Reg. 2023, 32, e00619. DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, T.; He, L.; Wang, R.; Li, Z.; Hu, Z.; Wu, G. Digital Mapping of Heavy Metals in Urban Soils: A Review and Research Challenges. CATENA. 2023, 228, 107183. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken, C. G. G.; Taroni, F. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
   Google Scholar