Mashing performance as a function of malt particle size in beer production

References

• Ab’lah, N., and T. W. Wong. 2020. Chapter 9: Starch as oral colon-specific nano- and microparticulate drug carriers. In Polymer science and innovative applications, eds. M. A. A. AlMaadeed, D. Ponnamma, and M. A. Carignano, 287–330. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rabadi, G. J. S., R. G. Gilbert, and M. J. Gidley. 2009. Effect of particle size on kinetics of starch digestion in milled barley and sorghum grains by porcine alpha-amylase. Journal of Cereal Science 50 (2):198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amri, B., K. Khamassi, M. B. Ali, J. A. Teixeira da Silva, and L. Bettaieb Ben Kaab. 2016. Effects of gibberellic acid on the process of organic reserve mobilization in barley grains germinated in the presence of cadmium and molybdenum. South African Journal of Botany 106:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, E. K., and E. Zannini. 2013. 4. Barley. In Cereal grains for the food and beverage industries, eds. E. K. Arendt and E. Zannini, 155–201. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baik, B.-K. 2014. Chapter 10. Processing of barley grain for food and feed. In Barley, eds. P. R. Shewry and S. E. Ullrich. 2nd ed., 233–68. Washington, DC: AACC International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bamforth, C. W. 2017. Progress in brewing science and beer production. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 8 (1):161–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BeMiller, J. N. 2019. 6. Starches: Molecular and granular structures and properties. In Carbohydrate chemistry for food scientists, ed. J. N. BeMiller. 3rd ed., 159–89. Washington, DC: AACC International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, Z. 2009. Chapter 6. Size reduction. In Food process engineering and technology, ed. Z. Berk, 153–74. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, N. S., L. G. Wilkinson, S. F. Khor, N. J. Shirley, F. Lok, B. Skadhauge, R. A. Burton, G. B. Fincher, and H. M. Collins. 2017. Morphology, carbohydrate distribution, gene expression, and enzymatic activities related to cell wall hydrolysis in four barley varieties during simulated malting. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1872. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewley, J. D. 1997. Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant cell 9 (7):1055–66. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.7.1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt, D. F., T. Boylston, S. Hendrich, J.-L. Jane, J. Hollis, L. Li, J. McClelland, S. Moore, G. J. Phillips, M. Rowling, et al. 2013. Resistant starch: Promise for improving human health. Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 4 (6):587–601. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasel, H. M., P. C. Hoffman, and R. D. Shaver. 2006. Degree of starch access: An enzymatic method to determine starch degradation potential of corn grain and corn silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 128 (1–2):96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandam, C., X. M. Meyer, J. Proth, P. Strehaiano, and H. Pingaud. 2003. An original kinetic model for the enzymatic hydrolysis of starch during mashing. Biochemical Engineering Journal 13 (1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/S1369-703X.(02)00100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornejo-Ramírez, Y. I., O. Martínez-Cruz, C. L. Del Toro-Sánchez, F. J. Wong-Corral, J. Borboa-Flores, and F. J. Cinco-Moroyoqui. 2018. The structural characteristics of starches and their functional properties. CyTA - Journal of Food 16 (1):1003–17. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2018.1518343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, D., and S. Degner. 2016. An overview on the role of lipids and fatty acids in barley grain and their products during beer brewing. Food Research International 81:114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schepper, C. F., P. Michiels, N. A. Langenaeken, and C. M. Courtin. 2020. Accurate quantification of small and large starch granules in barley and malt. Carbohydrate Polymers 227:115329. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deme, G. D., B. Tessema, and M. T. Gari. 2020. Evaluation of malting potential of different barley varieties. Journal of Water Pollution & Purification Research 6 (3):24–35. doi: 10.37591/JOWPPR.V6I3.787.
   Google Scholar
• Devolli, A., F. Dara, M. Stafasani, E. Shahinasi, and M. Kodra. 2018. The influence of protein content on beer quality and colloidal stability. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2 (4):391–407. doi: 10.29329/ijiaar.2018.174.12.
   Google Scholar
• Dhital, S., A. K. Shrestha, and M. J. Gidley. 2010. Relationship between granule size and in vitro digestibility of maize and potato starches. Carbohydrate Polymers 82 (2):480–8. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhital, S., F. J. Warren, P. J. Butterworth, P. R. Ellis, and M. J. Gidley. 2017. Mechanisms of starch digestion by α-amylase-structural basis for kinetic properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57 (5):875–92. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2014.922043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didora, P. L. 2018. The evolution of of brewing tech: Innovations that have redefined beer in the modern age. The Growler Magazine. https://www.growlermag.com/the-evolution-of-of-brewing-tech-innovations-that-have-redefined-beer-in-the-modern-age/.
   Google Scholar
• Fastnaught, C. E. 2001. Barley fiber. In Handbook of dietary fiber, ed. M. L. D. Susan Sungsoo Cho, 894. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Ferré, H., A. Broberg, J. O. Duus, and K. K. Thomsen. 2000. A novel type of arabinoxylan arabinofuranohydrolase isolated from germinated barley analysis of substrate preference and specificity by nano-probe nmr. European Journal of Biochemistry 267 (22):6633–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01758.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finnie, C., and B. Svensson. 2014. Chapter 6. Barley grain proteins. In Barley, eds. P. R. Shewry and S. E. Ullrich. 2nd ed., 123–68. Washington, DC: AACC International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, S., E. Miniati, and P. Fantozzi. 2001. Carbohydrate determination in wort and beer by hplc-elsd. Monatschrift fuer Brauwissenschaft 54:209–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fowkes, N., and R. O’Brien. 2010. The application of enzyme reaction, nonlinear diffusion models to the malting process. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466 (2113):157–75. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, G. 2018. Chapter 16. Starch in brewing applications. In Starch in food, eds. M. Sjöö and L. Nilsson. 2nd ed., 633–59. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, G. P., A. M. Kelly, D. Poulsen, A. Inkerman, and R. Henry. 2006. Selecting for increased barley grain size. Journal of Cereal Science 43 (2):198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C., I. Kang, J. Lee, D. Song, M. Sjöö, J. Choi, S. Lee, and L. Nilsson. 2019. Fractionation and characterization of starch granules using field-flow fractionation (FFF) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 411 (16):3665–74. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-01852-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomaa, A. M. 2018. Application of enzymes in brewing. Journal of Nutrition and Food Science Forecast 1 (1):5. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3336203.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R., A. Power, J. Chapman, S. Chandra, and D. Cozzolino. 2018. A review on the source of lipids and their interactions during beer fermentation that affect beer quality. Fermentation 4 (4):89. doi: 10.3390/fermentation4040089.
   Google Scholar
• Gram, N. H. 1982. The ultrastructure of germinating barley seeds. II. Breakdown of starch granules and cell walls of the endosperm in three barley varieties. Carlsberg Research Communications 47 (3):173–85. doi: 10.1007/BF02904380.
   Google Scholar
• GRDC. 2017, June. Barley—GRDC grownotes. https://grdc.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/246678/GRDC-GrowNotes-Barley-Western.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, M., N. Abu-Ghannam, and E. Gallaghar. 2010. Barley for brewing: Characteristic changes during malting, brewing and applications of its by-products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 9 (3):318–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00112.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., and S. K. Chakrabarty. 2013. Gibberellic acid in plant. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8 (9):e25504. doi: 10.4161/psb.25504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison, M. A. 2009. Beer/brewing. In Encyclopedia of microbiology, ed. M. Schaechter. 3rd ed., 23–33. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R. J. 2016. Barley: Harvesting, storage, and transport. In Encyclopedia of food grains, eds. C. Wrigley, H. Corke, K. Seetharaman, and J. Faubion. 2nd ed., 50–3. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, R. J., and I. A. Cowe. 1990. Factors influencing the hardness (milling energy) and malting quality of barley. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 96 (3):135–6. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1990.tb01024.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høj, P. B., D. J. Hartman, N. A. Morrice, D. N. P. Doan, and G. B. Fincher. 1989. Purification of (1->3)-beta-glucan endohydrolase isoenzyme II from germinated barley and determination of its primary structure from a cDNA clone. Plant Molecular Biology 13 (1):31–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00027333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, C. J. 2020. Chapter 3. Brewhouse operations. In The craft brewing handbook, ed. C. Smart, 65–109. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holopainen, U. R. M., A. Wilhelmson, M. Salmenkallio-Marttila, P. Peltonen-Sainio, A. Rajala, P. Reinikainen, E. Kotaviita, H. Simolin, and S. Home. 2005. Endosperm structure affects the malting quality of barley (hordeum vulgare l.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53 (18):7279–87. doi: 10.1021/jf050349b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humia, B. V., K. S. Santos, A. M. Barbosa, M. Sawata, M. d C. Mendonça, and F. F. Padilha. 2019. Beer molecules and its sensory and biological properties: A review. Molecules 24 (8):1568. doi: 10.3390/molecules24081568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izydorczyk, M., and J. E. Dexter. 2008. Barley β-glucans and arabinoxylans: Molecular structure, physicochemical properties, and uses in food products—A review. Food Research International 41 (9):850–68. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2008.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izydorczyk, M. S., and M. Edney. 2017. Chapter 9. Barley: Grain-quality characteristics and management of quality requirements. In Cereal grains, eds. C. Wrigley, I. Batey, and D. Miskelly. 2nd ed., 195–234. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jamar, C., P. Du Jardin, and M.-L. Fauconnier. 2011. Cell wall polysaccharides hydrolysis of malting barley (hordeum vulgare l.): A review. Biotechnology, Agronomy and Society and Environment 15:301–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeantet, R., T. Croguennec, P. Schuck, and G. Brule. 2016. Handbook of food science and technology 3: Food biochemistry and technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y. L., R. Speers, A. T. Paulson, and R. J. Stewart. 2004. Barley β-glucans and their degradation during malting and brewing. Technical Quarterly - Master Brewers Association of the Americas 41 (3):231–40.
   Google Scholar
• Källman, A., V. Vamadevan, E. Bertoft, K. Koch, K. Seetharaman, P. Åman, and R. Andersson. 2015. Thermal properties of barley starch and its relation to starch characteristics. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 81:692–700. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koljonen, T., J. J. Hämäläinen, K. Sjöholm, and K. Pietilä. 1995. A model for the prediction of fermentable sugar concentrations during mashing. Journal of Food Engineering 26 (3):329–50. doi: 10.1016/0260-8774(94)00061-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisz, S. 2009. Malting. In Handbook of brewing, 147–64. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Krøll, E. B., M. B. Frøst, and K. Beukel. 2017. Brewer’s spent grains as a new food resource [MSc in Food Innovation and Health]. University of Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325313119_Brewer’s_Spent_Grains_as_A_New_Food_Resource.
   Google Scholar
• Krottenthaler, M., W. Back, and M. Zarnkow. 2009. Wort production. In Handbook of brewing, 165–205. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kruszelnicka, W., A. Marczuk, R. Kasner, P. Bałdowska-Witos, K. Piotrowska, J. Flizikowski, and A. Tomporowski. 2020. Mechanical and processing properties of rice grains. Sustainability 12 (2): 552. doi: 10.3390/su12020552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, W., H. J. Manger, and O. Hendel. 2019. Technology brewing & malting. 6th ed. (ed. O. Hendel). Berlin, Germany: VLB
   Google Scholar
• Langenaeken, N. A., C. F. De Schepper, D. P. De Schutter, and C. M. Courtin. 2019. Different gelatinization characteristics of small and large barley starch granules impact their enzymatic hydrolysis and sugar production during mashing. Food Chemistry 295:138–46. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaridou, A., T. Chornick, and M. S. Izydorczyk. 2008. Variations in morphology and composition of barley endosperm cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88 (13):2388–99. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelievre, J. 1974. Starch damage. Starch - Stärke 26 (3):85–8. doi: 10.1002/star.19740260305.
   Google Scholar
• Li, E., S. Dhital, and J. Hasjim. 2014. Effects of grain milling on starch structures and flour/starch properties. Starch - Stärke 66 (1–2):15–27. doi: 10.1002/star.201200224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, R. 2014. Review of brewing, 2nd ed., by m. J. Lewis and t. W. Young. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 15 (3):225. doi: 10.1080/10496505.2014.919831.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, M. E. 2004. Amylase. In Encyclopedia of gastroenterology, ed. L. R. Johnson, 57–8. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, A. W., S. L. Bazin, L. J. Macri, and J. C. Babb. 1999. Modelling the contribution ofalpha-amylase,beta-amylase and limit dextrinase to starch degradation during mashing. Journal of Cereal Science 29 (2):161–9. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1998.0233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, A. W., and J. E. Morgan. 1986. Hydrolysis of barley starch granules by alpha amylases from barley malt. Cereal Foods World 31 (9):688–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, A. 2020. Understanding malting barley quality. https://fieldcrops.cals.cornell.edu/sites/fieldcrops.cals.cornell.edu/files/shared/documents/Understanding%20Malting%20Barley%20Quality.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, A. M. 1967. The physiology of malting—A review. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 73 (2):146–62. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1967.tb03027.x.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, P. N., P. Prystupa, and F. H. Gutiérrez-Boem. 2014. Protein content of grains of different size fractions in malting barley. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 120 (4):347–52. doi: 10.1002/jib.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, J. 2014. Malt: A practical guide from field to brewhouse. Boulder, CO: Brewers Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marc, A., J. M. Engasser, M. Moll, and R. Flayeux. 1983. A kinetic model of starch hydrolysis by alpha- and beta-amylase during mashing. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 25 (2):481–96. doi: 10.1002/bit.260250214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marković, R. S., O. S. Grujić, and J. D. Pejin. 2003. Conventional and alternative principles for stabilization of protein and polyphenol fractions in beer. Acta Periodica Technologica 2003 (34):3–12. doi: 10.2298/APT0334003M.
   Google Scholar
• Montanari, L., S. Floridi, O. Marconi, M. Tironzelli, and P. Fantozzi. 2005. Effect of mashing procedures on brewing. European Food Research and Technology 221 (1–2):175–9. doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-1166-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanuci, F., L. Jorge, and R. Jorge. 2013. Kinetic, thermodynamic properties, and optimization of barley hydration. Food Science and Technology (Campinas) 33 (4):690–8. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612013000400014.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, W. R., R. F. Tester, and M. J. Gidley. 1994. Properties of damaged starch granules. Ii. Crystallinity, molecular order and gelatinisation of ball-milled starches. Journal of Cereal Science 19 (3):209–17. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1994.1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura, F., and T. Mathias. 2018. A comparative study of dry and wet milling of barley malt and its influence on granulometry and wort composition. Beverages 4:51. doi: 10.3390/beverages4030051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munira, Padil, Sarto, and M. Hidayat. 2018. Inhibitor effect (lipid and protein) in starch hydrolysis to produce glucose by using amyloglucosidase. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 175:012022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012022.
   Google Scholar
• Myllrinen, P., K. Autio, A. H. Schulman, and K. Poutanen. 1998. Heat-induced structural changes of small and large barley starch granules. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 104 (6):343–9. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1998.tb01007.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguleswaran, S., J. Li, T. Vasanthan, D. Bressler, and R. Hoover. 2012. Amylolysis of large and small granules of native triticale, wheat and corn starches using a mixture of α-amylase and glucoamylase. Carbohydrate Polymers 88 (3):864–74. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda, T., S. Tsuda, M. Mori, S. Takigawa, C. Matsuura-Endo, K. Saito, W. H. Arachichige Mangalika, A. Hanaoka, Y. Suzuki, and H. Yamauchi. 2004. The effect of harvest dates on the starch properties of various potato cultivars. Food Chemistry 86 (1):119–25. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R., and N. Fowkes. 2005. Modification patterns in germinating barley-malting II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 233 (3):315–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, R., B. Meyer, and R. Biurrun. 2016. Chapter 6. Wort and wort quality parameters. In Brewing materials and processes, ed. C. W. Bamforth, 113–21. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. J. 2006a. Brewing with malt extract. In How to brew: Ingredients, methods, recipes, and equipment for brewing beer at home. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Brewers Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. J. 2006b. Getting the wort out (lautering). In How to brew: Ingredients, methods, recipes, and equipment for brewing beer at home. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Brewers Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Paynter, B. 1999. Malt quality parameters for malting barley (Farmnote 38). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274077393_Malt_quality_parameters_for_malting_barley.
   Google Scholar
• Phiarais, B. P. N., and E. K. Arendt. 2008. 15. Malting and brewing with gluten-free cereals. In Gluten-free cereal products and beverages, eds. E. K. Arendt and F. Dal Bello, 347–72. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Planchot, V., P. Colonna, and A. Buleon. 1997. Enzymatic hydrolysis of α-glucan crystallites. Carbohydrate Research 298 (4):319–26. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(96)00317-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, J. M. 1987. Gibberellic acid for fruit set and seed germination. CRFG Journal 19:10–2.
   Google Scholar
• Rosentrater, K. A., and A. D. Evers. 2018. Chapter 14. Wet milling: Separating starch, gluten (protein) and fibre. In Kent’s technology of cereals, eds. K. A. Rosentrater and A. D. Evers, 5th ed., 839–60. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, H., J. Blazek, A. Lopez-Rubio, E. P. Gilbert, T. Hanley, and L. Copeland. 2009. Structure–function relationships in a and b granules from wheat starches of similar amylose content. Carbohydrate Polymers 75 (3):420–7. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammartino, M. 2015. Enzymes in brewing. Master Brewers Association Technical Quarterly 52 (3):156–64. doi: 10.1094/tq-52-3-0818-01.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., M. Krottenthaler, W. Back, and H. Weisser. 2005. Study on the membrane filtration of mash with particular respect to the quality of wort and beer. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 111 (4):380–7. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2005.tb00223.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerritt, J. H., and P. W. Janes. 1992. Disulphide-bonded ‘gel protein’ aggregates in barley: Quality-related differences in composition and reductive dissociation. Journal of Cereal Science 16 (3):219–35. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(09)80086-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, P. T., E. D. Baxter, and T. Wainwright. 1979. Inhibition by hordein of starch degradation. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 85 (2):112–4. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1979.tb06837.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, E., A. Auer, T. Becker, and M. Gastl. 2012. Comparison of beer quality attributes between beers brewed with 100% barley malt and 100% barley raw material. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92 (4):803–13. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanston, J. S., A. Wilhelmson, A. Ritala, and B. R. Gibson. 2014. Chapter 8. Malting, brewing, and distilling. In Barley, eds. P. R. Shewry and S. E. Ullrich. 2nd ed., 193–222. Washington, DC: AACC International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szwajgier, D. 2011. Dry and wet milling of malt. A preliminary study comparing fermentable sugar, total protein, total phenolics and the ferulic acid content in non-hopped worts. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 117 (4):569–77. doi: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00505.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, H., H. Ando, K. Watanabe, Y. Takeda, and T. Mitsunaga. 2001. Fine structures of amylose and amylopectin from large, medium, and small waxy barley starch granules. Cereal Chemistry Journal 78 (2):111–5. doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.2.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafford, K., and G. B. Fincher. 2014. Chapter 4. Barley grain carbohydrates: Starch and cell walls. In Barley, eds. P. R. Shewry and S. E. Ullrich. 2nd ed., 71–95. Washington, DC: AACC International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tschoeke, I. C. P., R. J. M. C. L. Silva, J. P. da Silva, O. M. Marques, G. M. Vinhas, A. M. P. Santos, and T. P. C. Souza. 2019. Kinetic modelling of a brewery mashing: A multidimensional approach. Food and Bioproducts Processing 116:130–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2019.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasanthan, T., and R. S. Bhatty. 1996. Physicochemical properties of small- and large-granule starches of waxy, regular, and high-amylose barleys. Cereal Chemistry 73 (2):199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verive, J. M. 2017. Mash filters: Down to the very last drop. Brewing Industry Guide. https://brewingindustryguide.com/mash-filters-down-to-the-very-last-drop/.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, F. J., P. G. Royall, S. Gaisford, P. J. Butterworth, and P. R. Ellis. 2011. Binding interactions of α-amylase with starch granules: The influence of supramolecular structure and surface area. Carbohydrate Polymers 86 (2):1038–47. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, R. W. 1978. Genotypic variation in oil and protein in barley grain. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29 (11):953–8. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740291109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrell, E., C. Galitsky, and N. Martin. 2002. Energy efficiency opportunities in the brewery industry. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/881595.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., W. P. Quek, C. Li, R. G. Gilbert, and G. P. Fox. 2018. Effects of the starch molecular structures in barley malts and rice adjuncts on brewing performance. Fermentation 4 (4):103. doi: 10.3390/fermentation4040103.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., X. Tan, W. Zou, Z. Hu, G. P. Fox, M. J. Gidley, and R. G. Gilbert. 2017. Relationships between protein content, starch molecular structure and grain size in barley. Carbohydrate Polymers 155:271–9. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., K. Tao, M. J. Gidley, G. P. Fox, and R. G. Gilbert. 2019. Molecular brewing: Molecular structural effects involved in barley malting and mashing. Carbohydrate Polymers 206:583–92. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., W. Zou, S. Dhital, P. Wu, M. J. Gidley, G. P. Fox, and R. G. Gilbert. 2017. The adsorption of α-amylase on barley proteins affects the in vitro digestion of starch in barley flour. Food Chemistry 241:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar