Resilience of Microbial Systems Towards Disturbances

REFERENCES

• Andrén O., Balandreau J. Biodiversity and soil functioning—From black box to can of worms?. Applied Soil Ecology 1999; 13: 105–108, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrén O., Bengtsson J., Clarholm M. Biodiversity and species redundancy among litter decomposers. The significance and regulation of soil biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1995; 141–151
   Google Scholar
• Andrén O., Brussaard L., Clarholm M. Soil organism influence on ecosystem-level processes—Bypassing the ecological hierarchy?. Applied Soil Ecology 1999; 11: 177–188, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Aoki I. Diversity-productivity-stability relationship in freshwater ecosystems: Whole-systemic view of all trophic levels. Ecological Research 2003; 18: 397–404, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson J. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology 1998; 10: 191–199, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson J. Disturbance and resilience in soil animal communities. European Journal of Soil Biology 2002; 38: 119–125, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briones A., Raskin L. Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2003; 14: 270–276, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J. M., Abel N. From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?. Ecosystems 2001; 4: 765–781, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke K. R., Warwick R. M. Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities. Oecologia 1998; 113: 278–289, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottingham K. L., Carpenter S. R. Predictive indices of ecosystem resilience in models of north temperate lakes. Ecology 1994; 75: 2127–2138, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Curtis T. P., Sloan W. T. Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: Microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2004; 7: 221–226, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel R. The soil metagenome—A rich resource for the discovery of novel natural products. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2004; 15: 199–204, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter P. C., Neutel A. M., Moore J. C. Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science 1995; 269: 1257–1260, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelis D. L. Energy flow, nutrient and ecosystem resilience. Ecology 1980; 61: 764–771, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelis D. L., Mulholland P. J., Palumbo A. V., Steinman A. D., Huston M. A., Elwood J. W. Nutrient dynamics and food-web stability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1989; 20: 71–95, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Duelli P., Obrist M. K. Biodiversity indicators: The choice of values and measures. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 2003; 98: 87–98, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne J. A., Williams R. J., Martinez N. D. Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002; 99: 12917, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund F., Olsson S., Johansen A. Changes in the succession and diversity of protozoan and microbial populations in soil spiked with a range of copper concentrations. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2003; 35: 1507–1516, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Ekschmitt K., Griffiths B. S. Soil biodiversity and its implications for ecosystem functioning in a heterogeneous and variable environment. Applied Soil Ecology 1998; 10: 201–215, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmqvist T., Folke C., Nyström M., Peterson G., Bengtsson J., et al. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2003; 1: 488–494, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton C. S. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London 1958
   Google Scholar
• Emmerson M. C., Emmerson M. S., Emmerson C. E., Emmerson D. M. P., Emmerson D. R. Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Nature 2001; 411: 73–77, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyers L., George I., Schuler L., Stenuit B., Agathos S. N., El Fantroussi S. Environmental genomics: Exploring the unmined richness of microbes to degrade xenobiotics. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2004; 66: 123–130, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Feris K. P., Ramsey P. W., Rillig M., Gannon J. E., Holben W. E., Moore J. N. Determining rates of change and evaluating group-level resiliency differences in hyporheic microbial communities in response to fluvial heavy-metal deposition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004; 70: 4756–4765, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez A., Huang S., Seston S, Xing J., Hickey R., et al. How stable is stable? Function versus community composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1999; 65: 3697–3704, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez A. S., Hashsham S. A., Dollhopf S. L., Raskin L., Glagoleva O., et al. Flexible community structure correlates with stable community function in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2000; 66: 4058–4067, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C. S., Walker B. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 2002; 31: 437–440, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C., Elmqvist T., Carpenter S., Walker B., Scheffer M., et al. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology. Evolution, and Systematics 2004; 35: 557–581, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givnish T. J., Tilman D., Downing J. A., Wedin D. A. Does diversity beget stability?. Nature 1994; 371: 113–114, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Grayston S. J., Campbell C. D., Millard P., Mawdsley J. L., Clegg C. D., et al. Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques. Applied Soil Ecology 2004; 25: 63–84, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths B. S., Hallett P., Kuan H., Pitkin Y., Aitken M. Biological and physical resilience of soil amended with heavy metal-contaminated sewage sludge. European Journal of Soil Science 2005; 56: 197–205, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths B. S., Kuan H. L., Ritz K., Glover L. A., McCaig A. E., Fenwick C. The relationship between microbial community structure and functional stability, tested experimentally in an upland pasture soil. Microbial Ecology 2004; 47: 104–113, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths B. S., Ritz K., Bardgett R. D., Cook R., Christensen S., et al. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 2000; 90: 279–294, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths B. S., Ritz K., Wheatley R., Kuan H. L., Boag B., et al. An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in arable soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2001; 33: 1713–1722, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grime P. Plants hold the key. Ecosystem in a changing world. Biologist 2003; 50: 87–91, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Guichard F., Levin S. A., Hastings A., Siegel D. Toward a dynamic metacommunity approach to marine reserve theory. BioScience 2004; 54: 1003–1011, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson L. H. Ecological resilience—In theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2000; 31: 425–439, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Häggblom M. M., Knight V. K., Kerkhof L. J. Anaerobic decomposition of halogenated aromatic compounds. Environmental Pollution 2000; 107: 199–207, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann M., Kölliker R., Widmer F., Frey B. Semi-automated genetic analyses of soil microbial communities: Comparison of T-RFLP and RISA based on descriptive and discriminative statistical approaches. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2005; 61: 349–360, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashsham S. A., Fernandez A. S., Dollhopf S. L., Dazzo F. B., Hickey R. F., et al. Parallel processing of substrate correlates with greater functional stability in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2000; 66: 4050–4057, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings A. Transients: The key to long-term ecological understanding?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004; 19: 39–45, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemsbergen D. A., Berg M. P., Verhoef H. A., Heemsbergen D. A., Van Hal J. R., et al. Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 2004; 306: 1019–1020, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling C. S. Resilience and stability of ecologycal systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1973; 4: 1–23, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Holling C. S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1996a
   Google Scholar
• Holling C. S. Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecological Applications 1996b; 6: 733–735, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugenholtz P., Goebel B. M., Pace N. R. Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. Journal of Bacteriology 1998; 180: 4765–4774, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulot F. D., Lacroix G., Lescher-Moutoue F., Loreau M. Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment. Nature 2000; 405: 340–344, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxel G. R., McCann K. Food web stability: The influence of trophic flows across habitats. American Naturalist 1998; 152: 460–469, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J. L., Wiechelt S. A. Introduction to the special issue on resilience. Substance Use and Misuse 2004; 39: 657–670, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkoris G. D., Jansen V. A.A., Loreau M., Troumbis A. Y. Variability in interaction strength and implications for biodiversity. Journal of Animal Ecology 2002; 71: 362–371, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Lal R. Degradation and resilience of soils. Phil. Trans. R. Lond. B 1997; 352: 997–1010, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton J. H., Naeem S., Thompson L. J., Hector A., Crawley M. J., et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: Getting the Ecotron experiment in its correct context. Functional Ecology 1998; 12: 848–853, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Leibold M. A., Holyoak M., Mouquet N., Amarasekare P., Chase J. M., et al. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 2004; 7: 601–613, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W. T., Zhu L. Environmental microbiology-on-a-chip and its future impacts. Trends in Biotechnology 2005; 23: 174–179, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998; 95: 5632–5636, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Recent theoretical advances. Oikos 2000; 91: 3–17, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreau M. Microbial diversity, producer-decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: A theoretical model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London—Biological Sciences 2001; 268: 303–309, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Loreau M. Does functional redundancy exist?. Oikos 2004; 104: 606–611, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreau M., Loreau S. N., Loreau P. I., Loreau J. B., Loreau J. P. G., et al. Ecology: Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science 2001; 294: 804–808, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch J. M. Resilience of the rhizosphere to anthropogenic disturbance. Biodegradation 2002; 13: 21–27, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch J. M., Benedetti A., Insam H., Nuti M. P., Smalla K., et al. Microbial diversity in soil: Ecological theories, the contribution of molecular techniques and the impact of transgenic plants and transgenic microorganisms. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2004; 40: 363–385, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur R. Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability. Ecology 1955; 36: 533–536, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez N. D. Constant connectance in community food webs. American Naturalist 1992; 139: 1208–1218, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• May R. M. How many species are there on earth?. Science 1988; 241: 1441–1449, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann K. S. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 2000; 405: 228–233, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrady-Steed J., Harris P. M., Morin P. J. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Letters to Nature 1997; 390: 162–165, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouquet N., Loreau M. Coexistence in metacommunities: The regional similarity hypothesis. American Naturalist 2002; 159: 420–426, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller A. K., Westergaard K., Sørensen S. J., Christensen S. The diversity and function of soil microbial communities exposed to different disturbances. Microbial Ecology 2002; 44: 49–58, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem S. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: The evolution of a paradigm. Ecology 2002; 83: 1537–1552, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem S., Li S. A more reliable design for biodiversity study?. Nature 1998; 394: 30, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Nannipieri P., Ascher J., Ceccherini M. T., Landi L., Pietramellara G., Renella G. Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science 2003; 54: 655–670, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orwin K. H., Wardle D. A. New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2004; 36: 1907–1912, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A. V., Schryver J. C., Fields M. W., Bagwell C. E., Zhou J. Z., et al. Coupling of functional gene diversity and geochemical data from environmental samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2004; 70: 6525–6534, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson G., Craig R. A., Holling C. S. Original articles: Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1998; 1: 6–18, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjard L., Lejon D. P.H., Mougel C., Chaussod R., Schehrer L., Merdinoglu D. Sampling strategy in molecular microbial ecology: Influence of soil sample size on DNA fingerprinting analysis of fungal and bacterial communities. Environmental Microbiology 2003; 5: 1111–1120, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesenfeld C. S., Schloss P. D., Handelsman J. Metagenomics: Genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annual Review of Genetics 2004; 38: 525–552, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Valera F. Approaches to prokaryotic biodiversity: A population genetics perspective. Environmental Microbiology 2002; 4: 628–633, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer M., Carpenter S., Foley J. A., Folke C., Walker B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 2001; 413: 591–596, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer M., Carpenter S. R. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2003; 18: 648–656, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz M. W., Brigham C. A., Hoeksema J. D., Lyons K. G., Mills M. H., Van Mantgem P. J. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: Implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 2000; 122: 297–305, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer D., Kunwar A., Chowdhury D. Evolutionary ecology in silico: Evolving food webs, migrating population and speciation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2005; 352: 202–215, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Stone L., Gabric A., Berman T. Ecosystem resilience, stability, and productivity: Seeking a relationship. American Naturalist 1996; 148: 892–903, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Streit W. R., Schmitz R. A. Metagenomics—The key to the uncultured microbes. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2004; 7: 492–498, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D., Downing J. A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 1994; 367: 363–365, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulanowicz R. E. Some steps toward a central theory of ecosystem dynamics. Computational Biology and Chemistry 2003; 27: 523–530, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Straalen N. M. Assessment of soil contamination—A functional perspective. Biodegradation 2002; 13: 41–52, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology 1995; 9: 747–752, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B., Anderies J., Abel N., Carpenter S., Peterson G. D., et al. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology 2002; 6, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Walker B. H. Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy. Conservation Biology 1992; 6: 18–23, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller M. A. Resilience in ecosystemic context: Evolution of the concept. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2001; 71: 290–297, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter G. G. Stability and structure of compartmental models of ecosystems. Mathematical Biosciences 1980; 51: 1–10, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard K., Müller A. K., Christensen S., Bloem J., Sørensen S. J. The effect of Tylosin as a Disturbance on the Soil Microbial Communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2001; 33: 2061–2071, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yodzis P. The compartmentation of real and assembled ecosystems. American Naturalist 1982; 120: 551–570, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar