Conventional and Molecular Methods for Understanding Probiotic Bacteria Functionality in Gastrointestinal Tracts

REFERENCES

• Soerjadi, A. S., Stehman, S. M., Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M., and Smyser, C. F., Some measurements of protection against paratyphoid Salmonella and Escherichia coli by competitive exclusion in chickens, Avian Dis., 25, 706, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hudault, S., Bewa, H., Bridonneau, C., and Raibaud, P., Efficiency of various bacterial suspensions derived from cecal floras of conventional chickens in reducing the population level of Salmonella typhimurium in gnotobiotic mice and chicken intestines, Can. J. Microbiol., 31, 832, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Stavric, S., Microbial colonization control of chicken intestine using defined cultures, Food Technol., 41, 93, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi, E. and Rantala, M., New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production, Nature, 241, 210, 1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M., and Smyser, C. F., Protecting chicks and poults from salmonellae by oral administration of “normal” gut microflora, Avian Dis., 22, 273, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivnick, H., Blanchfield, B., and D’Aoust, J.-Y., Prevention of Salmonella infection in chicks by treatment with fecal cultures from mature chickens (Nurmi cultures), J. Food Prot., 44, 909,1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mead, G. C. and Impey, C. S., Application of competitive exclusion principle for preventing Salmonella colonisation in the newly hatched chick, J. Sci. Food. Agric., 34, 633, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Wierup, M., Wold-Troell, M., Nurmi, E., and Häkkinen, M., Epidemiological evaluation of the Salmonella-controlling effect of nationwide use of a competitive exclusion culture in poultry, Poultry Sci., 67, 1026, 1988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gleeson, T. M., Stavric, S., and Blanchfield, B., Protection of chicks against Salmonella infection with a mixture of pure cultures of intestinal bacteria, Avian Dis., 33, 636, 1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impey, C. S. and Mead, G. C., Fate of salmo-nellas in the alimentary tract of chicks pre-treat-ed with a mature caecal microflora to increase colonization resistance, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 66, 469, 1989.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corrier, D. E., Nisbet, D. J., Scanlan, C. M., Tellez, G., Hargis, B. M., and DeLoach, J. R., Inhibition of Salmonella enteritidis cecal and organ colonization in leghorn chicks by a defined culture of cecal bacteria and dietary lactose, J. Food Prot., 57, 377, 1994.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stavric, S. and D’Aoust, J-Y., Undefined and defined bacterial preparations for the competitive exclusion of Salmonella in poultry: a review, J. Food Prot., 56, 173, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyofo, B. A., DeLoach, J. R., Corrier, D. E., Norman, J. O., Ziprin, R. L., and Mollen-haur, H. H., Effect of carbohydrates on Salmonella typhimurium colonization in broiler chickens, Avian Dis., 33, 531, 1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrier, D. E., Hinton, A., Jr., Ziprin, R. L., and DeLoach, J. R., Effect of dietary lactose on Salmonella colonization in market-age broiler chickens, Avian Dis., 34, 668, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, A., Jr., Corrier, D. E., Spates, G. E., Norman, J. O., Ziprin, R. L., Beier, R. C., and DeLoach, J. R., Biological control of Salmonella typhimurium in young chickens, Avian Dis., 34, 626, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziprin, R. L., Corrier, D. E., Hinton, A., Jr., Beier, R. C., Spates, G. E., DeLoach, J. R., and Elissalde, M. H., Intracloacal Salmonella typhimurium infection of broiler chickens: reduction of colonization with anaerobic organisms and dietary lactose, Avian Dis., 34, 749, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, A., Jr., Corrier, D. E., and DeLoach, J. R., In vitro inhibition of Salmonella typhimu-rium and Escherichia coli O157: H7by an anaerobic Gram-positive coccus isolated from the cecal contents of adult chickens, J. Food Prot., 55, 162, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Corrier, D. E., Hinton, A., Jr., Kubena, L. F., Ziprin, R. L., and DeLoach, J. R., Decreased Salmonella colonization in turkey poults inoculated with anaerobic cecal microflora and provided dietary lactose, Poultry Sci., 70, 1345, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nisbet, D. J., Corrier, D. E., and DeLoach, J. R., Effect of mixed cecal microflora maintained in continuous culture and of dietary lactose on Salmonella typhimurium colonization in broiler chicks, Avian Dis., 37, 528, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, D. J., Corrier, D. E., Ricke, S. C., Hume, M. E., Byrd II, J. A., and DeLoach, J. R., Maintenance of the biological efficacy in chicks of a cecal competitive-exclusion culture against Salmonella by continuous-flow fermentation, J. Food Protect., 59, 1279, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, D. J., Corrier, D. E., Scanlan, C. M., Hollister, A. G., Beier, R. C., and DeLoach, J. R., Effect of a defined continuous-flow derived bacterial culture and dietary lactose on Salmonella typhimurium colonization in broiler chickens, Avian Dis., 37, 1017, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranki, A. and Freter, R., Use of anaerobic glove boxes for the cultivation of strictly anaerobic bacteria, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 25, 1329, 1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenwirth, A. C., Evolution of anaerobic methodology, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 25, 1295, 1972.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hungate, R. E., A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes, in Methods in Microbiology., Norris, J. R. and Ribbons, D. W., Eds., Vol. 3B., Academic Press, New York, 1969, 117.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. H. and Hungate, R. E., Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium ruminan-tium n.sp., J. Bacteriol., 75, 713, 1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungate, R. E., The anaerobic mesophilic cel-lulolytic bacteria, Bacteriol. Rev., 14, 1, 1950.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balch, W. E., Fox, G. E., Magrum, L. J., Woese, C. R., and Wolfe, R. S., Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group, Mi-crobiol. Rev., 43, 260, 1979.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant, M. P., Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 25, 1324, 1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdeman, L. V., Cato, E. P., and Moore, W. E. C. Eds., Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 4th Edition. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Macy, J. M., Snellen, J. E., and Hungate, R. E., Use of syringe methods for anaerobiosis, Amr. J. Clin. Nutr., 25, 1318, 1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. L. and Wolin, M. J., A serum bottle modification of the Hungate technique for cultivating obligate anaerobes, Appl. Microbiol., 27, 985, 1974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aranki, A., Syed, S. A., Kenney, E. B., and Freter, R., Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse cecum by means of a simplified glove box procedure, Appl. Microbi-ol., 17, 568, 1969.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosebury, T. and Reynolds, J. B., Continuous anaerobiosis for cultivation of spirochetes, Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 117, 813, 1964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socransky, S. S., MacDonald, J. B., and Sawyer, S., The cultivation of Treponema microden-tium as surface colonies, Arch. Oral Biol., 1, 171, 1959.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spears, R. W. and Freter, R., Improved isolation of anaerobic bacteria from the mouse cecum by maintiaining continuous strict anaerobiosis, Proc. Exp. Biol. Med., 124, 903, 1967.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drasar, B. S., Cultivation of anaerobic intestinal bacteria, J. Pathol. Bacteriol., 94, 417, 1967.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leedle, J. A. Z. and Hespell, R. B., Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 39, 709, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, W. C. and Hentges, D. J., Differential effects of oxygen and oxidation- reduction potential on the multiplication of three species of anaerobic intestinal bacteria, Appl. Microbiol., 30, 781, 1975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brock, T. D. and O’Dea, K., Amorphous ferrous sulfide as a reducing agent for culture of anaerobes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 33, 254, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. A. and Pickard M. D., Effect of titanium (III) citrate as reducing agent on growth of rumen bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 39, 1144, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moench, T. T. and Zeikus, J. G., An improved preparation method for a titanium (III) media re-ductant, J. Microbiol. Methods, 1, 199, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, S. C. and Schaefer, D. M., An ascor-bate-reduced medium for nitrogen metabolism studies with Selenomonas ruminantium, J. Mi-crobiol. Methods, 11, 219, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, S. C., Schaefer, D. M., and Chang, T. S., Influence of methylamine on anaerobic rumen bacterial growth and plant fiber digestion, Bioresource Technol., 50, 253, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, S. C. and Schaefer, D. M., Growth and fermentation responses of Selenomonas ruminantium to limiting and non-limiting concentrations of ammonium chloride, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 46, 169, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, M. P., Bacterial species of the rumen, Bacteriol. Rev., 23, 125, 1959.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer, P. and Sahm, H., Influence of sulfur-containing compounds on the growth of Metha-nosarcina barkeri in defined medium, Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 12, 28, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Wachenheim, D. E. and Hespell, R. B. Inhibitory effects of titanium (III) citrate on enumeration of bacteria from rumen contents, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 48, 444, 1984.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John, A., Isaacson, H. R., and Bryant, M. P., Isolation and characteristics of a ureolytic strain of Selenomonas ruminantium, J. Dairy Sci., 57, 1003, 1974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricke, S. C. and Schaefer, D. M., Combination of dithriothreitol and sulfide as reductants in nitrogen-free minimal media for growth of anaerobic ruminal bacteria and Prevotella rumincola B14 on ammonia, J. Rapid Meth. Automation Microbiol., 6, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. M., Davis, C. L., and Bryant, M. P., Ammonia saturation constants for predominant species of rumen bacteria, J. Dairy Sci., 63, 1248, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. J., Hespell, R. B., and Bryant, M. P., Ammonia assimilation and glutamate formation in the anaerobe Selenomonas ruminantium, J. Bacteriol., 141, 593, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, C. J., Hespell, R. B., and Bryant, M. P., Regulation of urease and ammonia assimilatory enzymes in Selenomonas ruminantium, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 42, 89, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. and Coates, M. E., Influence of the intestinal microflora on nutrition., in Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl., Freeman, B. M., Ed., Vol. 4., Academic Press, New York, 1983, 51.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, I. M., Allison, M. J., and Bucklin, J. A., Characterization of the cecal bacteria of normal pigs, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 41, 950, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanitro, J. P., Fairchilds, I. G., and Zgornicki, Y. D., Isolation, culture characteristics and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum, Appl. Microbiol., 27, 678, 1974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salanitro, J. P., Blake, I. G., and Muirhead, P. A., Studies on the cecal microflora of commercial broiler chickens, Appl. Microbiol., 28, 439, 1974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snoeyenbos, G. H., Pullorum disease, in Diseases of Poultry., Hofstad, M. S., Barnes, H. J., Calnek, B. W., Reid, W. M., and Yoder, H. W., Jr., Eds., 8th Ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1984, 66.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, M. J., Robinson, I. M., Bucklin, J. A., and Booth, G. D., Comparison of bacterial populations of the pig cecum and colon based upon enumeration with specific energy sources, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 37, 1142, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehority, B. A. and Grubb, J. A., Basal medium for the selective enumeration of rumen bacteria utilizing specific energy sources, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 32, 703, 1976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricke, S. C., Nisbet, D. J., Shermer, C. L., Corrier, D. E., and DeLoach, J. R., Utilization of a rumen fluid differential carbohydrate media for the selective enumeration of the cecal bacterial population of broiler chicks, Poultry Sci., 72 (Abstr., Suppl. 1), 187, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Y-Y., Ricke, S. C., Scanlan, C. M., Nisbet, D. J., Vargas-Moskola, A. A., Corrier, D. E., and DeLoach, J. R., Use of a differential rumen fluid-based carbohydrate agar media for culturing lactose-selected cecal bacteria from chickens, J. Food Prot., 58, 361, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciorowski, K. G., Turner, N. D., Lupton, J. R., Chapkin, R. S., Shermer, C. L., Ha, S. D., and Ricke, S. C., Diet and carcinogen alter the fecal microbial populations of rats, J. Nu-tr., 127, 449, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shermer, C. L., Maciorowski, K. G., Bailey, C. A., Byers, F. M., and Ricke, S. C., Caecal metabolites and microbial populations in chickens consuming diets containing a mined humate compound, J. Sci. Food Agric., 77, 479, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. B. and Baldwin, R. L., Substrate preferences in rumen bacteria: evidence of catabolite regulatory mechanisms, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 36, 319, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. B. and Baldwin, R.L., Comparison of substrate affinities among several rumen bacteria: a possible determinant of rumen bacterial competition, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 37, 531, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. B., Factors influencing competition and composition of the rumen bacterial flora, in Herbivore Nutrition in the Subtropics and Tropics., Gilchrist, F. M. C. and Mackie, R. I., Eds., The Science Press (PTY), South Africa, 1984, 313.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, S. C., Schaefer, D. M., Cook, M. E., and Kang, K. H., Differentiation of ruminal bacterial species by enzyme-linked immunosor-bent assay using egg yolk antibodies from immunized chicken hens, Appl. Environ. Microbi-ol., 54, 596, 1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricke, S. C. and Schaefer, D. M., Characterization of egg yolk antibodies for detection and quantification of rumen Selenomonas ruminan-tium using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 2795, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazlewood, G. P., Theodorou, M. K., Hutch-ings, A., Jordan, D. J., and Galfre, G., Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to a Butyrivibrio sp. and their potential use in the identification of rumen butyrivibrios, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, J. Gen. Microbiol., 132, 43, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, J. D. and Stokes, B., Monoclonal antibodies against the ruminal bacterium Selenom-onas ruminantium, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 2193, 1990.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young, C. R., Nisbet, D. J., Stanker, L. H., and DeLoach, J. R., Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to microorganisms contained in a continuous culture that protects chicks against salmonellae colonization, American Society for Microbiology, 96th Gen Meet. Abstract P 33, 374, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Corrier, D. E., Nisbet, D. J., Scanlan, C. M., Hollister, A. G., and DeLoach, J. R., Control of Salmonella typhimurium colonization in broiler chicks with a continuous-flow characterized mixed culture of cecal bacteria, Poultry Sci., 74, 916, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C. R., Nisbet, D. J., Stanker, L. H., and DeLoach, J. R., Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to a Veillonella species from a continuous- flow culture system of chicken cecal bacteria, Anaerobe, 3, 27, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durant, J. A., Young, C. R., Nisbet, D. J., Stanker, L. H., and Ricke, S. C., Detection and quantification of poultry probiotic bacteria in mixed culture using monoclonal antibodies in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 38, 181, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droleskey, R. E., Corrier, D. E., Nisbet, D. J., and DeLoach, J. R., Colonization of cecal mu-cosal epithelium in chicks treated with a continuous flow culture of 29 characterized bacteria: confirmation by scanning electron microscopy, J. Food Protect., 58, 837, 1995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooker, J. D., Zhang, N. and Stokes, B., Monoclonal antibodies and gene probes for rumen microbial analysis, in The Rumen Ecosyt-sem-The Microbial Metabolism and Its Regulation., Hoshino, S., Onodera, R., Minato, H., and Itabashi, H., Eds., Japan Scientific Societies Press Tokyo, Japan, 1990, 203.
   Google Scholar
• Amann, R. I., Binder, B. J. Olson, R. J., Chisholm, S. W., Devereux, R., and Stahl, D. A., Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligo-nucelotides probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 1919, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann, R. I., Krumholz, L., and Stahl, D. A., Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology, J. Bacteriol., 172, 762, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, E. F., Archaea in coastal marine environments, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 5685, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenyo, A. A., Mackie, R. I., Stahl, D. A., and White, B. A., The use of 16S rRNA targeted oli-gonucelotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: development of probes for Ruminococcus species and evidence for bacteriocin production, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 3688, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W., and Schleifer, K.-H., Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation, Mi-crobiol. Rev., 59, 143, 1995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson, G. R., Saavedra, Macfarlane, S., and MacFarlane, G. T., Probiotics and intestinal infections, in Probiotics 2— Applications and Practical Aspects., Fuller, R., Ed., Chapman & Hall, 1997, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, D. C., Factors influencing biocontrol of bacterial pathogens in the intestine, Food Tech-nol., 41, 82, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R., A review-probiotics in man and animals, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 66, 365, 1989.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller, R., Probiotics in human medicine, Gut, 32, 439, 1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentges, D. J., Gut flora and disease resistance., in Probiotics—The Scientific Basis., Fuller, R., Ed., Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1992, 87.
   Google Scholar
• Stavric, S., Defined cultures and prospects, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 15, 245, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, R. I., Gut environment and evolution of mutualistic fermentative digestion, in Gastrointestinal Microbiology Vol. 1—Gastrointes-tinal Ecosystems and Fermentations., Mackie, R. I. and White, B. A., Eds., Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, R. D., Colonization resistance, in Gastrointestinal Microbiology Vol. 2— Gastrointestinal Microbes and Host Interactions., Mackie, R. I. and White, B. A., Eds., Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997, 501.
   Google Scholar
• Vispo, C. and Karasov, W. H., The interaction of avian gut microbes and their host: An elusive symbiosis, in Gastrointestinal Microbiology Vol. 1— Gastrointestinal Ecosystems and Fermentations., Mackie, R. I. and White, B. A., Eds., Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997, 116.
   Google Scholar
• Welling, G. W., Elfferich, P.,Raangs, G. C.,Wildeboer-Veloo, A. CM., Jansen, G. J., and Degener, J. E., 16S ribosomal RNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for monitoring of intestinal tract bacteria, Scand. J. Gastroen-terol., 32 (Suppl. 222), 17, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, L., Stromley, J. M., Rittmann, B. E., and Stahl, D. A., Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 1232, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, W. E. C. and Holdeman, L. V., Human fecal flora: the normal flora of 20 Japanese-Ha-waiians, Appl. Microbiol., 27, 961, 1974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holdeman, L. V., Good, I. J. and Moore, W. E. C., Human fecal flora: variation in bacterial composition within individuals and a possible effect of emotional stress. Appl. Environ. Mi-crobiol., 31, 359, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasar, B. S. and Roberts, A. K. Control of the large bowel microflora., in Human Microbial Ecology., Hill, M. J. and Marsh, P. D., Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1990, 87.
   Google Scholar
• Borriello, S. P. Microbial flora in the gastrointestinal tract, in Microbial Metabolism in the Digestive Tract., Hill, M. J., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1986, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rumney, C. J. and Rowland, I. R. In vivo and in vitro models of the human colonic microflora, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutrit, 31, 299,1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ballongue, J., Technical problems related to in vitro study of colon flora, Scand. J. Gastroen-terol. 32 (Suppl. 222), 14, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, T., Morotomi, M., and Tanaka, R., Species-specific oligonucelotide probes for five Bifidobacterium species detected in human intestinal microflora, Appl. Environ. Micobiol., 58, 4076, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langendijk, P. S., Schut, F., Jansen, G. J., Raangs, G. C., Kamphuis, G. R., Wilkinson, M. H. F., and Welling, G. W., Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Bifidobacteri-um spp. with genus-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes and its application in fecal samples, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 3069, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, L., Capman, W. C., Sharp, R., Poulsen, L. K. and Stahl, D. A., Molecular ecology of gastrointestinal ecosystems, in Gastrointestinal Microbiology vol. 2—Gastrointes-tinal Microbes and Host Interactions., Mackie, R. I. and White, B. A., Eds., Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997, 243.
   Google Scholar
• Kuritza, A. P. and Salyers, A. A., Use of a species-specific DNA hybridization probe for enumerating Bacteroides vulgatus in human feces, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 50, 958, 1985.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuritza, A. P., Shaughnessy, P., and Salyers, A. A., Enumeration of polysaccharide- degrading Bacteroides species in human feces using species-specific DNA probes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 385, 1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, E. and Kandler, O., DNA-DNA homol-ogy, murein types, and enzyme patterns in the type strains of the genus Bifidobacterium, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 4, 42, 1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugita, H., Nakamura, T., and Deguchi, Y., Identification of Plesiomonas shigelloides isolated from freshwater fish with the microplate hybridization method, J. Food Prot., 56, 949, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannock, G. W., McConnell, M. A., and Fuller, R., A note on the use of a plasmid as a DNA probe in the detection of a Lactobacillus fermentum strain in porcine stomach contents, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 73, 60, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, R., Hazlewood, G. P., Gilbert, H. J., and O’Donnell, A. G., Unmodified and recombinant strains of Lactobacillus plantarum are rapidly lost from the rumen by protozoal predation, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 76, 110, 1994.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morotomi, M., Ohno, T., and Mutai, M., Rapid and correct identification of intestinal Bacteroides spp.with chromosomal DNA probes by whole-cell dot blot hybridization, Ap-pl. Environ. Microbiol., 54, 1158, 1988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flint, H. J., McPherson, C. A., Avgustin, G., and Stewart, C. S., Use of a cellulase- encoding gene probe to reveal restriction fragment length polymorphisms among ruminal strains of Bacteroides succinogenes, Curr. Microbiol., 20, 63, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ning, Z., Attwood, G. T., Lockington, R. A., and Brooker, J. D., Genetic diversity in ruminal isolates of Selenomonas ruminantum, Curr. Mi-crobiol., 22, 279, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hudman, J. F. and Gregg, K., Genetic diversity among strains of bacteria from the rumen, Curr. Microbiol., 19, 313, 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann, R. I., Zarda, B., Stahl, D. A., and Schleifer, K-H., Identification of individual prokaryotic cells by using enzyme-labeled, rR-NA–targeted oligonucelotide probes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 3007, 1992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, E. F., Wu, K. Y., Prézelin, B. B., and Jovine, R. V. M., High abundance of Archaea in Antarctic marine picoplankton, Nature, 371, 695, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, D. A., Phylogenetically based studies of microbial ecosystem perturbation, in Biotechnology for Crop Protection, Hedin, P. A., Menn, J. J., and Hollingsworth, R. M., Eds., American Chemical Society Symposium, Series 379, Washington, D.C., American Chemical Society, 1988, 373.
   Google Scholar
• Briesacher, S. L., May, T., Grigsby, K. N., Kerley, M. S., Anthony, R. V., and Paterson, J. A., Use of DNA probes to monitor nutritional effects on ruminal prokaryotes and Fibrobacter succinogenes S85, J. Animal Sci., 70, 289, 1992.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zarda, B., Amann, R., Wallner, G., and Schleifer, K-H., Identification of single bacterial cells using digoxigenin-labeled, rRNA-target-ed oligonucleotides, J. Gen. Microbiol., 137, 2823, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poulsen, L. K., Ballard, G., and Stahl, D. A., Use of rRNA fluoresence in situ hybridization for measuring the activity of single cells in young and established biofilms, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 1354, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, L. K., Lan, F., Kristensen, C. S., Hobolth, P., Molin, S., and Krogfelt, K. A., Spatial distribution of Escherichia coli in the mouse large intestine inferred from rRNA in situ hybridization, Inf. Immun., 62, 5191, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann, R. I., Personal communication, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, B. J., Esteban, G., Clarke, K. J., Williams, A. G., Embley, T. M., and Hirt, R. P., Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic meth-anogens, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 117, 157, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore, J. and Stahl, D. A., Phylogeny of anaerobic rumen Chytridiomycetes inferred from small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence comparisons, Can. J. Botany, 69, 1964, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• McSweeney, C. S., Mackie, R. I., Odenyo, A. A., and Stahl, D. A., Development of an oli-gonucleotide probe targeting 16S rRNA and its application for detection and quantitation of the ruminal bacterium Synergistes jonesii in a mixed-population chemostat, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 1607, 1993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voordouw, G., Shen, Y., Harrington, C. S., Telang, A. J., Jack, T. R., and Westlake, D. W. S., Quantitative reverse sample genome probing of microbial communities and its application to oil field production waters, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 4101, 1993.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guschin, D. Y., Mobarry, B. K., Proudnikov, D., Stahl, D. A., Rittman, B. E., and Mirza-bekov, A. D., Oligonucleotide microchips as genosensors for determinative and environmental studies in microbiology, Appl. Environ. Mi-crobiol., 63, 2397, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai, S. D., Rapid molecular detection of microbial pathogens, Arch. Virol. (Suppl. 13), 67, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Pillai, S. D., Ricke, S. C., Nisbet, D. J., Corri-er, D. E., and DeLoach, J. R., A rapid method for screening for Salmonella typhimurium in a chicken cecal consortium using gene amplification, Avian Dis., 38, 598, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai, S. D. and Ricke, S. C., Strategies to improve the applicability of gene amplification protocols for pathogen detection in meat and meat products, Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 21, 239, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candrian, U., Polymerase chain reaction in food microbiology, J. Microbiol. Methods, 23, 89, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Persing, D. H., In vitro nucleic acid amplification techniques, in Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications, Persing, D. H., Smith, T. F., Tenovar, F. C., and White, J. J., Eds., American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. 1993, 51.
   Google Scholar
• Maciorowski, K. G., Peña, J., Pillai, S. D., and Ricke, S. C., Application of gene amplification in conjunction with a hybridization sensor for rapid detection of Salmonella spp. and fecal contamination indicators in animal feeds, J. Rapid. Meth. Automation Microbiol., 6, 225, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, I. G., Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification, Appl. Environ. Micro-biol., 63, 3741, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichard, S. L. and Paul, J. H., Detection of gene expression in genetically engineered microorganisms and natural phytoplankton populations in the marine environment by mRNA analysis, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57, 1721, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming, J. T., Sanseverino, T., and Sayler, G. S., Quantitative relationship between naphthalene catabolic gene frequency and expression in predicting PAH digestion in soils at town gas manufacturing sites., Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 1068, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W. W., and Prasher, D. C., Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression, Science, 263, 802, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P. J., Swift, S., and Stewart, G. S. A. B., PCR-based gene engineering of the Vibrio har-veyi lux operon and the Escherichia coli trp op-eron provides for biochemically functional native and fused gene products, Mol. Gen. Genet., 226, 41, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, K. W. and Pillai, S. D., Evaluation of protocols for reliable extraction of total RNA from soils, Abstr. Ann. Mtg. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Indianapolis, IN, Oct., 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Göbel, U. B., Geiser, A., and Stanbridge, E. J., Oligonucleotide probes complementary to variable regions of ribosomal RNA discriminate between Mycoplasma species, J. Gen. Microbiol., 133, 1969, 1987.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pepper, I. L. and Pillai, S. D., Detection of specific DNA sequences in environmental samples via polymerase chain reaction, in Ch 43. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties, Weaver, R. W., Angle, J. S., and Bottomley, P. S., Eds., SSSA Book Series No. 5., 707, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, E. W., Oerther, D. B., Larsen, N., Stahl, D. A., and Raskin, L., The oligonucleotide probe database, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 3557, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillai, S. D., Unpublished data, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, J., Shermer, C. L., Pillai, S. D., and Ricke, S. C., Rapid detection of pathogenic bacterial genera in aerosols using a novel dual probe hybridization assay in combination with polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Institute of Food Science and Engineering’s Research & Technology Transfer Symposium, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, September 30, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, J., Ricke, S. C., Shermer, C. L., Gibbs, T., and Pillai, S. D., Efficacy of gene amplification in conjunction with a hybridization sensor to rapidly detect airborne bacterial pathogens, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A (in press), 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Shermer, C. L., Kwon, Y. M., Pillai, S. D., Peña, J., Corrier, D. E., Maciorowski, K. G., and Ricke, S. C., Comparison of litter and air filter sampling of broilers inoculated with Salmonella typhimurium using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), selective enrichments, and plate enumerations, Institute of Food Science and Engineering’s Research & Technology Transfer Symposium, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, September 30, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, W. P., Kelly, P. M., Morelli, L., and Collins, J. K., Selective detection, enumeration and identification of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in mixed bacterial populations, Int. J. Food Micro-biol., 35, 1, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, D. O., White, B. A., and Mackie, R. I., Ribotyping of adherent Lactobacillus from weaning pigs: a basis for probiotic selection based on diet and gut compartment, Anaerobe, 3, 317, 1997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman, M. E., Dreesen, D. W., and Wiegert, R. G. A simulation of microbial competition in the human colonic ecosytem, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 3632, 1996.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pace, N. R., Stahl, D. A., Lane, D. J. and Olsen, G. J., The analysis of natural microbial populations by ribosomal RNA sequences, in Advances in Microbial Ecology., Marshall, K. C., Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1986, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Devereux, R., Kane, M. D., Winfrey, J., and Stahl, D. A., Genus- and group-specific hybridization probes for determinative and environmental studies of sulfate-reducing bacteria, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 15, 601, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogfelt, K. A., Poulsen, L. K., and Molin, S., Identification of coccoid Escherichia coli BJ4 cells in the large intestine of streptomycin-treated mice, Inf. Immun., 61, 5029, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar