What Happens During Language and Literacy Coaching? Coaches’ Reports of Their Interactions With Educators

References

• Aikens, N., & Akers, L. (2011). Background review of existing literature on coaching. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ashiabi, G. S. (2007). Play in the preschool classroom: Its socioemotional significance and the teacher’s role in play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 199–207. doi:10.1007/s10643-007-0165-8
   Google Scholar
• Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. S. (2011). Analyzing teacher participation in literacy coaching activities. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 356–382. doi:10.1086/661994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, R. M., Draper, J. A., Hall, V., Vandermolen, J., & Zigmond, N. (2010). Coaches and coaching in Reading First schools: A reality check. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 87–114. doi:10.1086/653471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 7–34. doi:10.1086/653468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Buysse, V., Winton, P. J., & Rous, B. (2009). Reaching consensus on a definition of professional development for the early childhood field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 235–243. doi:10.1177/0271121408328173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabell, S. Q., DeCoster, J., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Variation in the effectiveness of instructional interactions across preschool classroom settings and learning activities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 820–830. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4, 5–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., Little, M., Rawlinson, D., Simmons, D., Kwok, O., Kim, M., … Civetelli, C. (2013). Replicating the impact of a supplemental beginning reading intervention: The role of instructional context. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 1–23. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.706694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deussen, T., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Autio, E. (2007). “Coach” can mean many things: Five categories of literacy coaches in Reading First (REL 2007-005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, K. E., & Powell, D. R. (2011). An iterative approach to the development of a professional development intervention for Head Start teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 75–93. doi:10.1177/1053815111400416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, D. K., Darrow, C. L., & Tinubu, T. A. (2008). Patterns of teacher–child conversations in Head Start classrooms: Implications for an empirically grounded approach to professional development. Early Education & Development, 19, 396–429. doi:10.1080/10409280802065403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A. (2010). The importance of doing well in whatever you do: A commentary on the special section, “Implementation research in early childhood education.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 348–357. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. K. (2010). Exploring the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading achievement in grades K–1. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 162–174. doi:10.1080/19388070902913289
   Google Scholar
• Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. K. (2011). Examining the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading gains in grades K–3. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 83–106. doi:10.1086/660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI No. 231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Fuligni, A. S., Howes, C., Huang, Y., Hong, S. S., & Lara-Cinisomo, S. (2012). Activity settings and daily routines in preschool classrooms: Diverse experiences in early learning settings for low-income children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 198–209. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamse, B. C., Bloom, H. S., Kemple, J. J., & Jacob, R. T. (2008). Reading First impact study: Interim report (NCEE 2008-4016). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., … Laura, S. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE 2008-4030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, P. W., McLean, M. C., Waajid, B., & Pittman, E. R. (2015). Mentoring and professional development in rural Head Start classrooms. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23, 293–310. doi:10.1080/13611267.2015.1099868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerde, H. K., Bingham, G. E., & Pendergast, M. L. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Writing Resources and Interactions in Teaching Environments (WRITE) for preschool classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1094–1103. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. S., & Daniels, J. (2012). Coaching and professional development in early childhood classrooms: Current practices and recommendations for the future. NHSA Dialog, 15, 206–220. doi:10.1080/15240754.2012.665509
   Google Scholar
• Hemmeter, M. L., Snyder, P., Kinder, K., & Artman, K. (2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, A., Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2014). Building teachers’ data-use capacity: Insights from strong and developing coaches. Education Policy and Analyses Archives, 22, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 88–110. doi:10.1080/19345740802539325
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, B., Larzelere, R., Clair, L. S., Corr, M., Fichter, C., & Egertson, H. (2006). The impact of HeadsUp! Reading on early childhood educators’ literacy practices and preschool children’s literacy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 213–226. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. H., McCoy, A., Carol, P., Anna, W., John, B., Melissa, C., … Paul, S. 2011 (2007). National evaluation of Early Reading First: final report. NCEE 2007-4007. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Washington, DC: U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education (Vol. 41). New York: New York Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, S., & Neuman, S. B. (2009). The impact of professional development in family child care: A practice-based approach. Early Education & Development, 20, 537–562. doi:10.1080/10409280902908841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, S. H., Anthony, J. L., Swank, P. R., & Monseque-Bailey, P. (2009). Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 448–465. doi:10.1037/a0013842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118, 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizakowski, Theresa. (2005). Minnesota early literacy training project: Final report highlights. Early report, 31, 1, 1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Mangin, M. M., & Dunsmore, K. (2013). Conflicting storylines in teacher leadership: How one literacy coach struggled to position herself and her work. The New Educator, 9, 226–249. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2013.806762
   Google Scholar
• Mangin, M. M., & Dunsmore, K. (2014). How the framing of instructional coaching as a lever for systemic or individual reform influences the enactment of coaching. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51, 179–213. doi:10.1177/0013161X14522814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Resnick, L. B. (2010). Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 249–272. doi:10.3102/0162373710363743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12. doi:10.1002/ace.7401
   Google Scholar
• National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). NAEYC position statement: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/PSDAP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2011). Early childhood education professional development: Training and technical assistance glossary. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/our-work/public-policy-advocacy/glossarytraining_ta.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 532–566. doi:10.3102/0002831208328088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Kamil, M. L. (2010). Preparing teachers for the early childhood classroom: Proven models and key principles. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Wright, T. S. (2010). Promoting language and literacy development for early childhood educators: A mixed-methods study of coursework and coaching. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 63–86. doi:10.1086/653470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohio Department of Education. (2013). Professional development for teachers. Retrieved from http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Teaching/Educator-Equity/METworks-in-Ohio/Professional-Development-for-Teachers
   Google Scholar
• Onchwari, G., & Keengwe, J. (2008). The impact of a mentor-coaching model on teacher professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 19–24. doi:10.1007/s10643-007-0233-0
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., O’Connell, A., Mauck, S., Weber-Mayrer, M., Schachter, R. E., & Spear, C. F. (2017). State-sponsored language and literacy professional development: Impacts on early childhood educators knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 354–378. doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1270378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Mauck, S., Schachter, R. E., Spear, C. F., Farley, K. F., Weber-Mayrer, M., … O’Connell, A. (2017, Spring). Assessing preschool professionals’ learning experiences in Ohio: What have we learned? Retrieved from https://earlychildhood.ehe.osu.edu/files/2017/04/APPLE-Assessing-Preschool-Professionals-Learning-Experiences-in-Ohio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. R., & Diamond, K. E. (2011). Improving the outcomes of coaching-based PD interventions. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 295–307). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. R., & Diamond, K. E. (2013). Implementation fidelity of a coaching-based professional development program for improving Head Start teachers’ literacy and language instruction. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 102–128. doi:10.1177/1053815113516678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, D., & Shelden, M. (2005). Evidence-based definition of coaching practices. CASEinPoint, 1, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sailors, M., & Price, L. (2015). Support for the Improvement of Practices through Intensive Coaching (SIPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115–127. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, R. E. (2015). An analytic study of the professional development research in early childhood education. Early Education & Development, 26, 1057–1085. doi:10.1080/10409289.2015.1009335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, R. E. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about how children learn during language and literacy instruction. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49, 95–111. doi:10.1007/s13158-017-0179-3
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, R. E., Spear, C. F., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Logan, J. A. R. (2016). Early childhood educators’ knowledge, beliefs, experiences, and children’s language- and literacy-learning opportunities: What is the connection? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 281–294. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. E., Cortina, K. S., & Carlisle, J. F. (2012). Understanding coach-based professional development in Reading First: How do coaches spend their time and how do teachers perceive coaches’ work? Literacy Research and Instruction, 51, 68–85. doi:10.1080/19388071.2011.569845
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-earlylearningchallenge/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Vella, J. (2008). On teaching and learning: Putting the principles and practices of dialogue education into action. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon-Feagans, L., Kainz, K., Amendum, S., Ginsberg, M., Wood, T., & Bock, A. (2012). Targeted reading intervention: A coaching model to help classroom teachers with struggling readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 102–114. doi:10.1177/0731948711434048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. (2014). The impact of coaching for preK-5 teachers: A Florida Institute of Education brief on teaching practice. Jacksonville: University of North Florida, Florida Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wasik, B., & Hindman, A. (2011). Identifying critical components of an effective preschool language and literacy coaching intervention. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 322–336). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber-Mayrer, M. M., Piasta, S. B., Ottley, J. R., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. (in press). Early childhood literacy coaching: An examination of coaching intensity and changes in educators’ literacy knowledge and practice. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (REL 2007-033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
   Google Scholar