References
- Alexander, R. J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (5th ed.). Dialogos.
- Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning and Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20–23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918910.pdf
- Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
- Barron, B., Cayton-Hodges, G., Bofferding, L., Copple, C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Levine, M. (2011). Take a giant step: A blueprint for teaching children in a digital age. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
- Bers, M. U. (2010). Beyond computer literacy: Supporting youth's positive development through technology. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.371
- Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Oxford University Press.
- Bers, M. U. (2018). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. NY: Routledge.
- Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
- Berson, I. R., Murcia, K., Berson, M. J., Damjanovic, V., & McSporran, V. (2019). Tangible digital play in Australian and U.S. preschools. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2019.1580986
- Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W., Howe, C., Lister, R., Mason, R., Highfield, K., & Veal, J. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–71. https://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
- Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design [Paper presention]. Annual AERA, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Brosterman, N. (1997). Inventing kindergarten. H.N. Abrams.
- Burleson, W. S., Harlow, D. B., Nilsen, K. J., Perlin, K., Freed, N., Jensen, C. N., Lahey, B., Lu, P., & Muldner, K. (2018). Active learning environments with robotic tangibles: Children’s physical and virtual spatial programming experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2724031
- Çetin, M., & Demircan, H. O. (2018). Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844
- Christ, T., Wang, X. C., Chiu, M. M., & Cho, H. (2019). Kindergartener’s meaning making with multimodal app books: The relations amongst reader characteristics, app book characteristics, and comprehension outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47(2), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.01.003
- Clarke-Midura, J., Lee, V., Shumway, J., & Hamilton, M. (2019). The building blocks of coding: A comparison of early childhood coding toys. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(7–8), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0059
- Clements, D. H. (1999). Young children and technology. In G. D. Nelson (Ed.), Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education (pp. 92–105). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussion of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278475
- Collinson, V. (1996). Becoming an exemplary teacher: Integrating professional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal knowledge [Paper presention]. Annual Meeting of the Japan-United State Teacher Education Consortium, Naruto, Japan.
- Datteri, E., Zecca, L., Laudisa, F., & Castiglioni, M. (2013). Learning to explain: The role of educational robots in science education. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 29–38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1130929.pdf
- Deak, G. O., & Wiseheart, M. (2015). Cognitive flexibility in young children: General or task-specific capacity? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.003
- Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
- Fields, D. A., Lui, D., & Kafai, Y. B. (2017). Teaching computational thinking with electronic textiles: High school teachers’ contextualizing strategies in exploring computer science. In S. C. Kong, J. Sheldon, & K. Y. Li (Eds.), Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2017. The Education University of Hong Kong.
- Flannery, L. P., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Let’s dance the “Robot Hokey-Pokey!”: Children’s programming approaches and achievement throughout early cognitive development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782614
- Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). How gesture promotes learning throughout childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00088.x
- Gomes, T. C. S., Falcão, T. P., & Tedesco, P. C. A. R. (2018). Exploring an approach based on digital games for teaching programming concepts to young children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.005
- Greenfield, D. B., Alexander, A., & Frechette, E. (2017). Unleashing the power of science in early childhood: A foundation for high-quality interactions and learning. Zero to Three, 37(5), 13–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1143042
- Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802595441
- Harlow, D. B., & Leak, A. E. (2014). Mapping students’ ideas to understand learning in a collaborative programming environment. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963360
- Heikkila, M., & Mannila, L. (2018). Debugging in programming as a multimodal practice in early childhood education settings. Multimodal Technologies Interact, 2(3), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030042
- Highfield, K. (2000). Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 22–27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ891802.pdf
- Hindman, A. H., Connor, C. M., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Untangling the effects of shared book reading: Multiple factors and their associations with preschool literacy outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.01.005
- Horn, M. S., Crouser, R. J., & Bers, M. U. (2012). Tangible interaction and learning: A hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0404-2
- Jamil, F. M., Linder, S. M., & Stegelin, D. A. (2018). Early childhood teacher beliefs about STEM education after a professional development conference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 409–417.
- Jung, S. E., & Won, E. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
- Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put your robot in, out your robot out: Sequencing through programming robots in early childhood. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.4.f
- Kozulin, A. (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
- Krauss, J., & Prottsman, K. (2016). Computational thinking and coding for every student. Corwin.
- Kyriacou, C., & Issitt, J. (2008). What characterises effective teacher-initiated teacher-pupil dialogue to promote conceptual understanding in mathematics lessons in england in key stages 2 and 3: A systematic review. London: EPPI-Centre, University of London. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/York%20Maths%20Report.pdf?ver=2008-03-27-164124-033
- Lavigne, H. J., & Cuellar, L. (2019). AHA! Island Media and hands-On activity sets: A formative research report. Waltham, MA: Education Development Center. https://www.informalscience.org/aha-island-media-and-hands-activity-sets-formative-research-report.
- Litowitz, B. E. (1993). Deconstruction in the zone of proximal development. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 184–196). Oxford University Press.
- MacDonald, A., Davies, N., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2012). Early childhood mathematics education. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011 (pp. 169–192). Boston, MA: Sense.
- McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. University of Chicago Press.
- Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. NY: Routledge.
- Merritt, E. G., Chiu, J., Peters-Burton, E., & Bell, R. (2018). Teachers’ integration of scientific and engineering practices in primary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9604-0
- Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnik, L. (2007). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
- Mioduser, D., & Levy, S. T. (2010). Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten children’s construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors. International Journal of Computer for Mathematical Learning, 15(2), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9163-9
- Moll, L. C. (2013). L. S. Vygotsky and education. Routledge.
- Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520709336917
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (2020). NAEYC position statement on developmentally appropriate practice: 2020. Washington, DC: NAEYC. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/2nd_public_draft_dap.pdf
- National Research Council (NRC). (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. The National Academies Press.
- Newhouse, C. P., Cooper, M., & Cordery, Z. (2017). Programmable toys and free play in early childhood classrooms. Australian Educational Computing, 32(1). https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/3494/
- Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children,computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
- Patterson, E. W. (2018). Exploratory talk in the early years: Analyzing exploratory talk in collaborative group activities involving younger learners. Education 3-13, 46(3), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1243141
- Pentimonti, J. M., & Justice, L. M. (2010). Teachers’ use of scaffolding strategies during read alouds in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0348-6
- Pentimonti, J. M., Justice, L. M., Yeomans-Maldonado, G., McGinty, A. S., & O’Connell, A. (2017). Teachers’ use of high- and low-support scaffolding strategies to differentiate language instruction in high risk/economically disadvantaged settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815117700865
- Pugnali, A., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). The impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 171–193. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3768
- Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C., & Clarke, S. (2018). Accountable talk: Instructional dialogue that builds the mind. The International Academy of Education (IAE) and the International Bureau of Education (IBE) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
- Resnick, M., Myers, B., Nakakoji, K., Shneiderman, B., Pausch, R., Selker, T., & Eisenberg, M. (2005). Design principles for tools to support creative thinking. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation workshop on Creativity Support Tools. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/CST/Papers/designprinciples.pdf
- Resnick, M., Martin, F., Berg, R., Borovoy, R., Colella, V., & Kramer, K. (1998). Digital manipulatives. Proceedings of the CHI ‘98 conference, Los Angeles, CA.
- Rich, P. J., & Langton, M. B. (2016). Computational thinking: Toward a unifying definition. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, D. G. Sampson, & P.Isaias (Eds.), Competencies in teaching, learning and educational leadership in the digitalage (pp. 229–242). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/97833193029591
- Rodgers, E. M. (2005). Interactions that scaffold reading performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(4), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3604_4
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
- Rogoff, B. (1993). Children’s guided participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), The Jean Piaget symposium series. Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2004). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2
- Rojas-Drummond, S., Torreblanca, O., Pedraa, H., Velex, M., & Guzman, K. (2013). Dialogic scaffolding: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.12.003
- Rudd, L. C., Lambert, M., Satterwhite, M., & Zaier, A. (2008). Mathematical language in early childhood settings: What really counts? Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0246-3
- Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2017). Improving preschoolers’mathematics achievement with tablets: A randomized controlled trial. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0203-9
- Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
- Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publication Ltd.
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Ground theory procedures and techniques. SAGE Publications.
- Strawhacker, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). What they learn when they learn coding: Investigating cognitive domains and computer programming knowledge in young children. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9622-x
- Strawhacker, A., Lee, M., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Teaching tools, teachers’ rules: Exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJr. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9
- Strawhacker, A. L, & Bers, M. U. (2015). “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing children’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphical, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9287-7
- Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD.
- Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2012). Gender differences in kindergarteners’ robotics and programming achievement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9210-z
- Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Girls, boys, and bots: Gender differences in young children’s performance on robotics and programming tasks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 15, 145–165. https://doi.org/10.28945/3547
- Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Dancing robots: Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
- Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technology, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
- Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, E. D. (2004). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner. Corwin.
- Wang, X. C. (2019, October). Fostering young children’s computational thinking: A systematic review. Invited presentation at Early Childhood Educational Research Workshop, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China.
- Wang, X. C., & Ching, C. C. (2003). Social construction of computer experience in a first-grade classroom: Social processes and mediating artifacts. Early Education and Development, 14(3), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1403_4
- Wang, X. C., & Choi, Y. (2019, October). Teachers’ scaffolding of preschoolers’ computational thinking. Invited presentation at Improving Scientific Literacy Forum, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
- Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035004607
- Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
- Wing, J. M. (2011). Computational thinking—What and why? In: The Link Magazine. Pittsburg, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why
- Xia, L., & Zhong, B. (2018). A systematic review on teaching and learning robotics content knowledge in K-12. Computer & Education, 127, 28–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.007
- Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 5:1–5:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872