229
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Response to Call

Learning Satisfaction with Online Teaching Video Cases Among Pre-Service Preschool Teachers in China

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abdous, M. H., & Yen, C.-J. (2010). A predictive study of learner satisfaction and outcomes in face-to-face, satellite broadcast, and live video-streaming learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.005
  • Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 5(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120
  • Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6047
  • Aparicio, M., Costa, C. J., & Moises, R. (2021). Gamification and reputation: Key determinants of e-commerce usage and repurchase intention. Heliyon, 7(3), e06383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06383
  • Awang, Z. (2014). A handbook on SEM for academicians and practitioners: The step by step practical guides for the beginners. Bandar Baru Bangi, MPWS Rich Resources, 10(3), 32–45.
  • Battalio, J. (2007). Interaction online: A reevaluation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 339–352,407. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/interaction-online-reevaluation/docview/231069960/se-2
  • Bautista, A., Ho, A., Lee, K., & Sun, J. (2022). Classroom video as a learning tool for early childhood teachers: Reviewing the literature to inform research and practice [Videos de clase en la formación de docentes de infantil: Revisando la literatura para guiar la investigación y las prácticas]. Culture & Education, 34(3), 836–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2102728
  • Bautista, A., Wong, J., & Cabedo-Mas, A. (2019). Music teachers’ perspectives on live and video-mediated peer observation as forms of professional development. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(3), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083718819504
  • Berson, I. R., Luo, W., & Yang, W. (2022). Special Issue: narrowing the digital divide in early childhood: technological advances and curriculum reforms. Early Education & Development, 33(1), 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.1989740
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  • Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.525
  • Casillas Martín, S., Cabezas González, M., & García Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Digital competence of early childhood education teachers: Attitude, knowledge and use of ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1681393
  • Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
  • Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
  • Dai, H. M., Teo, T., Rappa, N. A., & Huang, F. (2020). Explaining Chinese university students’ continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Computers & Education, 150, 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103850
  • Daugherty, L., Dossani, R., Johnson, E.-E., & Oguz, M. (2014). Using early childhood education to bridge the digital divide. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/PE119
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11(2), 210–232.
  • Gao, L., Vongurai, R., Phothikitti, K., & Kitcharoen, S. (2022). Factors influencing university students’ attitude and behavioral intention towards online learning platform in Chengdu, China. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision Action Outcome, 9(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.2
  • Garvis, S., & Pendergast, D. (2015). Thinking differently about infants and toddlers: Exploring the reflections of future Australian early childhood teachers in Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.7
  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
  • Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
  • Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  • Hong, S., Thong, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1819–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009
  • Hui, W., Hu, P. H., Clark, T. H., Tam, K. Y., & Milton, J. (2008). Technology‐assisted learning: A longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00257.x
  • Islam, A. K. M. N. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context. Computers & Education, 69, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.037
  • Islam, A., Azad, N., Mäntymäki, M., & Islam, S. (2014). TAM and e-learning adoption: A philosophical scrutiny of TAM, its limitations, and prescriptions for e-learning adoption research. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society.
  • Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N., & Stacey, G. W. (2013). Creating an effective online instructor presence. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
  • Jaggars, S., & Xu, D. (2013). Predicting online student outcomes from a measure of course quality. Community College Research Center. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8N29TZH
  • Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
  • Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2005). Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: Understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega, 33(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.012
  • Kennedy, A., & Lees, A. (2016). Preparing undergraduate pre-service teachers through direct and video-based performance feedback and tiered supports in early head start. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0725-2
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  • Kock, N. (2021). Common structural variation reduction in PLS-SEM: Replacement analytic composites and the one fourth rule. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2(5), 1–6.
  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A., & Schroder, K. (2010). Interaction and other variables as predictors of student satisfaction in online learning environments. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  • Laparo, K. M., Maynard, C., Thomason, A., & Scott-Little, C. (2012). Developing teachers’ classroom interactions: A description of a video review process for early childhood education students. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2012.705809
  • Lee, J. (2012). Patterns of interaction and participation in a large online course: Strategies for fostering sustainable discussion. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 260–272. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/patterns-interaction-participation-large-online/docview/1287024886/se-2
  • Lee, M.-C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
  • Liao, C., Palvia, P., & Chen, J.-L. (2009). Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). International Journal of Information Management, 29(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004
  • Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
  • McLeod, R. H. (2020). Supporting preservice teachers to implement systematic instruction through video review, reflection, and performance feedback [Article]. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01001-y
  • Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Conferences and changes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526674
  • Nagy, J. T. (2018). Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Olson, J. K., Bruxvoort, C. N., & Vande Haar, A. J. (2016). The impact of video case content on preservice elementary teachers’ decision‐making and conceptions of effective science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1500–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21335
  • Ouyang, Y., Tang, C., Rong, W., Zhang, L., Yin, C., & Xiong, Z. (2017). Task-technology fit aware expectation-confirmation model towards understanding of MOOCs continued usage intention.
  • Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011
  • Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University students’ perception of video-based learning in times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164
  • Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Hamre, B. K., & Justice, L. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.02.001
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
  • Rao, N., Zhou, J., & Sun, J. (2017). Early childhood education in Chinese societies (Vol. 19). Springer Netherlands.
  • Robles, F. M. R. (2006). Learner characteristic, interaction and support service variables as predictors of satisfaction in web-based distance education. The University of New Mexico.
  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061
  • Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3
  • Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
  • Thong, J. Y., Hong, S.-J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001
  • Wang, T., Lin, C.-L., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084586
  • Weber, K. E., Gold, B., Prilop, C. N., & Kleinknecht, M. (2018). Promoting pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management during practical school training: Effects of a structured online-and video-based self-reflection and feedback intervention. Teaching & Teacher Education, 76, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.008
  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400104
  • Yang, W., Huang, R., Su, Y., Zhu, J., Hsieh, W. -Y., & Li, H. (2022). Coaching early childhood teachers: A systematic review of its effects on teacher instruction and child development. Review of Education, 10(1), e3343. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3343
  • Zhao, L., Liu, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). The differentiate effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students’ learning achievement in a flipped classroom: A case of a modern educational technology course. Sustainability, 13(5), 2888. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052888
  • Zhou, J. (2017). Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: An extended ECM perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2914

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.