“Having an Ovary This Big Is Not Normal”: Physicians’ Use of Normal to Assess Wellness and Sickness During Oncology Interviews

REFERENCES

• Antaki, C., Condor, S., & Levine, R. M. (1996). Social identities in talk: Speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ okay usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (2009). A natural history of family cancer: Interactional resources for managing illness. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (2013a). Patients’ efforts to justify wellness in a comprehensive cancer clinic. Health Communication, 28, 577–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (2013b). “Tiny tiny little nothings”: Minimization in the face of cancer. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (2013c). Handbook of patient–provider interactions: Raising and responding to concerns about life, illness, and disease. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (2013d). Offerings of reassurance and varieties of response from cancer patients. Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (2014). Managing hopeful moments: Initiating and responding to delicate concerns about illness and health. In H. E. Hamilton & W. S. Chou (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and health communication (pp. 459–476). New York, NY:Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bredmar, M., & Linell, P. (1999). Reconfirming normality: The constitution of reassurance in talks between midwives and expectant mothers. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (Eds.), Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings (pp. 237–271). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-C., Sung, F.-C., Chien, K.-L., Hsu, H.-C., Su, T.-C., & Lee, Y.-T. (2010). Red blood cell distribution width and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in a community cohort in Taiwan. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171, 214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloute, K., Mitchell, A., & Yates, P. (2008). Traumatic brain injury and the construction of identity: A discursive approach. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 651–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2013). The voice of the patient: Non-alignment between patients and physicians in the consultation. In W. Beach (Ed.), Handbook of patient–provider interactions: Raising and responding to concerns about life, illness, and disease (pp. 299–306). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (2006). Editors’ introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Conversation analysis (pp. 1–9). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new biomedical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, R. M. (1984). From sentence to sequence: Understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Processes, 7, 135–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, R. M. (2013). Clinical care and conversational contingencies: The role of patients’ self-diagnosis in medical encounters. In W. Beach (Ed.), Handbook of patient–provider interactions: Raising and responding to concerns about life, illness, and disease (pp. 283–298). New York, NY: Hampton Press. (Originally published in 2001, Text, 21, 83–112)
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Giri, V. N. (2006). Culture and communication style. Review of Communication, 24(6), 124–130.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, T. (2008). Why medicine should care less about ‘sick’ and more about ‘normal’. Wired Magazine, 16.05. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-05/st_essay/.
   Google Scholar
• Greatbatch, D., & Dingwall, R. (1998). Talk and identity in divorce mediation. In C. Anataki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp.121–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of prognosis in the general-practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 235–267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2009). Conversation analysis as social theory. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 300–320). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in interaction: Interactions, identities, and institutions. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. (2006). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication, 19, 89–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E. (1993). The structure of death announcements: Looking on the bright side of death. Text, 13, 189–212.
   Google Scholar
• Huler, S. (2008). A new normal: Changing care to meet the needs of an exploding patient population—Cancer survivors. Duke Medical Magazine, 8, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2011). Bone marrow transplant program. Retrieved from http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_cancer_center/centers/pediatric_oncology/programs/bone_marrow_transplant.html
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (2004). On predicting a diagnosis as an attribute of a person. Discourse Studies, 6, 53–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W., & Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis, doctor patient interaction, and medical communication. Medical Education, 39, 428–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, H., & Crouch, M. (2004). Discordant feelings in the lifeworld of cancer survivors. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness & Medicine, 8, 139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley, A., & Dunnett, A. (1998). How gun-owners accomplish being deadly average. In C. Anataki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 34–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nadesan, M. (1997). Constructing paper dolls: The discourse of personality testing in organizational practice. Communication Theory, 7, 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1978). Action theory and the human condition. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 301–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2002). Agency and authority: Extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 219–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore, D. (2003). Doing “okay”: On the multiple metrics of an assessment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Anataki, C. (1998). Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity?: The interactional management of ‘being intellectually disabled.’ Disability and Society, 13, 807–827.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D., Hoover, D. R., Venetis, M. K., Kearney, T. J., & Street, R. L. (2013). Consultations between patients with breast cancer and surgeons: A pathway from patient-centered communication to reduced hopelessness. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca-Cuberes, C. (2008). Membership categorization and professional insanity ascription. Discourse Studies, 10, 543–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2011). Rose’s strategy of preventive medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A. (2013). Physician gender and patient-centered communication. A critical review of empirical research. In W. Beach (Ed.), Handbook of patient–provider interactions: Raising and responding to concerns about life, illness, and disease (pp. 473–487). New York, NY: Hampton Press. (Originally published in 2004, American Journal of Public Health, 25, 497–519)
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Swaan, A. D. (1999). The management of normality: Critical essays in health and welfare. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Venetis, M. K., Robinson, J. D., & Kearney, T. (in press). Breast-cancer patients’ participation behavior and coping during presurgical consultations: A pilot study. Health Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, M. (1958). The concept of normal in medicine. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 79, 43–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widdicombe, S. (1998a). ‘But you don’t class yourself’: The interactional management of category membership and non-membership. In C. Anataki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 52–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Widdicombe, S. (1998b). Identity as an analysts’ and participants’ resource. In C. Anataki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 191–206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context, and interaction. In C. Anataki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 85–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar