Portrayal of Mental Illness on the TV Series Monk: Presumed Influence and Consequences of Exposure

REFERENCES

• Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P. W. (Ed.). (2005). On the stigma of mental illness: Practical strategies for research and change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P. W., & Kleinlein, P. (2005). The impact of mental illness stigma. In P. W. Corrigan (Ed.), On the stigma of mental illness: Practical strategies for research and social change (pp. 11–44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., & Barr, L. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 875–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couture, S., & Penn, D. (2003). Interpersonal contact and the stigma of mental illness: A review of the literature. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 291–305.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Nathanson, A. I., Detenber, B. H., & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research, 26, 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, D. G. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C., Herbst, S., O’Keefe, G., Shapiro, R., & Lindeman, M. (2004). Public opinion (2nd ed.) Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. & Vincze, L. (2012). Undermining stereotypes of linguistic groups through mediated intergroup contact. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C. (2008). Parasocial and online social relationships. In S. L. Calvert & B. J. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of children, media, and development (pp. 309–333). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C. A., & Cohen, E. L. (2012). Responses to obsessive compulsive disorder on Monk among series fans: Parasocial relations, presumed media influence, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 650–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C. A., & Cohen, E. L. (2013). Short-term and enduring consequences of fright. In E. Scharrer (Ed.), Media effects/media psychology (pp. 374–401). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A. (2008). Managing Mr. Monk: Control and the politics of madness. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 25, 28–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., Cantor, N., Albright, J. S., Chew, B. R., Klein, S. B., & Niedenthal, P. M. (1988). Information processing and the study of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (pp. 145–178). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klin, A., & Lemish, D. (2008). Mental disorders stigma in the media: Review of studies on production, content, and influences. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 434–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. K., Pescosolido, B. A., & Tuch, S. A. (2000). Of fear and loathing: The role of “disturbing behavior,” labels, and causal attributions in shaping public attitudes toward people with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 208–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastro, D., Behm-Morawitz, E., & Ortiz, M. (2007). The cultivation of social perceptions of Latinos: A mental models approach. Media Psychology, 9, 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2005). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32, 822–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, E. (2005). Voice Awards honor positive portrayals of mental disorders. Monitor on Psychology, 36(9), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Pirkis, J., Blood, R. W, Francis, C., & McCallum, K. (2006). On-screen portrayals of mental illness: Extent, nature, and impacts. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 523–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Huang, L.-N. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48(2), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield, J. K., Fiorenza, E., & Sofronoff, K. (2004). Adolescents’ willingness to seek psychological help: Promoting and preventing factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, P. A., Villegas, J., & Jennings, N. A. (2004). Images of mental illness in the media: Identifying gaps in the research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 543–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In R .L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y. (2007). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: The case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57, 632–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the ‘third person effect’: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van ‘t Veer, J. T. B., Kraan, H. F., Drosseart, S. H. C., & Modde, J. M. (2006). Determinants that shape public attitudes toward the mentally ill: A Dutch public study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 310–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl, O. F. (2003). Media madness: Public images of mental illness. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C. (2009). Cross-group contact effects. In S. Otten, T. Kessler, & K. Sassenberg (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of emotion and motivation (pp. 262–283). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar