762
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How patients understand physicians’ solicitations of additional concerns: implications for up-front agenda setting in primary care

&

References

  • Baker, L. H., O’Connell, D., & Platt, F. W. (2005). “What else?” Setting the agenda for the clinical interview. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143, 766–770.
  • Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325–352. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4
  • Beach, W. A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and ‘official’ priorities in medical interviews. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Cheneil (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 259–289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Beach, W. A., & Metzger, T. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23, 562–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x
  • Beckman, H. B., & Frankel, R. M. (1984). The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 101, 692–696.
  • Berger, Z., Saha, S., Korthuis, T., Roter, D., Sharp, V., Moore, R., & Beach, M. C. (2011). Agenda-setting in routine primary HIV care encounters. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, S242–S243.
  • Bergh, K. D. (1996). Time use and physicians’ exploration of the reason for the office visit. Family Medicine, 28, 264–270.
  • Bower, P., Macdonald, W., Harkness, E., Gask, L., Kendrick, T., Valderas, J. M., … Sibbald, B. (2011). Multimorbidity, service organization and clinical decision making in primary care: A qualitative study. Family Practice, 28, 579–587. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmr018
  • Braddock, C. H., Edwards, K. A., Hasenberg, N. M., Laidley, T. L., & Levinson, W. (1999). Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to basics. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 2313–2320.
  • Brock, D. M., Mauksch, L. B., Witteborn, S., Hummel, J., Nagasawa, P., & Robins, L. S. (2011). Effectiveness of intensive physician training in upfront agenda setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 1317–1323. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1773-y
  • Carroll, J. G., & Platt, F. W. (1998). Engagement: The grout of the clinical encounter. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, 5, 43–45.
  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Drew, P., Walker, T., & Ogden, R. (2012). Self-repair and action construction. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dugdale, D. C., Epstein, R., & Pantilat, S. Z. (1999). Time and the patient–physician relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, S34–S40. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00263.x
  • Dyche, L., & Swiderski, D. (2005). The effect of physician solicitation approaches on ability to identify patient concerns. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 267–270. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40266.x
  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. doi:10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
  • Enfield, N. J. (2013). Reference in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 433–454). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136. doi:10.1126/science.847460
  • Epstein, R. M., Mauksch, L., Carroll, J., & Jaen, C. R. (2008). Have you really addressed your patient’s concerns? Family Practice Management, 15, 35–40.
  • Ford, C. E., Fox, S. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford, S. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 14–38). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grant, L. E. (2011). The frequency and functions of just in British academic spoken English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 183–197. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.006
  • Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J. (2008). Conversation analysis as social theory. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 300–320). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication, 19, 89–102. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1
  • Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliot, M. N., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1429–1433. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
  • Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
  • Kemper, K. J., Foy, J. M., Wissow, L., & Shore, S. (2008). Enhancing communication skills for pediatric visits through on-line training using video demonstrations. BMC Medical Education, 8, 8.
  • Kendrick, K., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52, 255–289.
  • Krupat, E., Frankel, R., Stein, T., & Irish, J. (2006). The four habits coding scheme: Validation of an instrument to assess clinicians’ communication behavior. Patient Education and Counseling, 62, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.015
  • Lerner, G. H., Bolden, G. B., Hepburn, A., & Mandelbaum, J. (2012). Reference recalibration repairs: Adjusting the precision of formulations for the task at hand. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45, 191–212. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.674190
  • Lindemann, S., & Mauranen, A. (2001). “It’s just real messy”: The occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 459–475. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00026-6
  • Lipkin, M., Quill, T. E., & Napodano, R. J. (1984). The medical interview: A core curriculum for residencies in internal medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 100, 277–284.
  • Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42, 255–280. doi:10.1017/S0025100312000187
  • Marvel, M. K., Epstein, R. M., Flowers, K., & Beckman, H. B. (1999). Soliciting the patient’s agenda: Have we improved? Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 283–287.
  • Mauksch, L. B., Dugdale, D. C., Dodson, S., & Epstein, R. (2008). Relationship, communication, and efficiency in the medical encounter: Creating a clinical model from a literature review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 168, 1387–1395.
  • McClave, E. Z. (2000). Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 855–878. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00079-X
  • Middleton, J. F., Mckinley, R. K., & Gillies, C. L. (2006). Effect of patient completed agenda forms and doctors’ education about the agenda on the outcome of consultations: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 332, 1238–1242. doi:10.1136/bmj.38841.444861.7C
  • National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. (2010). 2010 Summary tables. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/namcs_summary/2010_namcs_web_tables.pdf
  • Peltenburg, M., Fischer, J. E., Bahrs, O., van Dulmen, S., & van den Brink-Muinen, A. (2004). The unexpected in primary care: A multicenter study on the emergence of unvoiced patient agenda. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 534–540. doi:10.1370/afm.241
  • Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967.
  • Roberts, F., & Francis, A. (2013). Identifying a temporal threshold of tolerance for silent gaps after requests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 471–477.
  • Robinson, J. D. (2003). An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication, 15, 27–59. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1501_2
  • Robinson, J. D. (2006). Soliciting patients’ presenting concerns. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 22–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robinson, J. D., & Heritage, J. (2005). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: The completion relevance of current symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 481–493. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.004
  • Robinson, J. D., & Heritage, J. (2014). Intervening with conversation analysis: The case of medicine. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 201–218. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925658
  • Robinson, J. D., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in primary-care consultations: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27, 253–298.
  • Rodriguez, H. P., Anastario, M. P., Frankel, R. M., Odigie, E. G., Rogers, W. H., von Glahn, T., & Safran, D. G. (2008). Can teaching agenda-setting skills to physicians improve clinical interaction quality? A controlled intervention. BMC Medical Education, 8, 3.
  • Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  • Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 261–286). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266–298). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. J. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89–135). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1997a). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545. doi:10.1080/01638539709545001
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1997b). Third turn repair. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Baugh (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov. Volume 2: Social interaction and discourse structures (pp. 31–40). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2001, June). Increments. Paper presented at the Summer Linguistic Institute sponsored by the Linguistic Society of America, Santa Barbara, CA.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap and turn-taking. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 287–321). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … Levinson, S. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106
  • Wennerstrom, A., & Siegel, A. F. (2003). Keeping the floor in multiparty conversations: Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes, 36, 77–107. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3602_1
  • Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D., & Whalen, M. (1988). When words fail: A single-case analysis. Social Problems, 35, 335–362. doi:10.2307/800591
  • Wissow, L., Gadomski, A., Roter, D., Larson, S., Lewis, B., & Brown, J. (2011). Aspects of mental health communication skills training that predict parent and child outcomes in pediatric primary care. Patient Education and Counseling, 82, 226–232. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.019

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.