Just What the Doctor Tweeted: Physicians’ Challenges and Rewards of Using Twitter

References

• American Medical Association. (2006). Improving communication—Improving care: An ethical force program consensus report. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., Tates, K., & Nieboer, T. E. (2013). Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: Motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Education and Counseling, 92, 426–431. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspden, P., & Katz, J. E. (2001). Assessments of quality of health care information and referrals to physicians. In R. E. Rice & J. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 107–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, E., Courtenay, M., Elder, A., Hull, S., & Julian, P. (1993). The doctor, the patient and the group: Balint revisited. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, R. S., Daughtridge, R., & Sloane, P. D. (2002). Physician–patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 15, 25–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biswas, M. (2013). Health organizations’ use of social media tools during a pandemic situation: An H1N1 flu context. Journal of New Communications Research, 5, 46–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011, August). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Paper presented at the 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 347–366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chretien, K. C., Azar, J., & Kind, T. (2011). Physicians on Twitter. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305, 566–568. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, A., Herselman, M. E., & Coleman, M. (2012). Improving computer-mediated synchronous communication of doctors in rural communities through cloud computing: A case study of rural hospitals in South Africa. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 4, 13–22. doi:10.5121/ijcsit.2012.4502
   Google Scholar
• Creation Pinpoint. (2014, March 26). New study reveals explosion of doctors on Twitter. Retrieved from http://www.creationpinpoint.com/new-study-reveals-explosion-doctors-Twitter/
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. D. (1985). Creative interviewing. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3, e20. doi:10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhi, P. (2009). The Twitter explosion. American Journalism Review, 31, 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzhugh, V. A. (2012). The potential impact of Twitter on the practice of medicine. International Journal of AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, 1, 78–79.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2011, February 1). Health topics. Pew Internet & American life project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Health_Topics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445. doi:10.2307/798843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory (Vol. 2). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greysen, S. R., Kind, T., & Chretien, K. C. (2010). Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 1227–1229. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1447-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawn, C. (2009). Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs, 28, 361–368. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Research Institute at PwC. (2012, April 17). Social media “likes” healthcare: From marketing to social business. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/us/healthsocialmedia
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, S. A., Howard, K. B., & Penney, B. K. (2008). Impact of Internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient–physician relationship: A survey-based study and review. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 108, 699–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreps, G. L., & Neuhauser, L. (2010). New directions in eHealth communication: Opportunities and challenges. Patient Education and Counseling, 78, 329–336. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labacher, L., & Mitchell, C. (2013). Talk or text to tell? How young adults in Canada and South Africa prefer to receive STI results, counseling, and treatment updates in a wireless world. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 1465–1476. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2010). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mackert, M., Champlin, S. E., Holton, A., Muñoz, I. I., & Damásio, M. J. (2014). eHealth and health literacy: A research methodology review. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19, 516–528. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G. (2014, January 8). The new exam room: Mapping patient–physician interactions online. Retrieved from http://blog.wcgworld.com/2014/01/the-new-exam-room-mapping-patient-physician-interactions-online
   Google Scholar
• Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1087–1110. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhauser, L., & Kreps, G. L. (2003). Rethinking communication in the e-health era. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 7–23. doi:10.1177/1359105303008001426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Rodgers, S., & Stemmle, J. (2013). Analyzing health organizations’ use of Twitter for promoting health literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 410–425. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.727956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: A review. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152, 1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Street, R. L., Gordon, H. S., Ward, M. M., Krupat, E., & Kravitz, R. L. (2005). Patient participation in medical consultations: Why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care, 43, 960–969. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suggs, L. S. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in new technologies for health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 61–74. doi:10.1080/10810730500461083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Friederichs-Fitzwater, M. M., & Gilgun, J. (2001). Relational control in physician-patient encounters. Health Communication, 13, 75–87. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1301_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E. (2014, July 28). Intro to communities of practice. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/theory/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2005). Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly, Ninth plenary meeting, Resolution. WHA58.28: eHealth. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
   Google Scholar