564
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Face Threats and Additional Reasons for Perceiving Support as Unwanted: A Study of Recently Diagnosed Cancer Patients

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Albrecht, T. L., Burleson, B. R., & Goldsmith, D. (1994). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 419–449). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115–1117. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
  • Baxter, L. A. (1986). Gender differences in the heterosexual relationship rules embedded in break-up accounts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 289–306. doi:10.1177/0265407586033003
  • Bergsma, J. (2002). Cancer and autonomy. Patient Education and Counseling, 47, 205–212. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00227-0
  • Braithwaite, D. O., Moore, J., & Abetz, J. S. (2014). “I need numbers before I will buy it”: Reading and writing qualitative scholarships on personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 490–496. doi:10.1177/0265407514524131
  • Brock, R. L., & Lawrence, E. (2009). Too much of a good thing: Underprovision versus overprovision of partner support. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 181–192. doi:10.1037/a0015402
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burleson, B. R. (2009). Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual process approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 21–38. doi:10.1177/0265407509105519
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Coyne, J. C., Wortman, C. B., & Lehman, D. R. (1988). The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Marshaling social support: Formats, processes, and effects (pp. 305–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174. doi:10.1177/009365092019002002
  • Ditzen, B., & Heinrichs, M. (2014). Psychobiology of social support: The social dimension of stress buffering. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 32, 149–162. doi:10.3233/RNN-139008
  • Floyd, K., & Ray, C. D. (in press). Thanks, but no thanks: Negotiating face threats when rejecting offers of social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Goldsmith, D. J. (1992). Managing conflicting goals in supportive interaction: An integrative theoretical framework. Communication Research, 19, 264–286. doi:10.1177/009365092019002007
  • Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47–58. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195001)6:1<47::AID-JCLP2270060111>3.0.CO;2-I
  • Kreps, G. L. (2006). Communication and racial inequities in health care. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 760–774. doi:10.1177/0002764205283800
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Lim, T.-S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415–450. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x
  • Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
  • Matsunaga, M. (2011). Underlying circuits of social support for bullied victims: An appraisal-based perspective on supportive communication and postbullying adjustment. Human Communication Research, 37(2), 174–206. doi:10.1111/hcre.2011.37.issue-2
  • McLaren, R. M., & High, A. C. (2015). The effect of under- and over-benefited support gaps on hurt feelings, esteem, and relationships. Communication Research, 42, 1–26. doi:10.1177/0093650215605155
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nausheen, B., Gidron, Y., Peveler, R., & Moss-Morris, R. (2009). Social support and cancer progression: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 67, 403–415. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.12.012
  • Rose, J. H. (1990). Social support and cancer: Adult patients’ desire for support from family, friends, and health professionals. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 439–464. doi:10.1007/BF00938117
  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. B. K. (1983). Face in interethnic communication. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 156–168). London, UK: Longman.
  • Tracy, S. J. (2012). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wilson, S. R., Kim, M.-S., & Meischke, H. (1991). Evaluating Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory: A revised analysis of directives and face. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 25, 215–252. doi:10.1080/08351819109389363
  • Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–566. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.