Differential Effects of Message Framing on Obesity Policy Support Between Democrats and Republicans

References

• Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., Brownell, K. D., & Schlesinger, M. (2009). Obesity metaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 7–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00546.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleich, S. N., & Blendon, R. J. (2010). Public opinion and obesity. In R. J. Blendon, D. E. Altman, M. Brodie, & J. M. Benson (Eds.), American public opinion and health care policy (pp. 346–366). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brescoll, V. L., Kersh, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2008). Assessing the feasibility and impact of federal childhood obesity policies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 615, 178–194. doi:10.1177/0002716207309189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, K. D., Kersh, R., Ludwig, D. S., Post, R. C., Puhl, R. M., Schwartz, M. B., & Willett, W. C. (2010). Personal responsibility and obesity: A constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Affairs, 29, 379–387. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 279–287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J. L., Jacobs, C., Pahlke, J., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015). Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 314–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Shen, L. J., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 Consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33, 467–488. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Anxiety, learning, and memory: A reconceptualization. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 363–385. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(79)90001-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. M., Updegraff, J. A., Rothman, A. J., & Sims, L. (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30, 145–152. doi:10.1037/a0022264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerend, M. A., & Shepherd, J. E. (2007). Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26, 745–752. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerend, M. A., Shepherd, J. E., & Monday, K. A. (2008). Behavioral frequency moderates the effects of message framing on HPV vaccine acceptability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 221–229. doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9024-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Lantz, P. M., & Ubel, P. A. (2009). The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2160–2167. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.161414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. B., & Harrington, N. G. (2011). Narrative and framing: A test of an integrated message strategy in the exercise context. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 264–281. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.529490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, S. J., & Hong, Y. (2016). Sensation seeking as a moderator of gain- and loss-framed HIV-test promotion message effects. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 46–55. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1033113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumanyika, S. K., Obarzanek, E., Stettler, N., Bell, R., Field, A. E., Fortmann, S. P., … Hong, Y. L. (2008). Population-based prevention of obesity: The need for comprehensive promotion of healthful eating, physical activity, and energy balance: A scientific statement from American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Committee for Prevention (formerly the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science). Circulation, 118, 428–464. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.189702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., Burgess, D., Snyder, M., Transue, J., Sullivan, J. L., Haney, B., & Wagner, S. H. (1999). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 337–347. doi:10.1177/0146167299025003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. K., Shapiro, M. A., & Niederdeppe, J. (2014). Deeper processing is associated with support for policies to reduce obesity. Health Communication, 29, 791–801. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.798060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, T., Sherman, D., & Updegraff, J. (2004). Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychology, 23, 330–334. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, L. A., & Ginis, K. A. M. (2004). The effects of message framing on exercise adherence and health beliefs among patients in a cardiac rehabilitation program. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 9, 122–135. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2004.tb00096.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500–510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M., Buzaglo, J. S., Simms, S. L., Green, V., Bales, C., Mangan, C. E., & Sedlacek, T. V. (1999). Monitoring styles in women at risk for cervical cancer: Implications for the framing of health-relevant messages. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 27–34. doi:10.1007/bf02895030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F., & Gerberding, J. L. (2004). Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1238–1245. doi:10.1001/jama.291.10.1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2012). Relative persuasiveness of gain- versus loss-framed human papillomavirus vaccination messages for the present- and future-minded. Human Communication Research, 38, 72–94. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., & Madden, K. (2014). The role of cultural worldviews and message framing in shaping public opinions toward the human papillomavirus vaccination mandate. Human Communication Research, 40, 30–53. doi:10.1111/hcre.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Madden, K., Richards, A., Holt, C., Wang, M. Q., & Tracy, K. (2016). Message framing, perceived susceptibility, and intentions to vaccinate children against HPV among African American parents. Health Communication, 31, 798–805. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1005280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Roh, S., & Shapiro, M. A. (2015). Acknowledging individual responsibility while emphasizing social determinants in narratives to promote obesity-reducing public policy: A randomized experiment. PLoS ONE, 10(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Roh, S., Shapiro, M. A., & Kim, H. K. (2013). Effects of messages emphasizing environmental determinants of obesity on intentions to engage in diet and exercise behaviors. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10, e0117565. doi:10.5888/pcd10.130163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., Kim, H. K., Bartolo, D., & Porticella, N. (2014). Narrative persuasion, causality, complex integration, and support for obesity policy. Health Communication, 29, 431–444. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.761805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions of responsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactive counterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research, 37, 295–323. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). Chapter 1: The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook, 30, 1–43. doi:10.1207/cy.2006.30.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644. doi:10.1080/10810730701615198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296–316. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Lee, T. (2005). Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 30, 923–954. doi:10.1215/03616878-30-5-923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Party identification. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/data-trend/political-attitudes/party-identification/
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Kam, J. A., Morgan, S. E., Liberona, C. A. M., & Smith, R. A. (2015). Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: An extension of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Communication, 65, 40–61. doi:10.1111/jcom.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202–S220. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, S. M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 420–428. doi:10.1037/h0033157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, S. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57. doi:10.1037/h0035588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, S. M., & Friend, K. E. (1973). Success and failure as determinants of level of authoritarianism. Behavioral Science, 18, 163–172. doi:10.1002/bs.3830180304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction?: Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470–487. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Debono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 586–597. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A., & DakeSource, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 119(4), 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Strasser, A., Cappella, J. N., Lerman, C., & Fishbein, M. (2009). A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity in health communication contexts. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 48–75. doi:10.1080/19312458.2010.547822
   Google Scholar