Interactional Alarms: Experts’ Framing of Health Risks in Live Broadcast News Interviews

References

• Abramson, K., Keefe, B., & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2015). Communicating about cancer through Facebook: A qualitative analysis of a breast cancer awareness page. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 237–243. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.927034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaek, E. (2011). The interaction between experts and journalists in news journalism. Journalism, 12, 335–348. doi:10.1177/1464884910392851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amberg, S. M., & Hall, T. E. (2010). Precision and rhetoric in media reporting about contamination in farmed salmon. Science Communication, 32, 489–513. doi:10.1177/1075547009357599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amend, E., & Secko, D. M. (2011). In the face of critique: A metasynthesis of the experiences of journalists covering health and science. Science Communication, 34, 241–282. doi:10.1177/1075547011409952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armon, R. (2016). Expert positions and scientific contexts: Storying research in the news media. Discourse & Communication, 10, 3–21. doi:10.1177/1750481315600303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armon, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2016). Our findings, my method: Framing science in televised interviews. Public Understanding of Science, Online first doi:10.1177/0963662516648532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armon, R., Barel Ben-David, Y., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). Ribosomes as current affairs: The science of London and Kirschenbaum (Hebrew). Media Frames, 16, 86–108. Retrieved from http://www.isracom.org.il/?cmd=media2.83
   Google Scholar
• Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2016). Obesity frames and counter-frames in British and German online newspapers. Health. Online first doi:10.1177/1363459316649764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. New York, NY: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, V. (2010). Media and risk: Old and new research directions. Journal of Risk Research, 13, 5–18. doi:10.1080/13669870903135953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B., & Robinson, J. D. (2011). Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication, 61, 94–119. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini, T., & Monclús, B. (2015). Radio audiences and participation in the age of network society. New York, NY and Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, T. (2007). Health, risk and news: The MMR vaccine and the media. London, UK: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Carneiro, I., & Howard, N. (2011). Introduction to epidemiology (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2016). The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political positioning and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80, 41–64. doi:10.1177/0190272516667705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, J., & Hughes, D. (2011). The silent killer in media stories: Representations of hypertension as health risk factor in French-language Canadian newspapers. Health, Risk & Society, 13, 577–592. doi:10.1080/13698575.2011.613455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 495–522. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4168872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2010). Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 133–156. doi:10.1080/08351811003751680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. B., Tanner, A., & Rose, I. D. (2014). Health journalists’ perceptions of their communities and implications for the delivery of health information in the news. Journal of Community Health, 39, 378–385. doi:10.1007/s10900-013-9774-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Mordini, E., James, J. J., Greco, D., & Green, M. S. (2014). Risk communication recommendations and implementation during emerging infectious diseases: A case study of the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 8, 158–169. doi:10.1017/dmp.2014.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. J. (1984). Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Greatbatch, D. (1986). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture & Society, 8, 441–455. doi:10.1177/0163443786008004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., Brandt, M., & Briggs, C. L. (2013). Biomedicalization and the public sphere: Newspaper coverage of health and medicine, 1960s–2000s. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 121–128. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, K., & Koteyko, N. (2013). Exploring health communication: Language in action. New York, NY and Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., Wilson, A., Meyer, S. B., Coveney, J., Calnan, M., McCullum, D., … Ward, P. R. (2014). The role of the media in construction and presentation of food risks. Health, Risk & Society, 16, 615–630. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.966806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2012). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, K., Blood, R. W., Imison, M., Chapman, S., & Fogarty, A. (2012). Risk, expert uncertainty, and Australian news media: Public and private faces of expert opinion during the 2009 swine flu pandemic. Journal of Risk Research, 15, 657–671. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.652651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, K., Blood, R. W., Thomas, S. I., Lewis, S., Komesaroff, P. A., & Castle, D. J. (2011). Our girth is plain to see’: An analysis of newspaper coverage of Australia’s future ‘fat bomb. Health, Risk & Society, 13, 31–46. doi:10.1080/13698575.2010.540648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, K., Sweet, M., Blood, R. W., & Fogarty, A. (2014). A legacy of the swine flu global pandemic: Journalists, expert sources, and conflicts of interest. Journalism, 15, 53–71. doi:10.1177/1464884913480460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2006). Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos, A., Cherubini, F., & Newman, N. (2016). The future of online news video. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Gearhart, S., & Bae, H.-S. (2010). Coverage of Alzheimer’s Disease from 1984 to 2008 in television news and information talk shows in the United States: An analysis of news framing. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 25, 687–697. doi:10.1177/1533317510387583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khayatzadeh-Mahani, A., Ruckert, A., & Labonté, R. (2017). Obesity prevention: Co-framing for intersectoral ‘buy-in’. Critical Public Health, Online first doi:10.1080/09581596.2017.1282604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariscy, R. W., Avery, E. J., & Sohn, Y. (2010). Health journalists and three levels of public information: Issue and agenda disparities? Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 113–135. doi:10.1080/10627260802640708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. G. (2004). Framing obesity: The evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 56–75. doi:10.1177/1081180x04266581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Ley, B. L., & Brewer, P. R. (2011). Breast cancer coverage in China and the United States: A comparative analysis of wire service news stories. Chinese Journal of Communication, 4, 182–197. doi:10.1080/17544750.2011.565676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschler, Y. (2009). Metalanguage in interaction: Hebrew discourse markers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, S. (2016). There are no old media. Journal of Communication, 66, 585–603. doi:10.1111/jcom.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariera, K. L., Hether, H. J., Murphy, S. T., De Castro Buffington, S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Portrayals of reproductive and sexual health on prime-time television. Health Communication, 29, 698–706. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.774653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrona, M. (2005). Speaking authoritatively: On the modality and factuality of expert talk in Greek television studio discussion programs. Text & Talk, 25, 233–267. doi:10.1515/text.2005.25.2.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. P. (2014). Scientists as public experts: Expectations and responsibility. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 70–82). New York, NY and Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., Wetherell, M., & Chitty, A. (1991). Quantification rhetoric: Cancer on television. Discourse & Society, 2, 333–365. doi:10.1177/0957926591002003005
   Google Scholar
• Raupp, J. (2014). Social agents and news media as risk amplifiers: A case study on the public debate about the E. coli outbreak in Germany 2011. Health, Risk & Society, 16, 565–579. doi:10.1080/13698575.2014.950203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesch, H., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2011). ‘Careless pork costs lives’: Risk stories from science to press release to media. Health, Risk & Society, 13, 47–64. doi:10.1080/13698575.2010.540645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., Hong Ha, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). The evidence of compelling arguments in agenda building: Relationships among public information subsidies, media coverage, and risk perceptions during a pandemic outbreak. Journal of Communication Management, 18, 101–116. doi:10.1108/JCOM-05-2012-0044
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H., & Veil, S. R. (2016). Health literacy and crisis: Public relations in the 2010 egg recall. Public Relations Review, 42, 214–218. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 193–227). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science Media Centre. (2013). Communicating risk in a soundbite: A guide for scientists. Retrieved from http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/obgyn.20150116/pdf/Communicating_Risk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2014). The conversation analytic role-play method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to simulated role-play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 255–265. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Bott, L., Adams, R., … Chambers, C. D. (2016). Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PLoS One, 11, e0168217. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C., & Rundblad, G. (2015). When safe means ‘dangerous’: A corpus investigation of risk communication in the media. Applied Linguistics, Online first doi:10.1093/applin/amv058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1987). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 205–216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. H., Friedman, D. B., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Influences on the construction of health news: The reporting practices of local television news health journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 359–376. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1029123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasterman, P. L., & Ruigrok, N. (2013). Pandemic alarm in the Dutch media: Media coverage of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic and the role of the expert sources. European Journal of Communication, 28, 436–453. doi:10.1177/0267323113486235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P. (2010). Sound-bite science: On the brevity of science and scientific experts in Western European television news. Science Communication, 32, 330–355. doi:10.1177/1075547010362709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal, 13, 51–62. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. (2008). Positioning in media dialogue: Negotiating roles in the news interview. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wellcome Trust. (2016). Tracking public views on science and biomedical research: Monitor report (Wave 3). London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wien, C. (2014). Commentators on daily news or communicators of scholarly achievements? The role of researchers in Danish news media. Journalism, 15, 427–445. doi:10.1177/1464884913490272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar