Can Liking, Commenting, and Sharing Enhance Persuasion? The Interaction Effect between Modality Interactivity and Agency Affordances on Smokers’ Quitting Intentions

References

• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805–814. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). How can we tell when a heuristic has been used? Design and analysis strategies for capturing the operation of heuristics. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 116–137. doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.903390
   Google Scholar
• Beuckels, E., & Hudders, L. (2016). An experimental study to investigate the impact of image interactivity on the perception of luxury in an online shopping context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of SocialPpsychology, 6, 33–68. doi:10.1080/14792779443000003
   Google Scholar
• Bos, M. J., Koolstra, C. M., & Willems, J. T. (2010). Early exposures to ecogenomics: Effects of priming and web site interactivity among adolescents. Science Communication, 32, 232–255. doi:10.1177/1075547009358625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, UK: Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Briñol, P. (2002). Mass Media Attitude Change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In J. Bryant, D. Zillman (Eds.), Media Effects (pp. 165–208). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., Burgoon, M., Hall, J. R., Levine, N., Taylor, A. M., Beach, B., … Melcher, C. (2000). Long-term effects of language intensity in preventive messages on planned family solar protection. Health Communication, 12, 261–275. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1203_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chen, S. (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553–578). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, N., Newen, A., & Vogeley, K. (2008). The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 523–534. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. doi:10.3727/109830512X13283928066995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J., & Kim, J. (2005). For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 669–694. doi:10.1002/mar.20079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58, 387–396. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00106-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.2307/1421838
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., Giese, J., & Dunwoody, S. (2002). Linking the heuristic-systematic model and depth of processing. Communication Research, 29, 705–732. doi:10.1177/009365002237833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., … Gouveia, F. (2015). The spatial presence experience scale (SPES). Journal of Media Psychology, 28, 1–15. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000137
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. doi:10.1111/jedm.12050
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–68. doi:10.2307/1251841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (2017). The meaning of interactivity—some proposals for definitions and measures. Human–Computer Interaction, 32, 103–138. doi:10.1080/07370024.2016.1226139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. W., Sinclair, R. C., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 179–196. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02078.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlor, L., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., & Giese, J. (2003). Studying heuristic‐systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23, 355–368. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior?. Journal of Communication, 56, 110–132. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., & Yang, S. U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43, 441–449. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Schmierbach, M. G., Chung, M. Y., Fraustino, J. D., Dardis, F., & Ahern, L. (2015). Is it a sense of autonomy, control, or attachment? Exploring the effects of in-game customization on game enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 695–705. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(JCMC325). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00073.x
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4, 355–383. doi:10.1177/146144480200400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, L. R. (2003). Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17. doi:10.1002/dir.10046
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., & Boyer, M. M. (2018). Learning from news on different media platforms: An eye-tracking experiment. Political Communication, 35, 75–96. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1388310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2016). Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators. New Media & Society, 18, 1579–1598. doi:10.1177/1461444814567982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50. doi:10.1093/ct/14.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of Advertising, 31, 43–57. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Edwards, S. M., & Lee, J. H. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising, 31, 37–47. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Ditton, T. B., Crane, D., Davis, B., Gil-Egui, G., Horvath, K., … Park, S. (2000, March). Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. In Third international workshop on presence, delft, the Netherlands (Vol. 240, pp. 2–4).
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Kim, Y., Dou, X. Y., & Kumar, S. (2014). Promote physical activity among college students: Using media richness and interactivity in web design. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31, 29–42. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Burgoon, M., Grandpre, J. R., & Alvaro, E. M. (2006). Identifying principal risk factors for the initiation of adolescent smoking behaviors: The significance of psychological reactance. Health Communication, 19, 241–252. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1903_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollen, A., & Wilson, H. (2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: Reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63, 919–925. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J. E., Cordes, J. W., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Nightly@ nbc. com: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 45, 164–175. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00748.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 325–340. doi:10.1177/1745691612447309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things.New York, (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., Robinson, H. R., & Lee, J. Y. (2013). Page flipping vs. clicking: The impact of naturally mapped interaction technique on user learning and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1334–1341. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, 65, 213–236. doi:10.1111/jcom.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Martínez-López, F. J. (2014). Another look at ‘being there’ experiences in digital media: Exploring connections of telepresence with mental imagery. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 508–518. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53, 504–516. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemer, C., Matthes, J., & Wirth, W. (2008). Toward improving the validity and reliability of media information processing measures in surveys. Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 193–225. doi:10.1080/19312450802310474
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10, 266–281. doi:10.1162/105474601300343603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, D. (2011). Anatomy of interaction experience: Distinguishing sensory, semantic, and behavioral dimensions of interactivity. New Media & Society, 13, 1320–1335. doi:10.1177/1461444811405806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, D., Ci, C., & Lee, B. K. (2007). The moderating effects of expectation on the patterns of the interactivity-attitude relationship. Journal of Advertising, 36, 109–119. doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367360308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H. S., Pusic, M., Nick, M. W., Sarpel, U., Plass, J. L., & Kalet, A. L. (2014). The cognitive impact of interactive design features for learning complex materials in medical education. Computers & Education, 71, 198–205. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., Fiore, A. M., & Park, J. (2007). Telepresence and fantasy in online apparel shopping experience. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 11, 553–570. doi:10.1108/13612020710824607
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, F. G., James, E. L., Chapman, K., & Lubans, D. R. (2016). Social cognitive theory mediators of physical activity in a lifestyle program for cancer survivors and carers: findings from the ENRICH randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 49. doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0372-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73–93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2007). Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 89–104). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0007
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008a). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008b). Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In E. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 50–60). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203926864
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118426456.ch3
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Kang, J., & Oprean, D. (2017). Being there in the midst of the story: How immersive journalism affects our perceptions and cognitions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20, 672–682. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortosa-Edo, V., López-Navarro, M. A., Llorens-Monzonís, J., & Rodríguez-Artola, R. M. (2014). The antecedent role of personal environmental values in the relationships among trust in companies, information processing and risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 17, 1019–1035. doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.841726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verčič, T., Verčič, D., & Laco, K. (2008). Comparing advertising and editorials: An experimental study in TV and print. Public Relations Review, 34, 380–386. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., & Sundar, S. S. (2018). How does Parallax Scrolling Influence User Experience? A Test of TIME (Theory of Interactive Media Effects). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34, 533–543. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1373457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, K., & Reeves, B. (2007). The effect of user control on the cognitive and emotional processing of pictures. Media Psychology, 9, 549–566. doi:10.1080/15213260701283186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, N. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: Effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 1–20. doi:10.1080/00909880802593928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Interactivity and memory: Information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 620–629. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., & Shen, F. (2018). Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 45, 635–658. doi:10.1177/0093650217700748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., & Shen, F. (2019). Involvement without knowledge gain: A meta-analysis of the cognitive effects of website interactivity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63, 211–230. doi:10.1080/08838151.2019.1622341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar