Norms Message Features in an Alcohol Consumption Context: Testing the Roles of Functional Matching and Numeracy

References

• Carpenter, C., Boster, F. J., & Andrews, K. R. (2013). Functional attitude theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 104–119). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2012). A meta-analysis of the functional matching effect based on functional attitude theory. Southern Communication Journal, 77(5), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2012.699989
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2005). Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scales. Communication Research, 32(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204273764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, A., & Rimal, R. N. (2016). Social norms: A review. Review of Communication Research, 4, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.12840/.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Miene, P. K., & Haugen, J. A. (1994). Matching messages to motives in persuasion: A functional approach to promoting volunteerism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(13), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. G. (2020). Verbal quantifiers and communicating painkiller side effect risk. Health Communication, 35(11), 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1632402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBono, K. G., & Snyder, M. (1989). Understanding consumer decision-making processes: The role of form and function in product evaluation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong, W., & Smith, S. W. (2013). Truth in advertising: Social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (4th ed., pp. 177–187). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Hunter, J. E. (1989). On the use and interpretation of the emotional empathy scale, the self-consciousness scale, and the self-monitoring scale. Communication Research, 16(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2003). The linear interaction model of personality effects in health communication. Health Communication, 15(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1501_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, A., Derry, H. A., & Smith, D. M. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS). Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x07304449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbeck, A. L., Ahlers-Schmidt, C. R., Paschal, A. M., & Dismuke, S. E. (2005). A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(4), 375–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (1987). Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(4), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hullett, C. R., & Boster, F. J. (2001). Matching messages to the values underlying value-expressive and social-adjustive attitudes: Reconciling an old theory with a contemporary measurement approach. Communication Monographs, 68(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Educational Services. (2003). National assessment of adult literacy (Report). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/266945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., Zhuang, J., Koh, H., & Shi, J. (2017). Descriptive norms and involvement in health and environmental behaviors. Communication Research, 44(3), 367–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215605153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (1996). Cognitive processing and the functional matching effect in persuasion: The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 580–604. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienemann, B. A., & Siegel, J. T. (2018). Increasing help-seeking outcomes among people with elevated depressive symptomatology with public service announcements: An examination of functional matching and message sidedness. Journal of Health Communication, 23(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0102100105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2013). The relative persuasiveness of different message types does not vary as a function of the persuasive outcome assessed: Evidence from 29 meta-analyses of 2,062 effect sizes for 13 message variations. Communication Yearbook, 37(1), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679151
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming . International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9–10), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088609077249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, N., Shulman, H. C., & McClaran, N. (2020). Changing norms: A meta-analytic integration of research on social norms appeals. Human Communication Research, 46(2–3), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, H. C., Rhodes, N., Davidson, E., Ralston, R., Borghetti, L., & Morr, L. (2017). The state of the field of social norms research. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1192–1213. https://doi.org/1932-8036/20170005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P., Kruglanski, A. W., & Spiegel, S. (2000). Attitudes as knowledge structures and persuasion as a specific case of subjective knowledge acquisition. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 59–96). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, S. E., Maio, G. R., Haddock, G., & Johnson, B. T. (2008). Attitude functions in persuasion: Matching, involvement, self-affirmation, and hierarchy. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 189–211). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Strasser, A., Cappella, J. N., Lerman, C., & Fishbein, M. (2011). A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2010.547822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar