Extending the Influence of Presumed Influence Hypothesis: Information Seeking and Prosocial Behaviors for HIV Prevention

References

• Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Martinson, F. E., Donaldson, K. H., Fullilove, R. E., & Aral, S. O. (2001). Social context of sexual relationships among rural African Americans. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 28(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007435-200102000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, J. D., Kinsky, S., Brown, G., & Charles, V. (2015). Knowledge, attitudes, and likelihood of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among US women at risk of acquiring HIV. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 29(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2014.0142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). HIV surveillance report, 2018 (Updated); vol. 31. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html
   Google Scholar
• Chia, S. C. (2006). How peers mediate media influence on adolescents’ sexual attitudes and sexual behavior. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, S. C., & Lee, W. (2008). Pluralistic ignorance about sex: The direct and the indirect effects of media consumption on college students’ misperception of sex-related peer norms. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Salmon, C. T. (2006). Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Shen, L., & Peng, L. (2020). Examining and extending the influence of presumed influence hypothesis in social media. Media Psychology, 24(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1729812
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an OSROR model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen, C. T., & Huberty, K. E. (2007). Media reach, media influence? The effects of local, national, and Internet news on public opinion inferences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwe, M. S. (2001). Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialidi, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. J. (2013). Disseminating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis information in underserved communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(1), S133–S136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., Nathanson, A. I., Detenber, B. H., & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person effect. Communication Research, 26(3), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, J. M., & Schuman, H. (1976). Public beliefs about the beliefs of the public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1086/268330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. C. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin, 2(1), 66–70. http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/V2/MB_V2_N3_Garland.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goparaju, L., Praschan, N. C., Warren-Jeanpiere, L., Experton, L. S., Young, M. A., & Kassaye, S. (2017). Stigma, partners, providers and costs: Potential barriers to PrEP uptake among US women. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 8(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000730
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Yang, Z. J. (2013). Linking risk messages to information seeking and processing. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 323–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679138
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1998). The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25(5), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Perloff, R. M., & Tsfati, Y. (2008). The third-person effect. In W. Donsbach & M. Traugott (Eds.), Handbook of public opinion research (pp. 181–191). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Bolt, D., Borzekowski, D. L., Liebhart, J. L., & Dillard, J. P. (2006). Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Christen, C. T., Liebhart, J. L., & Chia, S. C. Y. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/322846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Lee, E. W., Ng, K., Leong, G. S., & Tham, T. H. (2016). For fit’s sake: A norms-based approach to healthy behaviors through influence of presumed media influence. Health Communication, 31(9), 1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1038772
   Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Poorisat, T., Neo, R. L., & Detenber, B. H. (2014). Examining how presumed media influence affects social norms and adolescents’ attitudes and drinking behavior intentions in rural Thailand. Journal of Health Communication, 19(3), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.811329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Influence of presumed media influence for health prevention: How mass media indirectly promote health prevention behaviors through descriptive norms. Health Communication, 35(14), 1800–1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1663585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Myung, E. & Kim, S. (In press). The substituting relationship between presumed media influence and interpersonal health communication. Journal of Communication in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2021.1954411
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. A., Zhu, W., Smith, D. K., Harris, N., & Hoover, K. W. (2018). HIV preexposure prophylaxis, by race and ethnicity- United States, 2014-2016. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(41), 1147–1150. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6741a3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R. P., Mortensen, C. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., & Hurley, R. J. (2005). Third‐person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02670.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, R. (2005). One size doesn’t fit all: Selecting response scales for attitude items. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 15(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880500178849
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kredentser, M. S., Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., & Fulton, K. (2012). Following what people think we should do versus what people actually do: Elaboration as a moderator of the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611420481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A., Xu, X., & Dam, L. (2020). Information source dependence, presumed media influence, risk knowledge, and vaccination intention. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 29(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2020.1720022
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk, V., Herpen, E. V., Fischer, A. R., & van Trijp, H. (2011). To think or not to think: The effect of cognitive deliberation on the influence of injunctive versus descriptive social norms. Psychology & Marketing, 28(7), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, R. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third person effects and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/1.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Nan, X., & Zhao, X. (2015). The mediating role of perceived descriptive and injunctive norms in the effects of media messages on youth smoking. Journal of Health Communication, 21(1), 56–66. h ttps://d oi.o rg/d oi:1 0.1080/10810730.2015.1023958
   Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing. Communication Research, 29(3), 320–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, H. J. (1975). Pluralistic ignorance and white estimates of white support for racial segregation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1086/268231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, H. J., & Gunther, A. C. (2007). How peer proximity moderates indirect media influence on adolescent smoking. Communication Research, 34(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207302785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paek, H. J., Gunther, A. C., McLeod, D. M., & Hove, T. (2011). How adolescents’ perceived media influence on peers affects smoking decisions. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., & Smith, S. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A. S., Goparaju, L., Sales, J. M., Mehta, C. C., Blackstock, O. J., Seidman, D., Adimora, A. A., Fischl, M. A., Golub, E. T., Adimora, A. A., French, A. L., DeHovitz, J., Wingood, G., Kassaye, S., Sheth, A. N., & Ofotokun, I. (2019). PrEP eligibility among at-risk women in the southern United States: Associated factors, awareness, and acceptability. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 80(5), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_4
   Google Scholar
• Pressgrove, G., Barra, C., & Janoske, M. (2020). Using STOPS to predict prosocial behavioral intentions: Disentangling the effects of passive and active communicative action. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raifman, J. R., Schwartz, S. R., Sosnowy, C. D., Montgomery, M. C., Almonte, A., Bazzi, A. R., Drainoni, M.-L., Stein, M. D., Willie, T. C., Nunn, A. S., & Chan, P. A. (2019). Pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness and use among cisgender women at a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 80(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205275385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). “Corrective” actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharrer, E. (2002). Third-person perception and television violence: The role of out-group stereotyping in perceptions of susceptibility to effect. Communication Research, 29(6), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002237832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Huggins, C. (2013). Testing the model of influence of presumed influence in a boundary condition: The impact of question order. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 470–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, R. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Testing causal direction in the influence of presumed media influence. Communication Research, 37(6), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., & Tsfati, Y. (2020). Influence of presumed media influence. The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0129
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: The case of Gaza settlers. Communication Research, 32(6), 794–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205281057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willnat, L. (1996). Mass media and political outspokenness in Hong Kong: Linking the third-person effect and the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar