What Influences Audience Susceptibility to Fake Health News: An Experimental Study Using a Dual Model of Information Processing in Credibility Assessment

References

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, Z., Barua, S., Aktar, S., Kabir, N., & Li, M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
   Google Scholar
• Belluz, J. (2017, April 14). Doctors have decades of experience fighting “fake news.” Here’s how they win. Vox. https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/4/14/15262034/fight-fake-news-doctors-medical-community
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and healthcare reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P., & Xiao, X. (2018). The importance of ‘likes’: The interplay of message framing, source, and social endorsement on credibility perceptions of health information on Facebook. Journal of Health Communication, 23(4), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1455770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrau, D., & Ozturk, T. C. (2018). Motivating healthy eating: The role of presentation format and health consciousness. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnahan, D., Ulusoy, E., Barry, R., McGraw, J., Virtue, I., & Bergan, D. E. (2022). What should I believe? A conjoint analysis of the influence of message characteristics on belief in, perceived credibility of, and intent to share political posts. Journal of Communication, 72(5), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2016). Behavioral recommendations in health research news as cues to action: Self-relevancy and self-efficacy processes. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 954–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1204377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2015). Internet credibility and digital media literacy. In L. D. Rosen, N. A. Cheever & L. M. Carrier (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of psychology, technology, and society (pp. 56–73). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118771952
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope’s (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Duckworth, K., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, M., & Kucker, S. C. (2020). An M-Turk crisis? Shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., Blair, S., Busam, J. A., Forstner, S., Glance, J., Green, G., Kawata, A., Kovvuri, A., Martin, J., Morgan, E., Sandhu, M., Sang, R., Scholz-Bright, R., Welch, A. T., Wolff, A. G., Zhou, A., & Nyhan, B. (2020). Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conzola, V. C., & Wogalter, M. S. (2001). A communication–human information processing (C–hip) approach to warning effectiveness in the workplace. Journal of Risk Research, 4(4), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110062712
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, A. G., Villasis-Keever, M., & Jadad, A. R. (2002). Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA, 287(21), 2869–2871. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, K. M., Brown, A., & O’Connor, R. (2007). The cigarette controversy. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers, 16(6), 1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, G., Sutherland, G., & Keogh, L. (2022). Scientific research in news media: A case study of misrepresentation, sensationalism and harmful recommendations. Journal of Science Communication, 21(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21010206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Z. (2015). How to persuade adolescents to use nutrition labels: Effects of health consciousness, argument quality, and source credibility. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.989241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004a). The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004b). The readership of health magazines. Health Marketing Quarterly, 22(2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J026v22n02_03
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4), JCMC643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00126.x
   Google Scholar
• Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2020). The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-48
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G., & Jadad, A. R. (2001). Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney-Rutten, L. J., Blake, K. D., Greenberg-Worisek, A. J., Allen, S. V., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2019). Online health information seeking among US adults: Measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Reports, 134(6), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354919874074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Hocevar, K. P., & Samahito, S. N. (2014). Connecting with the user-generated web: How group identification impacts online information sharing and evaluation. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Winter, S., & Metzger, M. J. (2020). Making sense of credibility in complex information environments: The role of message sidedness, information source, and thinking styles in credibility evaluation online. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1547411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiling, I., Krause, N. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D. (2021). Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media: The role of anxiety during COVID-19. New Media & Society, 25(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211011451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaozhao, D. (2021). Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers’ identification of fake news. Governmental Information Quarterly, 38(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, S., & Ahn, J. (2011). Why are you sharing others’ tweets?: The impact of argument quality and source credibility on information sharing behavior. ICIS 2011 Proceedings. 4. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/humanbehavior/4
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, K. P., Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2014). Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. L., Felter, E. M., Chu, K.-H., Shensa, A., Hermann, C., Wolynn, T., Williams, D., & Primack, B. A. (2019). It’s not all about autism: The emerging landscape of anti-vaccination sentiment on Facebook. Vaccine, 37(16), 2216–2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, T., Ferrucci, P., & Vargo, C. J. (2020). Why do people share ideologically extreme, false, and misleading content on social media? A self-report and trace data-based analysis of counter-media content dissemination on Facebook and Twitter. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, B. D., & Adali, S. (2017). This just in: Fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 759–766. ArXiv:1703.09398 [cs.SI] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09398
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S. H. (2023). Misinformation exposure and acceptance: The role of information seeking and processing. Health Communication, 38(3), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1964187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). To tweet or to retweet? That is the question for health professionals on Twitter. Health Communication, 28(5), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.700391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292186002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T. C., Hwang, L. L., & Lai, Y. J. (2017). Effects of argument quality, source credibility and self-reported diabetes knowledge on message attitudes: An experiment using diabetes related messages. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 34(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Spence, P. R., & Lachlan, K. A. (2016). Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. E., & Cvetkovich, G. (1999). Social trust and the management of risk. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lwin, M. O., Panchapakesan, C., Sheldenkar, A., Calvert, G. A., Lim, L. K. S., & Lu, J. (2020). Determinants of e-health literacy among adults in China. Journal of Health Communication, 25(5), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1776422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(Part B), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. (2020, June 26). Facebook to label but leave up “newsworthy” posts that violate policies. The Hill. https://thehill.com/policy/technology/504750-facebook-to-label-newsworthy-posts-that-violate-policies
   Google Scholar
• Moravec, P. L., Kim, A., & Dennis, A. R. (2020). Appealing to sense and sensibility: System 1 and System 2 interventions for fake news on social media. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem, S. B., Bhatti, R., & Khan, A. (2020). An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., & Thompson, T. (2020). Introduction to the special forum on “Public health communication in an age of Covid-19”. Health Communication, 35(14), 1705–1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1840754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederdeppe, J., Fowler, E. F., Goldstein, K., & Pribble, J. (2010). Does local television news coverage cultivate fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention? Journal of Communication, 60(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01474.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, S., & Rapeli, L. (2019). Fighting misperceptions and doubting journalists’ objectivity: A review of fact-checking literature. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918786852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., Ahn, J., & Lim, H. S. (2019). Interactivity as a double-edged sword: Parsing out the effects of modality interactivity on anti-smoking message processing and persuasion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(4), 1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019835911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretti-Watel, P., Raude, J., Sagaon-Teyssier, L., Constant, A., Verger, P., & Beck, F. (2014). Attitudes toward vaccination and the H1N1 vaccine: Poor people’s unfounded fears or legitimate concerns of the elite? Social Science & Medicine, 109, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, S. (2020, May 11). Twitter to add labels and warning messages to disputed and misleading COVID-19 info. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/11/twitter-to-add-labels-and-warning-messages-to-disputed-and-misleading-covid-19-info/
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., & Mihalcea, R. (2017). Automatic detection of fake news . ArXiv:1708.07104 cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.07104
   Google Scholar
• Petit, J., Li, C., Millet, B., Ali, K., & Sun, R. (2021). Can we stop the spread of false information on vaccination? How online comments on vaccination news affect readers’ credibility assessments and sharing behaviors. Science Communication, 43(4), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211009887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (Eds.). (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central & peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampersad, G., & Althiyabi, T. (2020). Fake news: Acceptance by demographics and culture on social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1686676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y. (2013). Credibility and cognitive authority of information. In M. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed., pp. 1337–1344). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, R. M., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2021). Beyond “fake news”: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines. Judgment & Decision Making, 16(2), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500008640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. L. (2019). Disinformation and misinformation triangle: A conceptual model for “fake news” epidemic, causal factors and interventions. Journal of Documentation, 75(5), 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2018-0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloojee, Y., & Dagli, E. (2000). Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(7), 902–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharrer, L., Pape, V., & Stadtler, M. (2022). Watch out: Fake! How warning labels affect laypeople’s evaluation of simplified scientific misinformation. Discourse Processes, 59(8), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2096364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. (2020). When (fake) news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news (pp. 73–89). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, M. L., Barr, N., Peters, K., & Seli, P. (2021). Analytic-thinking predicts hoax beliefs and helping behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1813806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanone, M. A., Vollmer, M., & Covert, J. M. (2019). In news we trust?: Examining credibility and sharing behaviors of fake news. SMSociety ’19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 136–147). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328529.3328554
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A. A., Walentynowicz, M., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., & Wen, C. K. (2019). Mturk participants have substantially lower evaluative subjective well-being than other survey participants. Computers in Human Behavior, 94(C), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Syed Abdul, S., Fernandez-Luque, L., Jian, W.-S., Li, Y.-C., Crain, S., Hsu, M.-H., Wang, Y.-C., Khandregzen, D., Chuluunbaatar, E., Nguyen, P. A., & Liou, D.-M. (2013). Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: Anorexia on YouTube. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e30. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. S. L., Lee, C., & Chae, J. (2015). Exposure to health (mis)information: Lagged effects on young adults’ health behaviors and potential pathways. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Peterson, G. M., Walker, E., Christenson, J. K., Cowley, M., Kosari, S., Baby, K. E., & Naunton, M. (2018). Fake news: Medicines misinformation by the media. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 104(6), 1059–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, E. (2016). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017a). Leveraging institutions, educators, and networks to correct misinformation: A commentary on Lewandosky, Ecker, and Cook. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017b). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waggoner, P. D., Kennedy, R., & Clifford, S. (2019). Detecting fraud in online surveys by tracing, scoring, and visualizing IP addresses. Journal of Open-Source Software, 4(37), 1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01285
   Google Scholar
• Wardle, C. (2017, February 16). Fake news. It’s complicated. First Draft. https://medium.com/1st-draft/fake-news-its-complicated-d0f773766c79
   Google Scholar
• Waszak, P. M., Kasprzycka-Waszak, W., & Kubanek, A. (2018). The spread of medical fake news in social media – the pilot quantitative study. Health Policy and Technology, 7(2), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar