Engaging Audience on Social Media: The Persuasive Impact of Fit Between Humor and Regulatory Focus in Health Messages

References

• Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abo, M. M., Slater, M. D., & Jain, P. (2017). Using health conditions for laughs and health policy support: The case of food allergies. Health Communication, 32(7), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1172292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, J., Kim, J., & Sung, Y. (2021). AI-powered recommendations: The roles of perceived similarity and psychological distance on persuasion. International Journal of Advertising, 40(8), 1366–1384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1982529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhabash, S., & McAlister, A. R. (2015). Redefining virality in less broad strokes: Predicting viral behavioral intentions from motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1317–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814523726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 985–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). On the consumption of negative feelings. The Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/519498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63(4), 596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., Morris, J. S., & Coleman, J. M. (2018). Did the “road to the White House run through” Letterman? Chris Christie, Letterman, and other-disparaging versus self- deprecating humor. Journal of Political Marketing, 17(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2015.1074137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Haller, B. A. (2014). When political comedy turns personal: Humor types, audience evaluations, and attitudes. Howard Journal of Communications, 25(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2013.835607
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. A. (1976). Laughing matter: Anatomy of the joke. Journal of Communication, 26(3), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01913.x
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. A. (1993). An anatomy of humor (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315082394
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, N., & Brigaud, E. (2014). Humor in print health advertisements: Enhanced attention, privileged recognition, and persuasiveness of preventive messages. Health Communication, 29(7), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.769832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Becker, A. B., Anderson, A. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2020). Laughing with science: The influence of audience approval on engagement. Science Communication, 42(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020910749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo, S., Askelson, N. M., Spies, E. L., Boxer, C., Scharp, K. M., & Losch, M. E. (2013). “Wow, that was funny”: The value of exposure and humor in fostering campaign message sharing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 19(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413483456
   Google Scholar
• Cann, A., Cann, A. T., & Jordan, J. A. (2016). Understanding the effects of exposure to humor expressing affiliative and aggressive motivations. Motivation and Emotion, 40(2), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9524-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., Kim, H. S., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology, 18(3), 396–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.941112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. (2020, May 13). Stop the spread of germs. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/stop-the-spread-of-germs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.“. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(3), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388 eliminate extra period that now follows the end quote mark
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H., Yuan, S., & Liu, S. (2021). Call them COVIDiots: Exploring the effects of aggressive communication style and psychological distance in the communication of COVID-19. Public Understanding of Science, 30(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline, T. W., & Kellaris, J. J. (2007). The influence of humor strength and humor—message relatedness on ad memorability: A dual process model. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, K. H., Lampert, M. D., & Nelson, A. (1996). Sense of humor and styles of everyday humorous conduct. Humor, 9(3–4), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1996.9.3-4.273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(6), 781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, L. K., Mayer, S., Landwehr, J. R., Kirmani, A., & Peck, J. (2018). Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, G. D., Crawford, H. J., Lu, L., & Ngo, L. (2019). Does humour travel? Advertising practices and audience effects in the United States and People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Advertising, 38(7), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1590068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulas, C. S., Weinberger, M. G., & Swani, K. (2017). Humor and violence. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (pp. 1–12). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva035
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. The American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Park, E. (2020). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, R., & Yanovitzky, I. (2003). Using theory to design evaluations of communication campaigns: The case of the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Communication Theory, 13(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00289.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Boman, C. D., & Warner, B. R. (2021). Waiting for a match: Mitigating reactance in prosocial health behavior using psychological distance. Health Communication, 38(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1974662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles, I. A., & Nan, X. (2017). It’s no laughing matter: An exploratory study of the use of ironic versus sarcastic humor in health-related advertising messages. Health Marketing Quarterly, 34(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2017.1346432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janes, L. M., & Olson, J. M. (2010). Is it you or is it me? Contrasting effects of ridicule targeting other people versus the self. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v6i3.208
   Google Scholar
• Kant, L., & Norman, E. (2019). You must be joking! Benign violations, power asymmetry, and humor in a broader social context. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2019). Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages: The case of promoting HPV vaccination. Communication Research, 46(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W. (2018). They liked and shared: Effects of social media virality metrics on perceptions of message influence and behavioral intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in message framing in antismoking advertisements for adolescents. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, A. A., & Yuan, H. (2015). Effect of ad-irrelevant distance cues on persuasiveness of message framing. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.975877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labroo, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. The Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1086/593683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1086/605591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., Slater, M. D., & Tchernev, J. (2015). Self-deprecating humor versus other-deprecating humor in health messages. Journal of Health Communication, 20(10), 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. (2019). The role of construal level in message effects research: A review and future directions. Communication Theory, 29(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 353–381). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonnell, R., & White, K. (2015). How construals of money versus time impact consumer charitable giving. The Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372564-6.X5017-5
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor: Its origin and development. WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, A. P., Williams, L. E., & Warren, C. (2014). The rise and fall of humor: Psychological distance modulates humorous responses to tragedy. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5(5), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613515006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Mahood, C., & Brookes, S. (2011). Entertainment-Education in the context of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communication, 26(8), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.566832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Robinson, M. J., & Mcknight, J. (2018). The role of humor in messaging about the MMR vaccine. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1473533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2016). Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication, 31(7), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., & Dillman-Carpentier, F. (2008). Subjective knowledge and fear appeal effectiveness: Implications for message design. Health Communication, 23(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701808327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. Y., & Morton, C. R. (2015). The role of regulatory focus, social distance, and involvement in anti-high-risk drinking advertising: A construal-level theory perspective. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.1001503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00058-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharrer, E., Bergstrom, A., Paradise, A., & Ren, Q. (2006). Laughing to keep from crying: Humor and aggression in television commercial content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(4), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5004_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Glazer, E., & Smith, S. (2009). Effects of humor on presence and recall of persuasive messages. Communication Quarterly, 57(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370902881619
   Google Scholar
• So, J., Prestin, A., Lee, L., Wang, Y., Yen, J., & Chou, W. Y. S. (2016). What do people like to “share” about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter. Health Communication, 31(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.940675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, P. A. (2011). The influence of self-and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election. Social Science Information, 50(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018410396616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swani, K., Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (2013). The impact of violent humor on advertising success: A gender perspective. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.795121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., Smith, A. K., & Van Wagenen, S. B. (2012). Adoption and use of social media among public health departments. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, J. M., Collantes, L. M., Astrero, E. T., Millan, A. R., & Gabriel, C. M. (2020). Pandemic humor: Inventory of the humor scripts produced during the COVID-19 outbreak. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3.1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679473
   Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020, March 31). UN tackles “infodemic” of misinformation and cybercrime in COVID-19 crisis. https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• van der Wal, A., Piotrowski, J. T., Fikkers, K. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). More than just a laughing matter: A coding framework of humor in media entertainment for tweens and teens. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(3), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1796389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. A., Childs, K. E., Maschinski, C., Niño, N. P., & Ellsworth, R. (2010). Regulatory fit, processing fluency, and narrative persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19(3), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. P. (1979). Jokes: Form, content, use, and function. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. J. (2018). Using humour to increase effectiveness of shameful health issue advertising: Testing the effects of health worry level. International Journal of Advertising, 37(6), 914–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1340864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. J., & Tinkham, S. F. (2013). Humorous threat persuasion in advertising: The effects of humor, threat intensity, and issue involvement. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. (2015). Source similarity and social media health messages: Extending construal level theory to message sources. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(9), 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., Besley, J. C., & Lou, C. (2018). Does being a jerk work? Examining the effect of aggressive risk communication in the context of science blogs. Journal of Risk Research, 21(4), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1223159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1983). Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (pp. 85–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_5
   Google Scholar