Targeted Invitations to Tailor: Establishing Fertility as Relevant in U.S. Sex Education

References

• Akizuki, Y. (2021). Fertility knowledge and education. Impact, 7(7), 46–47. https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2021.7.46
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the ELM’s argument quality × processing type predictions. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy, K. R., Minich, M., Tao, R., Riddle, K., & Kim, S. (2022). To tailor or not to tailor: An investigation of narrative tailoring for health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 27(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2068702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (2006). Relationality. In G. J. Shepherd & J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as … perspectives on theory (pp. 3–12). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Coultas, C., Campbell, C., Mohamedi, R., & Sanga, U. (2020). Comprehensive sexuality education is “Not for us”: Rethinking “Cultural relevance” through Young Tanzanians’ identifications with/against intervention knowledge. Social Science & Medicine, 265, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniluk, J. C., & Koert, E. (2015). Fertility awareness online: The efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Human Reproduction, 30(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daumler, D., Chan, P., Lo, K. C., Takefman, J., & Zelkowitz, P. (2016). Men’s knowledge of their own fertility: A population-based survey examining the awareness of factors that are associated with male infertility. Human Reproduction, 31(12), 2781–2790. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2014). Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. American Journal of Public Health, 104(Suppl 1), S43–S48. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. M. (2009). Queer youth experiences with abstinence-only-until-marriage sexuality education: “Can’t get married so where does that leave me?” Journal of LGBT Youth, 6(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361650802396775
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What’s in it for me?” Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509378996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, D., Vassena, R., Prat, A., & Vernaeve, V. (2016). Increased fertility knowledge and awareness by tailored education: A randomized controlled trial. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 32(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Osterman, M. J. K. (2022, May). Births: Provisional data for 2021. NVSS: Vital statistics rapid release, 2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hans, S. L., & White, B. A. (2019). Teenage childbearing, reproductive justice, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 50(5), 690–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21803
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. L., Shields, A., & DeMaria, A. L. (2022). Relevant, relatable and reliable: Rural adolescents’ sex education preferences. Sex Education, 22(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1931086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., King, A. J., Carcioppolo, N., & Davis, L. (2012). Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01668.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E., Martins, N., & Parks, M. M. (2018). Public perception of female fertility: Initial fertility, peak fertility, and age-related infertility among U.S. adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1197-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. K., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2011). Exposure to and views of information about sexual abstinence among older teens. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 6(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2011.624480
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, C. E., & Lee, S. (2021). The impact of source and message relevance on audience responses to health podcasts. Communication Reports, 43(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129
   Google Scholar
• Kosenko, K. A. (2021). Foci and forms of problematic integration in the context of infertility. Communication Theory, 31(4), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M., & Wray, R. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(3), S227–S232. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.27.1.s3.6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreuter, M. K., & Skinner, C. S. (2001). Tailoring: What’s in a name? Health Education Research, 15(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/15.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudesia, R., Chernyak, E., & McAvey, B. (2017). Low fertility awareness in United States reproductive-aged women and medical trainees: Creation and validation of the Fertility & Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Fertility and Sterility, 108(4), 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lairson, D. R., DiCarlo, M., Myers, R. E., Wolf, T., Cocroft, J., Sifri, R., Rosenthal, M., Vernon, S. W., & Wender, R. (2008). Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer, 112(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2019). Qualitative communication research methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, F. K. (2012). Fertility, the reproductive lifespan and the formal curriculum in England: A case for reassessment. Sex Education, 12(5), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2011.627724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundsberg, L. S., Pal, L., Gariepy, A. M., Xu, X., Chu, M. C., & Illuzzi, J. L. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding conception and fertility: A population-based survey among reproductive-age United States women. Fertility and Sterility, 101(3), 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh, K. L. (2015). Teaching about the biological clock: Age-related fertility decline and sex education. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 22(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.5070/L3221026365
   Google Scholar
• Manne, S., Jacobsen, P. E., Ming, M. E., Winkel, G., Dessureault, S., & Lessin, S. R. (2010). Tailored versus generic interventions for skin cancer risk reduction for family members of melanoma patients. Health Psychology, 29(6), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., & Osterman, M. J. K. (2019, July). NCHS data brief, 346. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db346-h.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKee, A., Watson, A., & Dore, J. (2014). ‘It’s all scientific to me’: Focus group insights into why young people do not apply safe-sex knowledge. Sex Education, 14(6), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2014.917622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). What is relevant? Student perceptions of relevance strategies in college classrooms. Communication Studies, 60(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970902834866
   Google Scholar
• Nan, X., & Qin, Y. (2019). How thinking about the future affects our decisions in the present: Effects of time orientation and episodic future thinking on responses to health warning messages. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nargund, G. (2015). Why fertility education is needed in schools. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 7(3), 189–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2011). The elaboration likelihood model. In L. Van, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 224–245). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength (pp. 93–130). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ragnar, M. E., Grandahl, M., Stern, J., & Mattebo, M. (2018). Important but far away: Adolescents’ beliefs, awareness and experiences of fertility and preconception health. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 23(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1481942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnicow, K., Davis, R., Zhang, N., Strecher, V., Tolsma, D., Calvi, J., Alexander, G., Anderson, J. P., Wiese, C., & Cross, W. E. (2009). Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on ethnic identity: Results of a randomized study. Health Psychology, 28(4), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W. (2006). Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S184–S201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgh, G., Finer, L. B., Bankole, A., Eilers, M. A., & Singh, S. (2015). Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: Levels and recent trends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowards, S. (2010). Rhetorical agency as Haciendo Caras and differential consciousness through lens of gender, race, ethnicity, and class: An examination of Dolores Huerta’s rhetoric. Communication Theory, 20(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tng, H., & Au, A. K. C. (2014). Strategic display of anger and happiness in negotiation: The moderating role of perceived authenticity. Negotiation Journal, 30(3), 301–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Piehota, P., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2003). Matching health messages to information processing-styles: Need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Communication, 15(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1504_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., & Peterson, E. (2017). Effects of temporal framing on response to antismoking messages: The mediating role of perceived relevance. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1250844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar