Depolarized by the Media? The Role of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Traditional and Digital Media Diets in Issue Polarization Around COVID-19 in the United States

References

• Apuke, O. D., & Omar, B. (2021). Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, V., Abdul Rahman, L. H., Tan, J. K., & Lee, Y. S. (2023). COVID-19 fake news among the general population: Motives, sociodemographic, attitude/behavior and impacts – A systematic review. Online Information Review, 47(5), 944–973. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2022-0082
   Google Scholar
• Banisch, S., & Shamon, H. (2021). Biased processing and opinion polarisation: Experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3895117
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. (2010). What’s wrong with media monopolies? A lesson from history and a new approach to media ownership policy. MEDIA@LSE Electronic Working Papers, No 18. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaWorkingPapers/ewpNumber18.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Becher, M., Stegmueller, D., Brouard, S., & Kerrouche, E. (2021). Ideology and compliance with health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2106–2123. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogado, N., Bytzek, E., & Steffens, M. C. (2023). Framing the inclusiveness of the national ingroup: Do identity-related frames affect national identity representations salience? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 92, 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.101744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks: Political echo chambers. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, G. A., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization in response to learning about biological explanations of homosexuality. Sex Roles, 57(9), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9256-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(4), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruine de Bruin, W., Saw, H.-W., & Goldman, D. P. (2020). Political polarization in US residents’ COVID-19 risk perceptions, policy preferences, and protective behaviors. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 61(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-020-09336-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, E. J. R., Klas, A., & Dyos, E. (2021). The role of ideological attitudes in responses to COVID-19 threat and government restrictions in Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darius, P., & Stephany, F. (2022). How the far-right polarises twitter: ‘hashjacking’ as a disinformation strategy in times of COVID-19. In R. M. Benito, C. Cherifi, H. Cherifi, E. Moro, L. M. Rocha & M. Sales-Pardo (Eds.), Complex networks & their applications X (pp. 100–111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_9
   Google Scholar
• De Coninck, D., Duque, M., Schwartz, S. J., & d’Haenens, L. (2021). Public attitudes towards immigration, news and social media exposure, and political attitudes from a cross-cultural perspective: Data from seven European countries, the United States, and Colombia. Data in Brief, 39, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolman, A. J., Fraser, T., Panagopoulos, C., Aldrich, D. P., & Kim, D. (2022). Opposing views: Associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt. Journal of Public Health, 45(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewoldsen, D. R., Hoewe, J., & Grady, S. (2022). A cognitive processing framework for media interpretation. Journal of Media Psychology, 34(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitsilis, F. (2019). Imposing regulation on advanced algorithms. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27979-0
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowers, A., Mirza, A., & Emamdjomeh, A. (2020, November 13). The votes that won Joe Biden the presidency. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/elections/vote-margin-of-victory/
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro- and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization: Partisan media exposure and affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrau, V., Fujarski, S., Lorenz, H., Schieb, C., & Blöbaum, B. (2021). The impact of health information exposure and source credibility on COVID-19 vaccination intention in Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, B., & Johnston, C. D. (2022). Ideological asymmetries and the determinants of politically motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 66(2), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haileamlak, A. (2022). Pandemics will be more frequent. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 32(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v32i2.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J., Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19(4), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger, S., Hutter, S., & Kanol, E. (2023). The mobilisation potential of anti-containment protests in Germany. West European Politics, 46(4), 812–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2166728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J. (2013). Attitudinal impact and cognitive channelling of immigration stereotypes through the news. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, 599–621. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-992en
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., Moral-Toranzo, F., & Fernández, I. (2011). Cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional effects of news frame and group cues, on processing news about immigration. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M. (2014a). Challenges to selective exposure: Selective seeking and avoidance in a multitasking media environment. Mass Communication and Society, 17(5), 665–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.835425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M. (2014b). Seeking congruency or incongruency online?: Examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Science Communication, 36(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013502733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.2
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J., Panagopoulos, C., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2011). The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 971–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2017). Knowledge versus beliefs: How knowledge and beliefs mediate the influence of likeminded media use on political polarization and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(4), 658–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1375497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & De Zúñiga, H. G. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits: Social media and personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Johnson, B. K. (2014). Selective exposure for better or worse: Its mediating role for online news’ impact on political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecky, F. (2022). Arguments as drivers of issue polarisation in debates among artificial agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 25(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krafft, T. D., Zweig, K. A., & König, P. D. (2022). How to regulate algorithmic decision-making: A framework of regulatory requirements for different applications. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunst, M. (2021). Assessments of user comments with “alternative views” as a function of media trust. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(3), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2020). Effects of network heterogeneity on social media on opinion polarization among South Koreans: Focusing on fear and political orientation. International Communication Gazette, 82(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518820499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Kim, Y., & Kelsey, J. P. (2022). Beyond wishful thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic: How hope reduces the effects of death arousal on hostility toward outgroups among conservative and liberal media users for COVID-19 information. Health Communication, 37(14), 1832–1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1921906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiser, T. (2011). Experimental psychology: A place for innovative research and methodological developments. Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melki, J., Tamim, H., Hadid, D., Farhat, S., Makki, M., Ghandour, L., & Hitti, E. (2022). Media exposure and health behavior during pandemics: The mediating effect of perceived knowledge and fear on compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures. Health Communication, 37(5), 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1858564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazione, S., Perrault, E., & Pace, K. (2021). Impact of information exposure on perceived risk, efficacy, and preventative behaviors at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Communication, 36(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1847446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 205630511772931. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, T., Kelm, O., & Dohle, M. (2021). Polarisation and silencing others during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: An experimental study using algorithmically curated online environments. Javnost - the Public, 28(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1969621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2018). Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 27(8), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518801170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oishi, S., & Roth, D. P. (2009). The role of self-reports in culture and personality research: It is too early to give up on self-reports. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterholm, M. T. (2020). Preparing for the next pandemic. In W. C. Cockerham & G. B. Cockerham (Eds.), The COVID-19 reader (pp. 10–18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. F., & Stern, E. K. (2022). The Trump administration and the COVID-19 crisis: Exploring the warning-response problems and missed opportunities of a public health emergency. Public Administration, 100(3), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, C. T., & Poorisat, T. (2020). The rise and development of public health communication. Health Communication, 35(13), 1666–1677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1654180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindermann, C., Kannen, C., & Montag, C. (2021). The degree of heterogeneity of news consumption in Germany—Descriptive statistics and relations with individual differences in personality, ideological attitudes, and voting intentions. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211061729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2004). Democracy and filtering. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., & Riles, J. M. (2015). Polarization as a function of citizen predispositions and exposure to news on the internet. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1054996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. L., Van Dijcke, D., Painter, M., Sonin, K., & Milosh, M. (2020). Political polarisation impedes the public policy response to COVID-19. Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/political-polarisation-impedes-public-policy-response-covid-19
   Google Scholar