Testing Psychological Inoculation to Reduce Reactance to Vaccine-Related Communication

References

• Amazeen, M. A., Krishna, A., & Eschmann, R. (2022). Cutting the bunk: Comparing the solo and aggregate effects of prebunking and debunking COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Science Communication, 44(4), 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221111558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., Penkauskas, M. C., & Talbert, N. (2023). Inoculating against anti-vaccination conspiracies. Health Communication, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2235733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsch, C., & Böhm, R. (2016). Detrimental effects of introducing partial compulsory vaccination: Experimental evidence. The European Journal of Public Health, 26(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsch, C., Schmid, P., Heinemeier, D., Korn, L., Holtmann, C., Böhm, R., & Angelillo, I. F. (2018). Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. Public Library of Science One, 13(12), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208601
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, H., Dessart, F. J., Krawczyk, M., Lewandowsky, S., Pantazi, M., Pennycook, G., Schmid, P., & Smillie, L. (2023). The role of (trust in) the source of prebunks and debunks of misinformation. Evidence from online experiments in four EU countries. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vd5qt
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, R. B., Compton, J., Reynolds-Tylus, T., Neumann, D., & Park, J. (2023). Revisiting the effects of an inoculation treatment on psychological reactance: A conceptual replication and extension with self-report and psychophysiological measures. Human Communication Research, 49(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 220–236). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2021). Threat and/in inoculation theory. International Journal of Communication, 15, 4294–4306. http://ijoc.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drążkowski, D., & Trepanowski, R. (2022). Reactance and perceived disease severity as determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27(10), 2171–2178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.2014060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. R., Boland, W. A., Vallen, B., Connell, P. M., Sherman, G. D., & Feemster, K. A. (2020). Psychological reactance impacts ratings of pediatrician vaccine-related communication quality, perceived vaccine safety, and vaccination priority among U.S. parents. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 16(5), 1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1694815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-M., & Page, S. (1989). A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psychological Reports, 64(3_suppl), 1323–1326. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3c.1323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychology, 37(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 348–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: The epistemically-related emotion scales. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1268–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, T. (2019). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Communication, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2015). Inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30(5), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.867005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2018). The opposing mediational effects of apprehensive threat and motivational threat when inoculating against reactance to health promotion. Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1498909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., Banas, J. A., & Magid, Y. (2017). More on inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages: The paradox of threat. Health Communication, 32(7), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., & Larsen, M. (2021). Freedom-prompting reactance mitigation strategies function differently across levels of trait reactance. Communication Quarterly, 69(3), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.1920443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., Van Der Linden, S., & Nygren, T. (2020). Prebunking interventions based on “Inoculation” theory can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg, B. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2018). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soveri, A., Karlsson, L. C., Mäki, K. O., Holford, D., Fasce, A., Schmid, P., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Karlsson, H., Nolvi, S., Karukivi, M., Lindfelt, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2023). Trait reactance as psychological motivation to reject vaccination: Two longitudinal studies and one experimental study. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soveri, A., Karlsson, L. C., Mäki, O., Antfolk, J., Waris, O., Karlsson, H., Karlsson, L., Lindfelt, M., Lewandowsky, S., & Jonason, P. K. (2020). Trait reactance and trust in doctors as predictors of vaccination behavior, vaccine attitudes, and use of complementary and alternative medicine in parents of young children. Public Library of Science One, 15(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236527
   Google Scholar
• Sprengholz, P., & Betsch, C. (2020). Herd immunity communication counters detrimental effects of selective vaccination mandates: Experimental evidence. EClinicalMedicine, 22, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100352
   Google Scholar
• Sprengholz, P., Betsch, C., & Böhm, R. (2021). Reactance revisited: Consequences of mandatory and scarce vaccination in the case of COVID-19. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(4), 986–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprengholz, P., Felgendreff, L., Böhm, R., & Betsch, C. (2022). Vaccination policy reactance: Predictors, consequences, and countermeasures. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(6), 1394–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211044535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2024a). Educational structure of population. https://stat.fi/en/statistics/vkour
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2024b). Population and society. https://www.tilastokeskus.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(4), 205–2014. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waris, O., Karlsson, L., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Karlsson, H., & Soveri, A. (2021). The factorial structure of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale in two Finnish samples. Nordic Psychology, 73(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2020.1800508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2019). Ten Threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
   Google Scholar