The Role of Human Voice in Direct-To-Consumer Health Communication

References

• Abitbol, A., Lee, N., & VanDyke, M. (2022). Transparent DNA: Examining the impact of DTC genetic testing company communication on consumer trust, attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management, 26(3), 313–330 https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2022-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelos, R. H., Dantas, D. C., & Senecal, S. (2018). What your tone: How a brand’s tone of voice on social media influences consumer responses. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41(1), 60–80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, L., Holmes, B., & Kelly, C. (2005). National consumer health privacy survey 2005. California HealthCare Foundation: Forrester Research, Inc. http://www/sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505618303009.
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Castillo, C., & Anthony, D. L. (2014). The double-edged sword of electronic health records: Implications for patient disclosure. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(e1), e130–e140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. F., Yi, G. J., & Men, L. R. (2021). Effective social media communication for startups in China: Antecedents and outcomes of organization-public dialogic communication. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3613–3640 https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211051984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Chiou, E. K., & Schroeder, N. L. (2019). The impact of virtual human voice on learner trust. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63( 1), 2272–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, C., Nicol, D., Otlowski, M., & Chalmers, D. (2015). Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intention across commercial and conventional providers. Public Understanding of Science, 24(6), 731–750 https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513519937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkmans, C., Kerkholf, P., Buyukcan-Tetik, A., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2015). Online conversations and corporate reputation: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of exposure to the social media activities of a highly interactive company. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 20(6), 632–648 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. (2019, December). Direct-to-consumer tests. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics/direct-consumer-tests
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L. (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 6(1), 2–18 https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, J. F., & Longnecker, N. (2010). Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner Journal, 10(1), 38–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haga, S. B., Kim, E., Myers, R. A., & Ginsburg, G. S. (2019). Primary care physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and experience with personal genetic testing. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 9(2), 29–42 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm9020029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel, J. W., & Slobogin, C. (2018). Who knows what, and when? A survey of the privacy policies proffered by U.S. direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 28(1), 35–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendricks-Sturrp, R. M., Prince, A. E. R., & Lu, C. Y. (2019). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and potential loopholes in protecting consumer privacy and nondiscrimination. Journal of the American Medical Association, 321(19), 1869–1870 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, R., Crawford, G., Freeman, L., Fenwick, A., Wright, C. F., & Lucassen, A. (2019). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 367, 2–6 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javornik, A., Filieri, R., & Gumann, R. (2020). “Don’t forget that others are watching, too!” the effect of conversational human voice and reply length on observers’ perceptions of complaint handling in social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 50(1), 100–119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, E. S., & Sung, Y. (2011). Follow me! Global marketers’ Twitter use. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 4–16 https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2011.10722187.
   Google Scholar
• Laestadius, L. I., Rich, J. R., & Auer, P. L. (2017). All your data (effectively) belong to us: Data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms. Genetics in Medicine, 19(5), 513–520 https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., Kim, H. S., & Joo, M. H. (2023). Social media vs. mass media: Mitigating the suspicion of ulterior motives in public health communication. Health Communication, 38(11), 2450–2460 https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2074781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder, M. A., Guerrini, C. J., & McGuire, A. L. (2021). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Value and risk. Annual Review of Medicine, 72(1), 151–166 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-070119-114727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcon, A. R., Bieber, M., & Caulfield, T. (2018). Representing a “revolution”: How the popular press has portrayed personalized medicine. Genetics in Medicine, 20(9), 950–956 https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M., & Lerman, C. (2001). Genetic risk and behavioral change. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 322(7293), 1056–1059 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7293.1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. J. (1999). Health communication and the internet: Relations between interactive characteristics of the medium and site creators, content, and purpose. Health Communication, 11(4), 375–390 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1104_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., & Ki, E. J. (2019). Factors affecting social presence and world-of-mouth in corporate social responsibility communication: Tone of voice, message framing, and online medium type. Public Relations Review, 45(2), 319–331 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., & Cameron, G. T. (2014). Keeping it real: Exploring the roles of conversational human voice and source credibility in crisis communication via blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 487–507 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014538827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., & Lee, H. (2013). Show us you are real: The effect of human-versus-organizational presence on online relationship building through social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 265–271 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollach, I. (2005). Corporate self-presentation on the WWW: Strategies for enhancing usability, credibility and utility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(4), 285–301 https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510630098.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, D., Chan, A., Stacy, B., Javkar, K., Patkar, S., & Mazurek, M. L. (2020). User attitudes on direct-to-consumer genetic testing. IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, 120–138 https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP48549.2020.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2014). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-public relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784–1810 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraper, M., & Schicktanz, S. (2018). Medicine, market and communication: Ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), 56–67 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0292-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz, T. (2000). Mass media and the concept of interactivity: An exploratory study of online forums and reader email. Media, Culture & Society, 22(2), 205–221 https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022002005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoble, R., & Israel, S. (2006). Naked conversations: How blogs are changing the way businesses talk with customers. John Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, K. D., & Metzgar, E. (2007). Communicating during crisis: Use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 340–342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Noort, G., Verhoeven, J. W. M., & Kerkhof, P. (2015). Webcare as an integrative tool for customer care, reputation management, and online marketing: A literature review. In P. J. Kitchen & E. Uzunoglu (Eds.), Integrated communications in the postmodern era (pp. 77–99). Palgrave, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• VanDyke, M. S., Lee, N. M., Abitbol, A., Rush, S. W., & Mahmoud, A. B. (2023). How message appeals and prior product use influence information processing, risk perceptions, trust, attitudes, and genetic test purchase intentions. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0283102 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 443–479). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, K., Sanders, T. N., Hogan, N. S., Cherny, S., & Helzlsouer, K. J. (2013). Primary care patients’ views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: A longitudinal study. Journal of Community Genetics, 4(4), 495–505 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0156-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waters, E. A., Wheeler, C., & Hamilton, J. G. (2016). How are information seeking, scanning, and processing related to beliefs about the roles of genetics and behaviors in cancer causation? Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 6–15 https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1193917.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-U., Kang, M., & Johnson, P. (2010). Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication Research, 37(4), 473–479 https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoltick, E. S., Linderman, M. D., McGinniss, M. A., Ramos, E., Ball, M. P., Church, G. M., Leonard, D. G., Pereira, S., McGuire, A. L, Caskey, C. T., & Sanderson, S. C. (2019). Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: Design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq consortium. Genome Medicine, 11(10), 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0619-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar