38
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

COVID-19 Vaccine Boundary Work: The Case of Facebook Comments in Southeast Georgia

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alcendor, D. J. (2021). Targeting COVID vaccine hesitancy in rural communities in Tennessee: Implications for extending the COVID-19 pandemic in the South. Vaccines, 9(11), 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111279
  • Allen, D. (2013). “Just a typical teenager”: The social ecology of “normal adolescence” -insights from diabetes care. Symbolic Interaction, 36(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.42
  • Altheide, D. L. (1987). Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269
  • Altheide, D. L. (2000). Identity and the definition of the situation in a mass‐mediated context. Symbolic Interaction, 23(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1525/SI.2000.23.1.1
  • Altheide, D. L. (2020). Pandemic in the time of Trump: Digital media logic and deadly politics. Symbolic Interaction, 43(3), 514–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.501
  • Barker, K. K., Kenney, A. M., & Greene, R. N. (2021). Wrong versus right(eous): Online reader comments as scientific boundary‐work. Sociological Forum, 36(3), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12717
  • Bateman, L. B., Hall, A. G., Anderson, W. A., Cherrington, A. L., Helova, A., Judd, S., Kimberly, R., Oates, G. R., Osbourne, T., Ott, C., Ryan, M., Strong, C., & Fouad, M. N. (2021). Exploring COVID–19 vaccine hesitancy among stakeholders in African American and Latinx communities in the deep South through the lens of the health belief model. American Journal of Health Promotion, 36(2), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211045038
  • Bates, B. R., Villegas-Botero, A., Costales, J. A., Moncayo, A. L., Tami, A., Carvajal, A., & Grijalva, M. J. (2022). Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in three Latin American countries: Reasons given for not becoming vaccinated in Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. Health Communication, 37(12), 1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2035943
  • Best, J. (2020). Middle‐range future claims: Constructing the near‐future consequences of COVID‐19. Symbolic Interaction, 43(3), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/SYMB.499
  • Blume, S. (2017). Immunization: How vaccines became controversial. Reaktion Books.
  • Borah, P., & Hwang, J. (2022). Trust in doctors, positive attitudes, and vaccination behavior: The role of doctor–patient communication in H1N1 vaccination. Health Communication, 37(11), 1423–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1895426
  • Bradshaw, A. S. (2022). #DoctorsSpeakUp: Exploration of hashtag hijacking by anti-vaccine advocates and the influence of scientific counterpublics on Twitter. Health Communication, 38(10), 2167–2177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2058159
  • Bradshaw, A. S., Shelton, S. S., Wollney, E., Treise, D., & Auguste, K. (2021). Pro-vaxxers get out: Anti-vaccination advocates influence undecided first-time, pregnant, and new mothers on Facebook. Health Communication, 36(6), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712037
  • Brady, M. J., Christiansen, E., & Hiltz, E. (2023). Good Karen, bad Karen: Visual culture and the anti-vaxx mom on Reddit. Journal of Gender Studies, 32(6), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2069088
  • Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567
  • Cahill, S. E. (1999). The boundaries of professionalization: The case of North American funeral direction. Symbolic Interaction, 22(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1999.22.2.105
  • Campeau, K. (2023). Who’s a vaccine skeptic? Framing vaccine hesitancy in post-Covid news coverage. Written Communication, 40(3), 976–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883231169622
  • Chia, S. C., Lu, F., & Sun, Y. (2023). Tracking the influence of misinformation on elderly people’s perceptions and intention to accept COVID-19 vaccines. Health Communication, 38(5), 855–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1980251
  • Coleman, M. C. (2017). Rhetorical logic bombs and fragmented online publics of vaccine science. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 7(4), 203–216. http://contemporaryrhetoric.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Coleman7_4_1.pdf
  • Copes, H., Sandberg, S., & Ragland, J. (2023). Protecting stories: How symbolic boundaries reduce victimization and harmful drug use. Crime & Delinquency, 69(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221100131
  • DeDominicis, K., Buttenheim, A. M., Howa, A. C., Delamater, P. L., Salmon, D., Omer, S. B., & Klein, N. P. (2020). Shouting at each other into the void: A linguistic network analysis of vaccine hesitance and support in online discourse regarding California law SB277. Social Science and Medicine, 226, 113216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113216
  • Dixon, G. (2020). Undermining credibility: The limited influence of online comments to vaccine-related news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1865485
  • Dubé, È., Ward, J. K., Verger, P., & MacDonald, N. E. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and anti-vaccination: Trends and future prospects for public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102240
  • Fullenkamp, N. K. (2021). Playing Russian roulette with their kids: Experts’ construction of ignorance in the California and Ohio measles outbreaks. Social Science & Medicine, 272, 113704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113704
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Anchor.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
  • Harwood, J., & Sparks, L. (2003). Social identity and health: An intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Communication, 15(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3
  • Hedley, M. M., & Clark, S. A. (2007). The microlevel discourse of social movement framing: Debating antiwar protests on a university listserv. Sociological Focus, 40(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2007.10571297
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
  • Hwang, J., Cooley, A., Cooley, S., & Hinck, R. (2023). The effects of the culturally tailored narratives on COVID-19 vaccine confidence among Hispanics: A randomized online experiment. Journal of Health Communication, 28(3), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2191225
  • Kelly, B. J., & Hornik, R. C. (2016). Effects of framing health messages in terms of benefits to loved ones or others: An experimental study. Health Communication, 31(10), 1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1062976
  • Kelly, B. C., Trimarco, J., LeClair, A., Pawson, M., Parsons, J. T., & Golub, S. A. (2015). Symbolic boundaries, subcultural capital and prescription drug misuse across youth cultures. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12193
  • Kim, H., Han, J. Y., & Seo, Y. (2020). Effects of Facebook comments on attitude toward vaccines: The roles of perceived distributions of public opinion and perceived vaccine efficacy. Journal of Health Communication, 25(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1723039
  • Krishna, A. (2018). Poison or prevention? Understanding the linkages between vaccine-negative individuals’ knowledge deficiency, motivations, and active communication behaviors. Health Communication, 33(9), 1088–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331307
  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
  • Lee, T. K., & Su, L. Y. (2020). When a personal HPV story on a blog influences perceived social norms: The roles of personal experience, framing, perceived similarity, and social media metrics. Health Communication, 34(4), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1567440
  • L’Engle, K. L., Burns, J. R., Basuki, A., Couture, M., & Regan, A. K. (2023). Liberals are believers: Young people assign trust to social media for COVID-19 information. Health Communication, 39(2), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2164959
  • Liu, W., & Huang, Y. (2023). Does relationship matter during a health crisis: Examining the role of local government-public relationship in the public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. Health Communication, 38(6), 1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1993586
  • Lofland, J., Snow, D. A., Anderson, L. L., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.). Wadsworth.
  • Loseke, D. R. (2007). The study of identity as cultural, institutional, organizational, and personal narratives: Theoretical and empirical integrations. The Sociological Quarterly, 48(4), 661–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00096.x
  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1966). Identities and interactions. Free Press.
  • Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 904–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524
  • Nowak, G. J., & Cacciatore, M. A. (2023). State of vaccine hesitancy in the United States. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 70(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2022.11.001
  • Pitch-Loeb, R., Harriman, N. W., Healey, J., Bonetti, M., Toffolutti, V., Testa, M. A., Su, M., & Savoia, E. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine concerns about safety, effectiveness, and policies in the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Italy among unvaccinated individuals. Vaccines, 9(10), 1138. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101138
  • Pitts, M. J., Stanley, S. J., & Kim, S. (2016). College males’ enduring and novel health beliefs about the HPV vaccine. Health Communication, 32(8), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196421
  • Reich, J. A. (2016). Calling the shots: Why parents reject vaccines. University Press.
  • Scannell, D., Desens, L., Guadagno, M., Tra, Y., Acker, E., Sheridan, K., Rosno, M., Mathieu, J., & Fulk, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine discourse on Twitter: A content analysis of persuasion techniques, sentiment and mis/disinformation. Journal of Health Communication, 26(7), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1955050
  • Schmelz, K., & Bowles, S. (2022). Opposition to voluntary and mandated COVID-19 vaccination as a dynamic process: Evidence and policy implications of changing beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(13), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118721119
  • Schrodt, P., Zhuang, J., & Guan, M. (2023). A conditional process analysis of emerging adults’ motivated information management with parents, family conversation orientation, and intentions to vaccinate for COVID-19. Health Communication, 39(4), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2185348
  • Sharp, S. (2009). Escaping symbolic entrapment, maintaining social identities. Social Problems, 56(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.2.267
  • Silva, E. O. (in press). The continuing significance of vocabularies of motive for symbolic interactionist thought. In S. Chen (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction: Essential issues in symbolic interaction (Vol. 59). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Silva, E. O. (2013). Levels of disagreement over contested practices. Qualitative Sociology Review, 9(4), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.9.4.03
  • Silva, E. O., & Flynn, M. B. (2020). Liminal stigma and disaligning activity: Online comments about Trump’s family separation policy. Symbolic Interaction, 43(1), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.474
  • Snow, D. A. (2008). Elaborating the discursive contexts of framing: Discursive fields and spaces. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 30, pp. 3–28). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-2396(08)30001-5
  • Sobo, E. J. (2015). Social cultivation of vaccine refusal and delay among Waldorf (Steiner) school parents. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 29(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12214
  • Sorel, T., & Butler, J. (2022). The politics of covid vaccine hesitancy and opposition. The Political Quarterly, 93(2), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13134
  • Sprengholz, P., Eitze, S., Korn, L., Siegers, R., & Betsch, C. (2021). The power of choice: Experimental evidence that freedom to choose a vaccine against COVID-19 improves willingness to be vaccinated. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 87(May), 106–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.015
  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840
  • Tan, C. D. (2021). Defending ‘snake oil’: The preservation of contentious knowledge and practices. Social Studies of Science, 51(4), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312721992543
  • Toth, C. (2020). Repertoires of vaccine refusal in Romania. Vaccines, 8(4), 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040757
  • Turner, R. H. (1976). The real self: From institution to impulse. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 989–1016. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777553
  • Wanzer, M. B., Simon, K. G., & Cliff, N. J. (2022). Interpreting cancer survivors’ perceptions of the survivor label through social identity and communication accommodation theories. Health Communication, 37(13), 1600–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1909263
  • Ward, P. R., Attwell, K., Meyer, S. B., Rokkas, P., Leask, J., & Lee, A. (2017). Understanding the perceived logic of care by vaccine-hesitant and vaccine-refusing parents: A qualitative study in Australia. PLOS ONE, 12(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185955
  • Williams, J. P., & Copes, H. (2005). “How edge are you?” constructing authentic identities and subcultural boundaries in a straightedge internet forum. Symbolic Interaction, 28(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.1.67
  • Wu, Y., Kuru, O., Baruh, L., Çarkoglu, A., Cemalcilar, Z., & Yıldırım, K. (2024). Partisan bias in COVID-19 conspiracy theories: News reliance and the moderating role of trust in health authorities. Health Communication, 39(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2181678
  • Yan, K., Barbati, J. L., Duncan, K. L., Warner, E. L., & Rains, S. A. (2022). Russian troll vaccine misinformation dissemination on Twitter: The role of political partisanship. Health Communication, 38(8), 1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2021692
  • Zhou, S., Villalobos, J. P., Munoz, A., & Bull, S. (2022). Ethnic minorities’ perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines and challenges in the pandemic: A qualitative study to inform COVID-19 prevention interventions. Health Communication, 37(12), 1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2093557
  • Zhuang, J. (2022). Whose norms to follow? Effects of social norm specificity on Black Americans’ intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines. Health Communication, 38(11), 2350–2358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2069212
  • Zurcher, L. A. (1977). The mutable self: A self-concept for social change. Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.