Not Diane: The Risk of Error in Chaucerian Classicism

References

• Beadle, Richard. 1994. “English Autograph Writings of the Later Middle Ages: Some Preliminaries.” In Gli Autografi medievali: Problemi paleografici e filologici, edited by Paolo Chiesa and Lucia Pinelli, 249–268. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi Sull’Alto Medioevo.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, Henry, ed. 1906-35. Lydgate’s Troy Book, 4 vols., EETS ES 97, 103, 106, 126. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, Henry, ed. 1924-7. Lydgate’s Fall of Princes. 4 vols., EETS ES 121-124. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broyles, Paul. 2016. “Errare in romance.” Unpublished paper at the conference of the New Chaucer Society, London, July 13.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Christopher. 2016a. From Literacy to Literature: England, 1300–1400. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198779438.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, Christopher. 2016b. “‘Wyth her Owen Handys’: What Women’s Literacy Can Teach Us about Langland and Chaucer.” Essays in Criticism. 66 (3): 277–300.10.1093/escrit/cgw008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chance, Jane, ed. 1999. The Assembly of the Gods. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Marjorie Curry, and Rita Copeland. 1999. “Classroom and Confession.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, edited by David Wallace, 376–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521444200
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Robert R. 2016. “John Lydgate and the Remaking of Classical Epic.” In The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature: I, edited by Rita Copeland, 465–486. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587230.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Erdmann and Ekwall. 1911-30. Lydgate’s Siege of Thebes. 2 vols. EETS ES 108, 125. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Federico, Sylvia. 2016. The Classicist Writings of Thomas Walsingham: ‘Worldly Cares’ at St Albans Abbey in the Fourteenth Century. York: York Medieval Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Matthew. 2012. Scribal Authorship and the Writing of History in Medieval England. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, Andrew. 2008. “John Lydgate and the Origins of Vernacular Humanism.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 107 (4): 445–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Jane. 2014. Diverting Authorities: Experimental Glossing Practices in Manuscript and Print. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654512.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, Patricia Claire. 2015. The Medieval New: Ambivalence in an Age of Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812291230
   Google Scholar
• Jaszczolt, K. M. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics: Meaning in Language and Discourse. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, George. 1960. Piers Plowman: The A Version. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, Maidie Hilmo, and Linda Olson, eds. 2012. Opening Up Middle English Manuscripts: Literary and Visual Approaches. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, David. 1987. “Dullness and the Fifteenth Century.” English Literary History 54: 761–799.10.2307/2873098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, Geoffrey, ed. 1988. The Earliest English Translation of Vegetius’ De Re Militari. Middle English Texts, 21. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macaulay, G. C., ed. 1900-1. The English Works of John Gower. 2 vols. EETS es 81-2. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manly, John, and Edith Rickert, eds. 1940. The Text of the ‘Canterbury Tales’. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Neil. 2000. Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203464984
   Google Scholar
• Minnis, Alastair. 2016. “Other Worlds: Chaucer’s Classicism.” In The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature: I, edited by Rita Copeland, 413–434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587230.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, Maura. 2004. “‘Now Wo, Now Gladnesse’: Ovidianism in the Fall of Princes.” ELH 71: 531–558.10.1353/elh.2004.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme, Nicholas, ed. 2013. English School Exercises 1420–1530. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, Stephen. 2011. “Designing the Page.” In The Production of Books in England 1350–1500, edited by Alexandra Gillespie and Daniel Wakelin, 79–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, Eric. H. 1996. “The Reader as Author of the User-Produced Manuscript: Reading and Rewriting Popular Latin Theology in the Late Middle Ages.” Viator 27: 151–170.10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.301125
   Google Scholar
• Schick, J., ed. 1891. Lydgate’s Temple of Glass. EETS es 60. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213
   Google Scholar
• Spearing, A. C. 1985. Medieval to Renaissance in English Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Meaning and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, Robert ed. 1894. Lydgate and Burgh’s Secrees of Old Philisoffres. EETS es 66. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Susan. 2009. “Rhyme and Freedom.” In The Sound of Poetry, the Poetry of Sound, edited by Marjorie Perloff and Craig Dworkin, 29–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226657448.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Stompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakelin, Daniel. 2007. Humanism, Reading and English Literature 1430–1530. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215881.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wakelin, Daniel. 2010. “Instructing Readers in Fifteenth-Century Poetic Manuscripts.” Huntington Library Quarterly 73: 433–452.10.1525/hlq.2010.73.3.433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakelin, Daniel. 2014a. Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139923279
   Google Scholar
• Wakelin, Daniel. 2014b. “When Scribes Won’t Write: Gaps in Middle English Books.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 36: 249–278.10.1353/sac.2014.0008
   Google Scholar
• Windeatt, B. A. 1979. “The Scribes as Chaucer’s Early Critics.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 1: 119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Windeatt, B. A., ed. 1984. Geoffrey Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar