The rhetoric of dissent in Justice O'Connor's Akron opinion

References

• Sitomer , Curtis J. 1985 . “Right Turn Ahead for Supreme Court?,” . Christian Science Monitor , 16 July : 4
   Google Scholar
• Starr , Mark . 1985 . “Meese Weighs In on Abortion,” . Newsweek , 29 July : 60
   Google Scholar
• 1980 . “Excerpts From Platform to Be Submitted to Republican Delegates,” . New York Times , 13 July : A14
   Google Scholar
• Clines , Francis X. 1983 . “Reagan Urges Congress to Nullify Supreme Court's Abortion Rulings,” . New York Times , 17 June : A16
   Google Scholar
• Greenhouse , Linda . 1983 . “High Court Clears Up Any Doubts on Abortion,” . New York Times , 19 June : E7
   Google Scholar
• Bennett , W. Lance . 1979 . “Rhetorical Transformation of Evidence in Criminal Trials: Creating Grounds for Legal Judgment,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 65 : 311 – 323 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , Gerald R. , Fontes , Norman E. , Boster , Franklin J. and Sunnafrank , Michael J. 1983 . “Methodological Issues in Legal Communication Research: What Can Trial Simulations Tell Us?” . Communication Monographs , 50 : 33 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinard , John C. and Reynolds , Rodney A. 1978 . “The Effects of Inadmissable Testimony Objections and Rulings on Jury Decisions,” . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 15 : 91 – 109 .
   Google Scholar
• Dicks , Vivian . 1981 . “Courtroom Rhetorical Strategies: Forensic and Deliberative Perspectives,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 67 : 178 – 192 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson , Gayle Lewis . 1979 . “The Rhetoric of the Oral Argument in The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke,” . Western Speech Communication Journal , 43 : 271 – 277 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer , David . 1980 . “Analyzing Philosophy in Rhetoric: Darrow's Mechanism in the Defense of Leopold and Loeb,” . Southern Speech Communication Journal , 45 : 363 – 377 .
   Google Scholar
• Washby , Stephen L. , D'Amato , Anthony and Metrailer , Rosemary . 1976 . “The Functions of Oral Argument in the U. S. Supreme Court,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 62 : 410 – 422 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan , Michael R. 1976 . “Roe v. Wade: The Rhetoric of Fetal Life,” . Central States Speech Journal , 17 : 192 – 199 .
   Google Scholar
• Hunsaker , David M. 1978 . “The Rhetoric of Brown v. Board of Education: Paradigm for Contemproary Social Protest,” . Southern Speech Communication Journal , 43 : 91 – 109 .
   Google Scholar
• LaRue , L. H. 1981 . “The Rhetoric of Powell's Bakke” . Washington and Lee Law Review , 38 : 43 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• Prentice , Robert A. 1983 . “Supreme Court Rhetoric,” . Arizona Law Review , 25 : 85 – 122 .
   Google Scholar
• Vibbert , Candiss Baksa . November 1983 . “Context and Rhetorical Invention in Supreme Court Opinions,” . November , Washington, D. C. : SCA Convention .
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg , Richard . 1982 . “How Judges Speak: Some Lessons on Adjudication in Billy Budd, Sailor with an Application to Justice Rehnquist,” . New York University Law Review , 57 : 1 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth , Alan . 1974 . Prophets with Honor: Great Dissents and Great Dissenters in the Supreme Court , New York : Knopf .
   Google Scholar
• Campbell , J. Louis III . 1983 . “The Spirit of Dissent,” . Judicature , 66 : 305 – 312 .
   Google Scholar
• Jackson , Percival E. 1969 . Dissent in the Supreme Court; A Chronology , Norman : U of Oklahoma P .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , Stephen B. 1976 . “Justification in Judicial Opinions: A Case Study,” . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 12 : 121 – 129 .
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc , Don R. 1976 . “Free Speech Decisions and the Legal Process: The Judicial Opinion in Context,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 62 : 279 – 287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin , David A. 1978 . “Gottlieb's Model of Rule‐Guided Reasoning: An Analysis of Griswold v. Connecticut,” . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 15 : 77 – 90 .
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers , Raymond S. 1982 . “Generic Tendencies in Majority and Non‐Majority Supreme Court Opinions: The Case of Justice Douglas,” . Communication Quarterly , 30 : 232 – 236 .
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich , Walter . 1985 . “The Creation of a Legacy: Brandeis’ Concurring Opinion on Whitney v. California,” . Southern Speech Communication Journal , 50 : 143 – 155 .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , Warren E. 1964 . “Judicial Rhetoric: A Field for Research,” . Communication Monographs , 31 : 64 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield , Lawrence W. 1968 . “The Anatomy of Critical Discourse,” . Speech Monographs , 25 : 50 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Baum , Lawrence . 1981 . The Supreme Court , 118 – 120 . Washington, D. C. : Congressional Quarterly .
   Google Scholar
• 1979 . Congressional Quarterly Guide to the Supreme Court , 697 Washington, D. C. : Congressional Quarterly .
   Google Scholar
• Birkby , Robert H. 1983 . The Court and Public Policy , 455 Washington, D. C. : Congressional Quarterly .
   Google Scholar
• Hughes , Charles Evans . 1928 . The Supreme Court of the United States , 68 New York : Columbia UP .
   Google Scholar
• Perelman , Chaim . 1982 . The Realm of Rhetoric , 9 – 32 . Notre Dame : U of Notre Dame Press .
   Google Scholar
• Barbash , Fred and Kamen , Al . 1984 . “Supreme Court: ‘A Rotten Way to Earn a Living’,” . Washington Post Weekly , 1 October : 33
   Google Scholar
• 1983 . “… And Justice O'Connor,” . Washington Post , 17 June : A18
   Google Scholar
• Funston , Richard . 1978 . A Vital National Seminar: The Supreme Court in American Political Life , 217 214 Palo Alto : Mayfield .
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer , Lioyd . 1981 . “Political Rhetoric,” . In Handbook of Political Communication , Edited by: Nimmo , Dan D. and Sanders , Keith R. 246 Beverly Hills : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Makau , Josina M. 1984 . “The Supreme Court and Reasonableness,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 70 : 381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden , James L. and Makau , Josina M. 1982 . “Perspectives on Judicial Reasoning,” . In Explorations in Rhetoric: Studies in Honor of Douglas Ehninger , Edited by: McKerrow , Ray E. 162 Glenview : Scott Foresman .
   Google Scholar
• Emerson , Thomas I. 1982 . “The Power of Congress to Change Constitutional Decisions of the Supreme Court: The Human Life Bill,” . Northwestern University Law Review , 77 : 129 – 142 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1983 . U. S. Law Week , 15 June : 4767 – 4783 .
   Google Scholar
• Railsback , Celeste Condit . 1984 . “The Contemporary American Abortion Controversy: Stages in the Argument,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 70 : 410 – 424 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad , Charles . 1983 . “The Rhetoric of the Moral Majority: An Analysis of Romantic Form,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 69 : 159 – 170 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan , Michael R. 1976 . “Roe v. Wade: The Rhetoric of Fetal Life,” . Central States Speech Journal , 17 : 192 – 199 .
   Google Scholar
• Lake , Randall A. 1984 . “Order and Disorder in Anti‐Abortion Rhetoric: A Logological View,” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 70 : 425 – 443 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon , Martha . 1980 . “Redemptive Rhetoric: The Continuity Motif in the Rhetoric of Right to Life,” . Central States Speech Journal , 31 : 52 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• 1983 . “Supreme Court Decision on Abortion Laws: Statement by the President,” . Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents , 20 June : 885
   Google Scholar
• Reagan , Ronald . 1984 . Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation , Nashville : Thomas Nelson .
   Google Scholar
• 1981 . Hearings on the Nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor , 60 – 63 . Washington : GPO . 97th Cong., 1st sess.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick , James J. 1981 . “Why Justice O'Connor?,” . Nation's Business , October : 20
   Google Scholar
• Minnery , Tom . 1981 . “Profile Leaders Hurdle O'Connor Nomination,” . Christianity Today , 2 October : 55
   Google Scholar
• 1983 . “Going Against the Grain,” . Time , 27 June : 15
   Google Scholar
• Rees , Grover III . 1983 . “Questions for Supreme Court Nominees at Confirmation Hearings: Excluding the Constitution,” . Georgia Law Review , 17 : 913 – 967 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly , Jane . 1981 . “Here Comes La Judge,” . Time , 21 September : 12
   Google Scholar
• Press , Aric . 1981 . “O'Connor's Senate Trial,” . Newsweek , 21 September : 73
   Google Scholar
• 1981 . Executive Report on the Nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor , Washington : GPO . 97th Cong. 1st sess.
   Google Scholar
• 1983 . Time , 27 June : 15
   Google Scholar
• 1983 . The Washington Post , 17 June : A18
   Google Scholar
• Riggs , Robert E. 1983 . “Justice O'Connor: A First Term Appraisal,” . Brigham Young University Law Review , 1 : 1 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Kamen's , Al . 1986 . “Maybe Conservatives Shouldn't Take Sandra O'Connor for Granted” . Washington Post Weekly , 12 May : 31
   Google Scholar
• Powell , Justice . 1983 . Congressional Record , 28 June : S9277
   Google Scholar
• Buckley , Michael . 1982 . “Current Technology Affecting Supreme Court Abortion Jurisprudence,” . New York Law School Law Review , 27 : 1221 – 1260 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 1983 . New York Times , 17 June : 26
   Google Scholar
• 1985 . “Meese rips High Court on Miranda, Abortion,” . Tacoma News Tribune , 26 August : A3
   Google Scholar
• Richey , Warren . 1985 . “Reagan Switches Strategy on Abortion Challenge in Court,” . Christian Science Monitor , 17 July : 3
   Google Scholar
• 1985 . Newsweek , 29 July : 61
   Google Scholar
• Marcus , Ruth and Kamen , Al . 1985 . “The High Court Abortion Puzzle,” . Washington Post Weekly , 10 June : 24
   Google Scholar