Problems of validity in questionnaire studies of nonverbal behavior: Jourard's tactile body‐accessibility scale

References

• Andersen , P. A. , Andersen , J. F. and Mayton , S. M. 1985 . The development of nonverbal communication in the classroom: Teachers’ perceptions of students in grades K‐12 . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 49 : 188 – 203 .
   Google Scholar
• Andersen , P. A. , Andersen , J. F. and Lustig , M. W. 1987 . Opposite sex touch avoidance: A national replication and extension . Journal of Nonverbal Behavior , 11 : 89 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen , P. A. and Leibowitz , K. 1978 . The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance . Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior , 3 : 89 – 106 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen , P. A. and Sull , K. K. 1985 . Out of touch, out of reach: Tactile predispositions as predictors of interpersonal distance . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 49 : 57 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Barnlund , D. C. 1975 . “ Communicative styles in two cultures: Japan and the United States ” . In Organization of Behavior in Face‐to‐face Interaction , Edited by: Kendon , A. , Harris , R. M. and Key , M. R. 427 – 455 . The Hague : Mouton .
   Google Scholar
• Benoit , W. L. and Benoit , P. J. 1988 . Factors influencing the accuracy of verbal reports of conversational behavior . Central States Speech Journal , 39 : 218 – 232 .
   Google Scholar
• Bernard , H. R. , Killworth , P. , Kronenfeld , D. and Sailer , L. 1984 . The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data . Annual Review of Anthropology , 13 : 495 – 517 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryhill , N. B. 1982 . The influence of age, sex, family size, and community size on attitude toward tactile communication , Lubbock : Texas Tech Univeraity . Unpublished master's thesis
   Google Scholar
• Bruning , J. L. and Kintz , B. L. 1977 . Computational handbook of statistics , Glenview, Ill. : Scott, Foresman .
   Google Scholar
• Carmines , E. G. and Zeller , R. A. 1979 . Reliability and validity assessment , Beverly Hills : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. 1975 . Applied multiple recression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , Hillsdale, New Jersey : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon , J. K. , Buller , D. B. and Woodall , W. G. 1989 . Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue , New York : Harper & Row .
   Google Scholar
• Deethardt , J. F. and Hines , D. G. 1983 . Tactile communication and personality differences . Journal of Nonverbal Behavior , 8 : 143 – 156 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke , M. P. and Norwicki , S. 1972 . A new measure and social‐learning model for interpersonal distance . Journal of Experimental Research in Personality , 6 : 119 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga , R. H. 1976 . Nonverbal communication: Body accessibility among Japanese . Psycholgia , 18 : 205 – 211 .
   Google Scholar
• Heslin , R. and Alper , T. 1983 . “ Touch: A bonding gesture ” . In Nonverbal interaction , Edited by: Wiemann , J. M. and Harrison , R. P. 47 – 76 . Beverly Hills : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Hickson , M. L. and Stacks , D. W. 1985 . NVC nonverbal communication: Studies and applications , Dubuque, Iowa : William C. Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , S. E. 1986 . Sex differences in touch communication . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 50 : 227 – 241 .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , S. E. and Aiello , J. R. 1976 . A test of the validity of projective and quasi‐projective measures of interpersonal distance . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 43 : 143 – 152 .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , S. E. and Yarbrough , A. E. 1985 . A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch . Communication Monoraphs , 52 : 19 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourard , S. M. 1966 . An exploratory study of body‐accessibility . British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 5 : 221 – 231 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourard , S. M. and Rubin , J. E. 1968 . Self‐disclosure and touching: A study of two modes of interpersonal encounter and their inter‐relation . Journal of Humanistic Psychology , 8 : 39 – 48 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp , M. L. 1980 . Essentials of nonverbal communication , New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
   Google Scholar
• Lomranz , J. and Shapira , A. 1974 . Communicative patterns of self‐disclosure and touching behavior . The Journal of Psychology , 88 : 223 – 227 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosby , K. D. 1978 . A analysis of actual and ideal touching behavior as reported on a modified version of the body accessibility questionnaire , Richmond : Virginia Commonwealth University . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullian , M. 1982 . “ Measuring the ability to recognize facial expressions of emotion ” . In Emotion in the Human Face , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Ekman , Paul . 281 – 317 . Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld , L. B. , Kartus , S. and Ray , C. 1976 . Body accessibility revisited . Journal of Communication , 26 : 27 – 30 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz , W. C. 1958 . FIRO‐B: A three dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior , New York : Rinehart .
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson , G. A. The effects of touch on’ interpersonl perceptions . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association . Philadelphia, PA. May .
   Google Scholar
• Stembridge , D. A. 1973 . An exploratory study of tactual behavior , Houston : University of Houston . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Stier , D. S. and Hall , J. A. 1984 . Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 47 : 440 – 549 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer , R. 1965 . Further studies of small group ecology . Sociometry , 28 : 337 – 348 .
   Google Scholar