Member-Created Participatory Paradoxes in Church Decision Making

References

• Aggerholm, H. K., & Thomsen, C. (2012). The role of organization-wide meetings in the communicative practice of strategy: The creation of organizational unity and commitment, or tension and paradoxes? International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(2), 127–150. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2011.605779
   Google Scholar
• Armfield, G. G., Dixon, M. A., & Dougherty, D. S. (2006). Organizational power and religious individuals’ media use. Journal of Communication and Religion, 29, 421–444.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., & Trethewey, A. (2004). Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, L. R. (1993). Making the right decision: Organizational culture, vision, and planning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1988). Identity, structure and communicative action in church decision-making. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 345–362. doi: 10.2307/1387374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coopman, S. J., Hart, J., James G., Hougland, J., & Billings, D. B. (1998). Speaking for God: The functions of church leader storytelling in southern Appalachia in the 1950s. American Communication Journal, 1(2). Retrieved from http://ac-journal.org/journal/vol1/Iss2/curtain.html
   Google Scholar
• Coopman, S. J., & Meidlinger, K. B. (2000). Power, hierarchy, and change: The stories of a Catholic parish staff. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 567–625. doi: 10.1177/0893318900134002
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M. A. (2004). Silencing the lambs: The Catholic church’s response to the 2002 sexual abuse scandal. Journal of Communication and Religion, 27, 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S., & Goldstein-Hode, M. G. (2016). Binary logics and the discursive interpretation of organizational policy: Making meaning of sexual harassment policy. Human Relations, 69, 1729–1755. doi: 10.1177/0018726715624956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evered, R., & Louis, M. R. (1981). Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside.” Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 385–395. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1981.4285776
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, P., & Brecht, G. (1975). Vicious circles and infinity. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K., Hamel, S. A., & Richardson, B. K. (2001). Communicating change to nonprofit stakeholders: Models and predictors of implementers’ approaches. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 5–41. doi: 10.1177/0893318901151001
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, T., Dougherty, D. S., & Atkinson, J. (2006). “Paradoxing the dialectic”: The impact of patients’ sexual harassment in the discursive construction of nurses’ caregiving roles. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 416–450. doi: 10.1177/0893318905280879
   Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M., & Clinkscales, M. J. (2010). Nurses at the nexus: A case study in structurational divergence. Health Communication, 25, 32–49. doi: 10.1080/10410230903473516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M., & Mahon, M. M. (2013). Between rocks and hard places: Exploring the impact of structurational divergence in the nursing workplace. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 90–120. doi: 10.1177/089331893318912458214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349–407. doi: 10.1177/0893318901143001
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 119–146. doi: 10.1080/0090988042000210025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trethewey, A. (1999). Isn’t it ironic: Using irony to explore the contradictions of organizational life. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 140–167. doi: 10.1080/10570319909374634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar