Perceived Miscommunication in Friends’ and Romantic Partners’ Texted Conversations

References

• Anderson, M. (Aug. 17, 2015). For teens, phone calls are reserved for closer relationships. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/17/for-teens-phone-calls-are-reserved-for-closer-relationships/
   Google Scholar
• Aune, R. K., Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., Asada, K. J., & Banas, J. A. (2005). Tests of a theory of communicative responsibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(4), 358–381. doi:10.1177/0261927X05281425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 177–193). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S., & Ling, R. (2011). Necessary smileys & useless periods. Visible Language, 45(1/2), 45–67. Retrieved from http://visiblelanguagejournal.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1991). Hot air: Media, miscommunication, and the climate change issue. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 259–282). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N., Wiemann, J. M., & Giles, H. (1991). Talk about “problem” and communication as “miscommunication:” An integrative analysis. In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), “Miscommunication” and problematic talk (pp. 1–17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dua, H. R. (1990). The phenomenology of miscommunication. In S. H. Riggins (Ed.), Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution, and social interaction (pp. 113–139). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Dun, T. (2005, May). Troublesome differences: A typology of lay views of misunderstanding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, R. L., Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2015). The role of mobile phones in romantic relationships. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behavior (pp. 322–337). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Bybee, B. T., Frost, J. K., Harvey, A. J., & Navarro, M. (2017). That’s not what I meant: How misunderstanding is related to channel and perspective-taking. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36, 188–210. doi:10.1177/0261927X16662968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, I. (2010). The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• House, J., Kasper, G., & Ross, S. (2003). Misunderstanding talk. In J. House, G. Kasper, & S. Ross (Eds.), Misunderstanding in social life: Discourse approaches to problematic talk (pp. 1–21). London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., Bostwick, E., & Anderson, C. (2016). How do computer-mediated channels negatively impact existing interpersonal relationships? In E. S. Gilchrist-Petty & S. D. Long (Eds.), Contexts of the dark side of communication (pp. 241–252). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., Becker, B., Cole, J., Littleford, L., & Rothe, B. (2012). “It’s the American lifestyle!”: An investigation of text messaging by college students. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 13(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/17459435.2012.719203
   Google Scholar
• Keysar, B. (2007). Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(1), 71–84. doi:10.1515/IP.2007.004
   Google Scholar
• Lasén, A. (2011). Mobiles are not that personal: The unexpected consequences of the accountability, accessibility, and transparency afforded by mobile telephony. In R. Ling & S. W. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart (pp. 83–106). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, L., Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2009). The linguistic status of text message abbreviations: An exploration using a Stroop task. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 970–974. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2015). The presence of cell phones in romantic partner Face-to-Face interactions: An expectancy violation theory approach. Southern Communication Journal, 80, 253–270. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2015.1055371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 17–34. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.642263
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, C. D. (1997). Miscommunication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. R., Sandberg, J. G., Jeffrey, A. J., & Young-Davis, S. (2016). The impact of texting on perceptions of face-to-face communication in couples in different relationship stages. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15(4), 274–294. doi:10.1080/15332691.2015.1062452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettegrew, L. S., & Day, C. (2015). Smart phones and mediated relationships: The changing face of relational communication. The Review of Communication, 15(2), 122–139. doi:10.1080/15358593.2015.1044018
   Google Scholar
• Reid, F. J. M., & Reid, D. J. (2010). The expressive and conversational affordances of mobile messaging. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(1), 3–22. doi:10.1080/01449290701497079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics, 25, 201–218. doi:10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (April 1, 2015). U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. W., & Reinsch, N. L., Jr. (2011). Multicommunicating and episodic presence: Developing new constructs for studying new phenomena. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 181–193). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tzanne, A. (2000). Talking at cross-purposes: The dynamics of miscommunication. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Weigand, E. (1999). Misunderstanding: The standard case. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 763–785. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00068-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2013). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16, 5–23. doi:10.1177/1461444812472486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar