Serial Argument Goals, Tactics, and Outcomes in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships

References

• Bassick, M., Wilson Mumpower, S., & Lee, S. K. (2015, May). Attachment, conflict styles, and relational satisfaction of long distance romantic couples. Paper presented at the annual International Communication Association conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2014). Dyadic perceptions of goals, conflict strategies, and perceived resolvability in serial arguments. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 1–23. doi:10.1177/0265407513504653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Finan, A., & Kaminsky, A. (2008). Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model. Human Communication Research, 34, 600–624. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Hale, J. L., & Williams, S. L. (2004). Identifying and characterizing goals of dating partners engaging in serial argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 28–40. doi:10.1080/00028533.2004.11821616
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Tidgewell, K. D., Bardull, K. C., Cusanelli, L., Hartsern, M., Holbeck, D., & Hale, J. L. (2007). Serial argumentation goals and their relationships with perceived resolvability and choice of conflict tactics. Communication Quarterly, 55, 61–77. doi:10.1080/01463370600998640
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Vreeburg, S. K., Verdugo, S., & Sparks, L. (2012). Interpersonal conflict and health perceptions in long-distance caregiving relationships. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 747–761. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.650829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Cunningham, E. M., & Cody, M. J. (1988). Goal types, gender, and locus of control in managing interpersonal conflict. Communication Research, 15, 426–446. doi:10.1177/009365088015004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Center for the Study of Long Distance Relationships. (2018). Long distance relationship frequently asked questions 2018. Retrieved from http://www.longdistancerelationships.net/faqs.htm#How_common_are_long_distance_relationships
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Johnson, A. J., & Bostwick, E. N. (2018). Argument interdependence and its effects on serial argument goals and tactics in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. (Advanced online publication). doi:10.1177/0265407518774933
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Van Gilder, B., & Bruscella, J. S. (2017). Modeling serial argument goals, tactics, and their effects on arguers’ satisfaction in the case of three ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46, 74–95. doi:10.1080/17475759.2016.1254669
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1997). Explicating the goal construct: Tools for theorists. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 47–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (2004). The goals-plans-action model of interpersonal influence. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspective on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 185–206). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Allen, S. (2012). Serial arguments in organizations. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1, 312–330. doi:10.1075/jaic.1.3.03ham
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2012). Serial arguments in inter-ethnic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 430–445. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Richards, A. S., & Na, L. (2012). A test of the conflict linkage model in the context of serial arguments. Western Journal of Communication, 76, 459–479. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.703361
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future — A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63, 556–577. doi:10.1111/jcom.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25, 327–343. doi:10.1177/009365098025003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2015). LISREL 9.20 [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusun, S., & Norem, K. (1999). Challenges for higher education couples in commuter marriages: Insights for couples and counselors who work with them. Family Journal, 7, 125–134. doi:10.1177/1066480799072005
   Google Scholar
• Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). Features of serial arguing and coping strategies: Links with stress and well-being. In B. A. Le Poire & R. M. Dailey (Eds.), Applied interpersonal communication matters: Family, health, and community relations (pp. 39–66). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Merolla, A. J. (2010). Relational maintenance and noncopresence reconsidered: Conceptualizing geographic separation in close relationships. Communication Theory, 20, 169–193. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. W., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). The perceived characteristics of irresolvable, resolvable and resolved intimate conflicts: Is there evidence of intractability?. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17, 291–315. doi:10.1108/10444060610749464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151. doi:10.2307/351302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistole, M. C., & Roberts, A. (2011). Measuring long-distance romantic relationships: A validity study. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 44, 63–76. doi:10.1177/0748175611400288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Reznik, R. M. (2008). Communication during serial arguments: Connections with individuals’ mental and physical well-being. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 97–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Wright, C. N. (2009). Conflict avoidance: A functional analysis. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theory and applications (pp. 320–340). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlstein, E. M. (2004). Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 689–710. doi:10.1177/0265407504046115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L. (2010). Geographic distance and communication during courtship. Communication Research, 37, 275–297. doi:10.1177/0093650209356390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Difference between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality and Quantity, 43, 599–616. doi:10.1007/s11135007-9143-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp, R., & Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 1–11.
   Google Scholar