The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and Transition Events: A Social Media Volume and Sentiment Analysis

References

• Abromowitz, A. (2016, July 30). Donald Trump, partisan polarization, and the 2016 election. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/donald-trump-partisan-polarization-and-the-2016-presidential-election/
   Google Scholar
• Agiesta, J. (2017, January). CNN/ORC poll: Confidence drops in Trump transition. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/17/politics/trump-administration-approval-inauguration/
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, K. D., Campbell, C. R. M., Jr, & Park, R. (2005). An empirical examination of unusual fan behaviors: Basking in reflected failure and cutting off reflected success. Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, 16, 116–122.
   Google Scholar
• Blaylock, D. L. (2010). Basking in Reflected Glory. In R. L. Jackson & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of identity (pp. 57–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Broomfield, M. (2017, January). Women’s march against Donald Trump is the largest day of protests in US history, say political scientists. Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/womens-march-anti-donald-trump-womens-rights-largest-protest-demonstration-us-history-political-a7541081.html
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. M., Aiken, D., & Kent, A. (2004). Beyond BIRGing and CORFing: Continuing the exploration of fan behavior. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 13, 151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2015). Using sentiment analysis to monitor electoral campaigns: Method matters—evidence from the United States and Italy. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/0894439314521983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S. M., & Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16, 340–358. doi:10.1177/1461444813480466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflective glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406–415. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNN. (2016). 2016 election results. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/election/results
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M. R., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Icwsm, 133, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2016, October 25). The political environment on social media. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Enten, H. (2016, May 5). Americans distaste for both Trump and Clinton is record-breaking. Retrieved from https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-distaste-for-both-trump-and-clinton-is-record-breaking/
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2013). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gayo-Avello, D. (2013). A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 649–679. doi:10.1177/0894439313493979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, E. M., Young, D. M., Preston, A. G., Wilton, L. S., Gaither, S. E., & Kaiser, C. R. (2017). Loss and loyalty: Change in political and gender identity among Clinton supporters after the 2016 US presidential election. Self and Identity, 1–23. doi:10.1080/15298868.2017.1391873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govers, R. (2012). Brand Dubai and its competitors in the Middle East: An image and reputation analysis. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 8(1), 48–57. doi:10.1057/pb.2011.30
   Google Scholar
• Haridakis, P. M. (2012). Sport viewers and intergroup communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 344–356). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, H. M., Belkhouche, B., & Zaki, N. (2018). Semantic Twitter sentiment analysis based on a fuzzy thesaurus. Soft Computing. doi:10.1007/s00500-017-2994-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political Communication, 35, 470–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentish, B. (2016, December). Donald Trump has lost popular vote by greater margin than any US president. Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-lost-popular-vote-hillary-clinton-us-election-president-history-a7470116.html
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzelben, D. (2018, September 25). Is the record number of women candidates a 2018 blip — or a lasting trend? Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2018/09/25/651085628/is-the-record-number-of-women-candidates-a-2018-blip-or-a-lasting-trend
   Google Scholar
• Lachlan, K. A., & Levy, D. R. (2016). BIRGing and CORFing and Twitter activity following a political referendum: Examining social media activity concerning the 2014 Scottish independence vote. Communication Research Reports, 33, 217–222. doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1186625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachlan, K. A., Levy, D. R., & Xu, Z. (2018). The remaining, unconvinced few: Using Twitter to examine non-CORFing behaviors following a political defeat. Communication Quarterly, 66(4), 363–379. doi:10.1080/01463373.2017.1385498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. W. (2018, September). Using Twitter hashtags to gauge real-time changes in public opinion: An examination of the 2016 US presidential election. International Conference on Social Informatics (pp. 168–175). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• LGBT rights and equality. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/lgbt-equality/
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Lachlan, K. A., & Spence, P. R. (2016). Exploring extreme events on social media: A comparison of user reposting/retweeting behaviors on Twitter and Weibo. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 576–581. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757–769. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, S., & Gibson, G. (2017). In challenge to Trump, women protesters swarm streets across U.S. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-women-idUSKBN1550DW
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., Thompson, B., Cherry, J., Russell, M., Payne, H. J., Kirby, E. G., & Pfohl, W. (2015). Communication in the face of a school crisis: Examining the volume and content of social media mentions during active shooter incidents. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 238–248. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. B. (2009). Yes we did! Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure in the 2008 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 283–296. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01194.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2017, January). “Nearly 31 million Americans watch president Donald Trump’s inauguration. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2017/nearly-31-million-americans-watch-president-donald-trumps-inauguration.html (accessed July 28, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135. doi:10.1561/1500000011
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. (2016, July 1). Democratic party comes out strong for LGBTQ equality in 2016 part platform. Retrieved from https://www.hrc.org/blog/democratic-party-comes-out-strong-for-lgbtq-equality-in-2016-party-platform
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. P., & van Den Bosch, A. P. J. (2013). Relating political party mentions on Twitter with polls and election results. Proceedings of the 13th Dutch-Belgian Workshop on Information Retrieval (pp. 68–71). Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, S. (2016, November 7). Did social media ruin election 2016? Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2016/11/08/500686320/did-social-media-ruin-election-2016
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, L. R. (1979). The function and impact of sports for fans: A review of theory and contemporary research. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (pp. 219–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14, 872–895. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Himelboim, I. (2014). Mapping twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networksfrom-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., Lassegard, M., & Ford, C. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382–388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinda, J., Wann, D., & Hardin, R. (2016). Attachment to sports conferences: An expanded model of points of attachment among professional, collegiate, and high school football fans. Communication and Sport, 4(3), 347–362. doi:10.1177/2167479515578262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 267–307. doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). New York: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tjong Kim Sang, E., & Bos, J. (2012, April 23 –27). Predicting the 2011 Dutch Senate election results with Twitter. Paper presented at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Avignon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Trail, G. T., Anderson, D. F., & Fink, J. S. (2005). Consumer satisfaction and identity theory: A model of sport spectator conative loyalty. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14, 98–111.
   Google Scholar
• Trail, G. T., Fink, J. S., & Anderson, D. F. (2003). Sport spectator consumption behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Convention on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 178–185). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., & Narayanan, S. (2012). A system for real-time Twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 U.S. presidential election cycle. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., & Branscomb, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382–388. doi:10.1177/019372359001400203
   Google Scholar
• Wann, D. L., Hamlet, M. A., Wilson, T. M., & Hodges, J. A. (1995). Basking in reflected glory, cutting off reflected failure, and cutting off future failure: The importance of group identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 377–388. doi:10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158. doi:10.1177/1745691615569849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womensmarch.com. (2017). “Mission and vision,” http://www.womensmarch.com (accessed July 28, 2017).
   Google Scholar