Investigating and Extending Variation among Friends with Benefits Relationships: Relationship Maintenance and Social Support

References

• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M. W. (1995). Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 547–552. doi:10.1177/0265407595124008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beets, M. W., Cardinal, B. J., & Alderman, B. L. (2010). Parental social support and the physical activity-related behaviors of youth: A review. Health Education & Behavior, 37, 621–644. doi:10.1177/1090198110363884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., & Semic, B. A. (2002). A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 395–406. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781483327563
   Google Scholar
• Dailey, R. M., Brody, N., & Knapp, J. (2015). Friend support of dating relationships: Comparing relationship type, friend and partner perspectives. Personal Relationships, 22, 368–385. doi:10.1111/pere.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69, 52–66. doi:10.1080/03637750216533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes, A. (2012). Pillow talk: Exploring disclosures after sexual activity. Western Journal of Communication, 76, 91–108. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.651253
   Google Scholar
• Duck, S. W. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. The Gendered Society Reader, 3, 531–593.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424. doi:10.1080/00224490902775801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K., & Morman, M. T. (1998). The measurement of affectionate communication. Communication Quarterly, 46, 144–162. doi:10.1080/01463379809370092
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., & Chavez, A. M. (2005). Relational maintenance in cross-sex friendships characterized by different types of romantic intent: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 339–358. doi:10.1080/10570310500305471
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., Eloy, S. V., & Wabnik, A. I. (1993). Linking maintenance strategies to relationship development and disengagement: A reconceptualization. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 273–283. doi:10.1177/026540759301000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., & Mongeau, P. A. (2008). On becoming “more than friends”: The transition from friendship to romantic relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 175–194). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66. doi:10.1080/10570310500034154
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K. (2013). Four functions for four relationships: Consensus definitions of university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1407–1414. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0189-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: A compromise between men’s and women’s ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 460–470. doi:10.1080/00224490902775827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2011). Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 486–495. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.497984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, M., & Træen, B. (2013). Identifying ‘friends with benefits’ scripts among young adults in the Norwegian cultural context. Sexuality & Culture, 17, 83–99. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9140-7
   Google Scholar
• Knight, K. (2014). Communicative dilemmas in emerging adults’ friends with benefits relationships: Challenges to relational talk. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 270–279. doi:10.1177/2167696814549598
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M. (2010). Content-and medium-specific decomposition of friendship relational maintenance: Integrating equity and media multiplexity approaches. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 938–955. doi:10.1177/0265407510376254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, M. C. (2015). Hooking up as an individualistic practice: A double-edged sword for college women. Sexuality & Culture, 19, 464–492. doi:10.1007/s12119-015-9270-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelson, A. C., Floyd, K., & Pauley, P. M. (2011). Differential solicitude of social support in different types of adult sibling relationships. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 220–236. doi:10.1080/15267431.2011.554749
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Steinberg, M. (1975). Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., Knight, K., Williams, J., Eden, J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Identifying and explicating variation among friends with benefit relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 50, 37–47. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.623797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., Ramirez, A., & Vorell, M. (2003, February). Friends with benefits: An initial investigation of a sexual but not romantic relationship. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association, Salt Lake City, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., van Raalte, L. J., Generous, M. A., & Bednarchik, L. (2016). Friends with benefits relationships. In C. Sheehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies (Vol. 2, pp. 884–888). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs500
   Google Scholar
• Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2017). College men’s involvement in friends with benefits relationships. College Student Journal, 50, 398–403.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Friends with benefits relationships as a start to exclusive romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 982–996. doi:10.1177/0265407512448275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planalp, S. (1985). Relational schemata: A test of alternative forms of relational knowledge as guides to communication. Human Communication Research, 12, 3–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, B. (2014). Promiscuous intimacies: Rethinking the history of American casual sex. Journal of Historical Sociology, 27, 1–24. doi:10.1111/johs.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society, 25, 545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, C., Blais, M., Lavoie, F., Adam, B. D., Magontier, C., & Goyer, M. F. (2015). The structure of casual sexual relationships and experiences among single adults aged 18–30 years old: A latent profile analysis. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24, 215–227. doi:10.3138/cjhs.243-A1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (2009). Social support: Mapping the construct. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 113–120. doi:10.1177/0265407509105526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303. doi:10.1177/0265407510378125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E. (2011). Social support. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, A. D., MacKeigan, K. L., & MacDonald, H. A. (2011). Experiences and perceptions of young adults in friends with benefits relationships: A qualitative study. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weger, H., Cole, M., & Akbulut, V. (2018). Relationship maintenance across platonic and non-platonic cross-sex friendships in emerging adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159, 15–29. doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1439876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(3), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–566. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar