The Impacts of Political Internet Memes on Opinions: The Moderating Role of Political Party Identification

References

• Bisgaard, M. (2019). How getting the facts right can fuel partisan-motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisgaard, M., & Slothuus, R. (2018). Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R. (2013). The trappings of science: Media messages, scientific authority, and beliefs about paranormal investigators. Science Communication, 35(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012454599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denisova, A. (2020). Internet memes and society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Easley, C. (2018). Independents see immigration as a defining partisan issue. https://morning consult.com/2018/08/16/independents-see-immigration-defining-partisan-issue/
   Google Scholar
• Galipeau, T. (2023). The impact of political memes: A longitudinal experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 20(4), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2150737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Inc. (2022a). Guns. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gallup Inc. (2022b). Immigration. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.%20aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakokongas, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media & Society. 6(2), 205630512092157. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, H. E. (2016). Pepper spray cop and the American dream: Using synecdoche and metaphor to unlock internet memes’ visual political rhetoric. Communication Studies, 67(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1087414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, H. E. (2017). The affect and effect of internet memes: assessing perceptions and influence of online user-generated political discourse as media [ Doctoral dissertation]. Colorado State University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, H. E. (2020). Partisan cues and internet memes: Early evidence for motivated skepticism in audience message processing of spreadable political media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 28(3), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1614589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenti, B., & Miller, E. (2016). The persuasive force of political humor. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed. pp. 778–867). Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, N. N., & Mortensen, M. (2021). ‘Don’t panic people!’ Trump will tweet the virus away:’ Memes contesting and confirming populist political leaders during the COVID-19 crisis. information communication & society, 24(16), 2442–2458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1972127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, A. (2017). Internet meme and political discourse: A study on the impact of internet meme as a tool in communicating political satire. Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 6(3), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501366
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebo, M. J., & Cassino, D. (2007). The aggregated consequences of motivated reasoning and the dynamics of partisan presidential approval. Political Psychology, 28(6), 719–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiser, A. (2022). Psychological perspectives on participatory culture: Core motives for the use of political internet memes. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(1), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6377
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, B. A. (2022). Insidiously trivial: Meme format reduces perceived influence and intent to debate partisan claims. Media and Communication, 10(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1764/5mac.v10i3.5388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street Movement. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2357–2390. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L. (2009). The effects of viewing Grey’s anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802643563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2019). Internet memes, media frames, and the conflicting logics of climate change discourse. Environmental Communication, 13(7), 975–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salikin, R. M. M. N., & Sulaksono, T. (2022). The influence of political memes in social media on the level of political participation of beginner voters in the presidential election year 2019 in Karimun district [ Proceedings of the International Conference on Public Organization.]. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220209.053
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, K. (2021). Key facts about Americans and guns. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/13/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/
   Google Scholar
• Schiazza, G. (2021). Political internet memes and political learning: An experimental approach. Proceedings of the 16th Workshop of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://workshop-proceedings.icwsm.org/pdf/2022_41.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, K. M., Gunter, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204269390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political argument. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, H. D. (2022). “Make A-meme-rica great again!”: Studying the internet memes within the #maga and #trump2020 network during the 2020 US presidential election on Twitter. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 38(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.58997/smc.v38i1.101
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, B. E. (2020). The discursive power of memes in digital culture: Ideology, semiotics, and intertextuality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, E. F., Priniski, J. H., & Holyoak, K. J. (2022). The cognitive and emotional impact of politically-polarized internet memes about climate change. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 44). https://escholarship.org/ uc/item/9hk7673j
   Google Scholar
• Yokely, E. (2022). After Texas shooting, Republican and Independent voters drive increase in support for gun control. https://morningconsult.com/2022/05/26/support-for-gun-control-after-uvalde-shooting/
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701837073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., & Pinto, J. (2021). Changing the world one meme at a time: The effects of climate change memes on civic engagement intentions. Environmental Communication, 15(6), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1894197
   Google Scholar
• Zolides, A. (2022). “Don’t Fauci my Florida:” Anti-Fauci memes as digital anti-intellectualism. Media and Communication, 10(4), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar