Understanding Media Effects Through Media Technological Attributes: Young People’s Second Screening Use and Political Efficacy

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2008). Doing focus groups. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208956
   Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Diehl, T. (2017). Second screening and political persuasion on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Vaccari, C. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., & Gummadi, K. (2019). Optimizing the recency-relevancy trade-off in online news recommendations. Information Retrieval Journal, 22(5), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig, M. (2008). New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 2, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: citizens, communication and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• David, P., Song, M., Hayes, A., & Fredin, E. S. (2007). A cyclic model of information seeking in hyperlinked environments: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, M., Rowland, D., & Lawson, S. (2012). Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 79–86). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325635
   Google Scholar
• Dylko, I. (2014). Using technological attributes to study online media: The case of user-generated content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dylko, I., & McCluskey, M. (2012). Media effects in an era of rapid technological transformation: A case of user‐generated content and political participation. Communication Theory, 22(3), 250–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1967). The Child’s acquisition of regime norms: Political efficacy. The American Political Science Review, 61(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2003). A “mix of attributes” approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Diehl, T. (2019). News finds me perception and democracy: Effects on political knowledge, political interest, and voting. New Media & Society, 21(6), 1253–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818817548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia‐Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. AldineTransaction.
   Google Scholar
• Henn, M. A. T. T., Pontes, A. I., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Young people, citizenship education, and political engagement. Education Today, 66(1), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar, K. P., Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2014). Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. H., & Schechter, A. L. (2016). Technical skills required: How technological efficacy influences online political behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(3), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1203321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, T. (2006). The internet and tobacco cessation: The roles of internet self-efficacy and search task on the information-seeking process. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00026.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y. (2018). Understanding digital natives in contentious politics: Explaining the effect of social media on protest participation through psychological incentives. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3457–3478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817749519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúniga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitanova, M. (2020). Youth political participation in the EU: Evidence from a cross-national analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(7), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1636951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowald, D., & Lex, E. (2016). The influence of frequency, recency and semantic context on the reuse of tags in social tagging systems. Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 237–242). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2914586.2914617
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Kim, B., & Kim, Y. (2021). Towards engaged citizens: Influences of second screening on college students’ political knowledge and participation. Southern Communication Journal, 86(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2020.1846073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Zhou, S., & Zhang, H. (2020). Second screening use and its effect on political involvement in China: An integrated communication mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Zhou, S., & Zhang, H. (2023). Motivations, knowledge, efficacy, and participation: an osor model of second screening’s political effects in China. Journalism and Media, 4(3), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4030054
   Google Scholar
• Melia, K. M. (1997). Producing “plausible stories”: Interviewing students nurses. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 26–36). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208758.n2
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, J., & de Vreese, C. (2019). Spiral of political learning: The reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents. Communication Research, 46(8), 1078–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215605148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, M. D., & Sundar, S. S. (2019). Technological affordances can promote misinformation: what journalists should watch out for when relying on online tools and social media. In J. E. Katz & K. K. Mays (Eds.), Journalism and truth in an age of social media (pp. 182–198). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190900250.003.0013
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2018, December 12). Juggling act: Audiences have more media at their disposal and are using then simultaneously. Nielsen. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/juggling-act-audiences-have-more-media-at-their-disposal-and-are-using-them-simultaneously.html
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383
   Google Scholar
• Ognyanova, K., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2015). Political efficacy on the internet: A media system dependency approach. In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, & J. Schulz (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 3–27). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Luis, J. (2021, Feburary 2). Second screening: Understanding usage and audiences. Digital Turbine. https://www.digitalturbine.com/blog/consumer-research/second-screening-understanding-usage-and-audiences/
   Google Scholar
• Penney, J., & Dadas, C. (2014). (Re) tweeting in the service of protest: Digital composition and circulation in the occupy Wall Street movement. New Media & Society, 16(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813479593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran, W., & Yamamoto, M. (2019). Media multitasking, second screening, and political knowledge: Task-relevant and task-irrelevant second screening during election news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1565659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle, K., Potter, W. J., Metzger, M. J., Nabi, R. L., & Linz, D. G. (2011). Beyond cultivation: Exploring the effects of frequency, recency, and vivid autobiographical memories for violent media. Media Psychology, 14(2), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.573464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052945
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., Hirsch, M., Stevic, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). Politics–simply explained? How influencers affect youth’s perceived simplification of politics, political cynicism, and political interest. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(3), 738–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221088987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F., Wang, N., Guo, Z., & Guo, L. (2009). Online network size, efficacy, and opinion expression: Assessing the impacts of internet use in China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edp046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, D. M., Ridolfo, J., & Michel, A. J. (2012). The available means of persuasion: Mapping a theory and pedagogy of multimodal public rhetoric. Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1054998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, C., Van Thomme, J., Maurer, P., Hanna, A., Pevehouse, J., Shah, D. V., & Bucy, E. (2016). Coproduction or cooptation? real-time spin and social media response during the 2012 French and US presidential debates. French Politics, 14(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/10.1057/fp.2016.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q. (2013). Social recommendation, source credibility, and recency: Effects of news cues in a social bookmarking website. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013503158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar