Enhancement of Anisotropic Strength of Fused Deposited ABS Parts by Genetic Algorithm

REFERENCES

• Hill, N.; Haghi, M. Deposition direction-dependent failure criteria for fused deposition modelling polycarbonate. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2014, 20 (3), 221–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgun, I.; Ertan, R. Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2014, 20, 228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singamneni, S.; Roychoudhury, A.; Diegel, O.; Huang, B. Modeling and evaluation of curved layer fused deposition. Journal of Material Processing Technology 2012, 212, 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sood, A.K.; Ohdar, R.K.; Mahapatra, S.S. Experimental investigation and empirical modeling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. Journal of Advanced Research 2012, 3, 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bellini, A.; Guceri, S. Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2003, 9 (4), 252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.S.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, H.J.; Ahn S.H. Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts. Journal of Material Processing Technology 2007, 187–188, 627–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J.F.; Thomas, J.P.; Renaud, J.E. Design of fused deposition ABS components for stiffness and strength. Journal of Mechanical Design 2003, 125, 545–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.H.; Montero, M.; Odell, D.; Roundy, S.; Wright, P.K. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2002, 8 (4), 248–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Book of ASTM Standards Part 9 – Plastics. Carbon black. American Society for Testing and Materials 1961, 9 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S.; Sharma, V.S.; Sachdeva, A.; Sinha, S.K. Optimization and analysis of mechanical properties for selective laser sintered polyamide parts. Journal of Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2013, 28, 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, B.K.; Hakanen, J.; Miettinen, K.; Chakraborti, N. Genetic programming through bi-objective genetic algorithms with a study of a simulated moving bed process involving multiple objectives. Applied Soft Computing 2013, 13, 2613–2623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal, A.N.; Sarangi, K.; Pettersson, F.; Sen, P.K.; Saxen, H.; Chakraborti, N. Cu-Zn separation by supported liquid membrane analyzed through multi-objective genetic algorithms. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 107, 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. Design and analysis of experiments; Wiley Student Edition, 8e, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chockalingam, K.; Jawahar, N.; Chandrasekar, U.; Ramanathan, K.N. Establishment of process model for part strength in stereolithography. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2008, 208, 348–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K.; Prathap, A.; Agarwal, S.; Meyarivan, T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA2. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2002, 6, 182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Huang, Y.; Guo, J.; Chen, Y. Multi-objective optimization of 3D-surface topography of machining YG15 in WEDM. Journal of Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2014, 29, 514–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi, A.K.; Datta, S.; Deb, K. Investigation the role of non-metallic fillers in particulate-reinforced mold composites using EAs. Journal of Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2011, 26, 541–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegiel, F.; Sharma, S.; Rangaiah, G.P. Development and multiobjective optimization of improved cumene production process. Journal of Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2015, 30, 444–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestan, Z.; Klancnik, S.; Balic, J.; Brezocnik, M. Modeling and design of experiments of laser cladding process by genetic programming and nondominated sorting. Journal of Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2015, 30, 458–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar