Experimental Investigations of Process Parameters Influence on Rheological Behavior and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of FDM Manufactured Parts

REFERENCES

• Mohamed, O.A.; Masood, S.H.; Bhowmik, J.L. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Advances in Manufacturing 2015, 3, 42–53. doi:10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, A. Understanding Additive Manufacturing. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Onwubolu, G.C.; Rayegani, F. Characterization and optimization of mechanical properties of ABS parts manufactured by the fused deposition modelling process. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2014, 13. doi:10.1155/2014/598531.
   Google Scholar
• Savvakis, K.; Petousis, M.; Vairis, A.; Vidakis, N.; Bikmeyev, A. Experimental determination of the tensile strength of fused deposition modeling parts. In ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2014, doi:10.1115/IMECE2014-37553,V014T011A022-V014T011A022.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, B.N.; Bahubalendruni, M.R.; Biswal, B.B. A general regression neural network approach for the evaluation of compressive strength of FDM prototypes. Neural Computing and Applications 2014, 1129–1136. doi:10.1007/s00521-014-1788-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, B.N.; Bahubalendruni, M.R.; Biswal, B.B. Comparative evaluation of optimization algorithms at training of genetic programming for tensile strength prediction of FDM processed part. Procedia Materials Science 2014, 5, 2250–2257.
   Google Scholar
• Górski, F.; Kuczko, W.; Wichniarek, R.; Hamrol, A. Computation of mechanical properties of parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling using finite element method. In 10th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications 2015, 403–413.
   Google Scholar
• Khuong, T.L.; Gang, Z.; Farid, M.; Yu, R. Izod impact strength of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) materials after used in UP2 3D-Printer. Applied Mechanics and Materials Trans Tech Publ 2015, 713–715, 2737–2740.
   Google Scholar
• Gajdoš, I.; Kaščák, Ľ.; Spišák, E.; Slota, J. Flexural properties of FDM prototypes made with honeycomb and sparse structure. Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publ 2015, 635, 169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Nidagundi, V.B.; Keshavamurthy, R.; Prakash, C. Studies on parametric optimization for fused deposition modelling process. Materials Today: Proceedings 2015, 2, 1691–1699.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzotti, A.; Grasso, M.; Staiano, G.; Martorelli, M.; Pei, E.; Campbell, R.I. The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2015, 21, 604–617. doi:10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brensons, I.; Polukoshko, S.; Silins, A.; Mozga, N. FDM prototype experimental research of processing parameter optimization to achieve higher tensile stress. Solid State Phenomena. Trans Tech Publ 2015, 220–221, 767–773.
   Google Scholar
• Impens, D.; Urbanic, R. Assessing the impact of post-processing variables on tensile and compression characteristics for 3D printed components. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 652–657.
   Google Scholar
• Durgun, I.; Ertan, R. Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2014, 20, 228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arivazhagan, A.; Saleem, A.; Masood, S.; Nikzad, M.; Jagadeesh, K. Study of dynamic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling processed ULTEM material. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2014, 7, 307–315. DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.
   Google Scholar
• Gurrala, P.K.; Regalla, S.P. Multi-objective optimisation of strength and volumetric shrinkage of FDM parts: A multi-objective optimization scheme is used to optimize the strength and volumetric shrinkage of FDM parts considering different process parameters. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 2014, 9, 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, A.K.; Ohdar, R.K.; Mahapatra, S.S. Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. Journal of Advanced Research 2012, 3, 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• ASTMD5418–07. Standard Test Method for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Properties: In Flexure (Dual Cantilever Beam). West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• DMA2980. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis. Operator's Manual. New Castle: TA Instrument; 2002, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, C.M. Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: USA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C.; Anderson-Cook, C.M. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, A.K.; Ohdar, R.; Mahapatra, S. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Materials & Design 2010, 31, 287–295. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eujin, Pei D.; Lanzotti, A.; Grasso, M.; Staiano, G.; Martorelli, M. The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2015, 21, 604–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar