Solution to industrial optimization problems through differential evolution variants

References

• Chakraborti, N.; Shekhara, A.; Singhala, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Sripriya, R. Fluid flow in hydrocyclones optimized through multi-objective genetic algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2008, 16, 1023–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Jourdan, L.; Schutze, O.; Legrand, T.; Talbi, E.-G.; Wojkiewicz, J.L. An analysis of the effect of multiple layers in the multi-objective design of conducting polymer composites. Materials & Manufacturing Process 2009, 24, 350–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraskar, S.S.; Banwait, S.S.; Laroiya, S.C. Multiobjective optimization of electrical discharge machining process using a hybrid method. Materials & Manufacturing Process 2013, 28, 348–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, B.K.; Pettersson, F.; Saxén, H.; Chakraborti, N. Genetic programming evolved through bi-objective genetic algorithms applied to a blast furnace. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2013, 28 (7), 776–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farshid, Jafarian; Domenico, Umbrello; Saeid, Golpayegani; Zahra, Darake. Experimental investigation to optimize tool life and surface roughness in inconel 718 machining. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2016, 31 (13), 1683–1691, doi:10.1080/10426914.2015.1090592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chockalingam, K.; Jawahar, N.; Praveen, J. Enhancement of anisotropic strength of fused deposited ABS parts by genetic algorithm. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2015. doi:10.1080/10426914.2015.1127949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraju, S.; Vasantharaja, P.; Chandrasekhar, N.; Vasudevan, M.; Jayakumar, T. Optimization of welding process parameters for 9Cr-1Mo steel using RSM and GA. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2016, 31 (3), 319–327, doi:10.1080/10426914.2015.1025974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Klancnik; MiranBrezocnik; JozeBalic; Isak, Karabegovic. Programming of CNC milling machines using particle swarm optimization. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2013, 28 (7), 811–815, doi:10.1080/10426914.2012.718473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar, P.J.; Rao, R.V.; Davim, J.P. Multiobjective optimization of grinding process parameters using particle swarm optimization algorithm. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2010, 25 (6), 424–431, doi:10.1080/10426910903124860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munish, Kumar Gupta; Sood, P.K.; Vishal, S. Sharma. Machining parameters optimization of titanium alloy using response surface methodology and particle swarm optimization under minimum-quantity lubrication environment. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2016, 31 (13), 1671–1682, doi:10.1080/10426914.2015.1117632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiming, Li; Yu-Hsiang, Tseng. Hybrid differential evolution and particle swarm optimization approach to surface-potential-based model parameter extraction for nanoscale MOSFETs. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2011, 26 (3), 388–397, doi:10.1080/10426914.2010.526977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N.; Das, S.; Jayakanth, R.; Pekoz, R.; Erkoç, Ş. Genetic algorithms applied to Li+ ions contained in carbon nanotubes: An investigation using particle swarm optimization and differential evolution along with molecular dynamics. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2007, 22 (5), 562–569, doi:10.1080/10426910701319605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R.V.; Pawar, P.J.; Davim, J.P. Parameter optimization of ultrasonic machining process using nontraditional optimization algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2010, 25 (10), 1120–1130, doi:10.1080/10426914.2010.489788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, K. Genetic algorithms in polymeric material production, design, processing and other applications: A review. International Materials Reviews 2008, 53 (5), 275–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, Prateek; KedarKulkarni; KishalayMitra. A novel hybrid optimization methodology to optimize the total number and placement of wind turbines. Renewable Energy 2016, 86, 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, Prateek; KedarKulkarni; KishalayMitra. Multi-objective optimization of energy generation and noise propagation: A hybrid approach. In Indian Control Conference (ICC). IEEE, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Munjal, M.L. Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers with Application to Exhaust and Ventilation System Design. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, H.; Gatley, W.S.; Evensen, H.A. Noise Control for Engineers. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, L.J.; Chang, Y.C.; Chiu, M.C. Optimization of allocation and noise reduction on multi-noises system by using genetic algorithm. Noise Vibration Worldwide 2004, 35 (4), 11–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, T.S.; Chiu, M.C. Identification of noise sources in factory’s sound field by using genetic algorithm. Applied Acoustics 2008, 69, 733–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Pravesh; Millie, Pant. Noisy source recognition in multi noise plants by differential evolution. Swarm Intelligence (SIS), 2013 IEEE Symposium on IEEE, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Tarun Kumar; Millie, Pant. Identification of noise in multi noise plant using enhanced version of shuffled frog leaping algorithm. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, B.; Al-Khayyal, F. Machine parameter selection for turning with constraints: an analytical approach based on geometric programming. International Journal Production Research 1991, 29 (9), 1897–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A.V.S.; Rao, R.K.; Rao, V.K.S. Optimal selection of process parameter for turning operation in CAPP system. International Journal Production Research 1997, 35 (6), 1495–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, Y.V.; Leung, L.C.; Linn, R. Optimal machining conditions with cost of quality and tool maintenance for turning. International Journal of Production Research 2001, 39 (4), 647–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan, R.; Ashokan, P.; Sachithanandam, M. Comparative analysis of conventional and non-conventional optimization technique for CNC-turning process. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology 2001, 17, 471–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V.S.; Dhiman, S.; Sehgal, R.; Sharma, S.K. Estimation of cutting forces and surface roughness for hard turning using neural networks. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology 2008, 19 (4), 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, M.; Muralidhar, M.; Krishna, C.; Dixit, U. Application of soft computing techniques in machining performance prediction and optimization: A literature review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010, 46 (5), 445–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, A.R. Hybrid Taguchi-differential evolution algorithm for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. Applied Soft Computing 2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, Ali R. Hybrid Taguchi-differential evolution algorithm for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. Applied Soft Computing 2013, 13 (3), 1433–1439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Chao; et al. Energy-efficient multi-pass turning operation using multi-objective backtracking search algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn, R.; Price, K. Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 1997, 11 (4), 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brest, J.; Greiner, S.; Boskovic, B.; Mernik, M.; Zumer, V. Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2006, 10 (6), 646–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn, R. On the usage of differential evolution for function optimization. In Fuzzy Information Processing Society. NAFIPS, 1996. Biennial Conference of the North American, IEEE, 1996, June, pp. 519–523.
   Google Scholar
• Parouha, Raghav Prasad; KedarNath, Das. A memory based differential evolution algorithm for unconstrained optimization. Applied Soft Computing 2016, 38, 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, Hira; et al. A Novel mutation strategy for differential evolution. Problem Solving and Uncertainty Modeling through Optimization and Soft Computing Applications 2016, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Zaheer, Hira; et al. A Portfolio analysis of ten national banks through differential evolution. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Springer: Singapore, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S.; Suganthan, P.N. Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2011, 15 (1), 4–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, Kalyanmoy. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000, 186 (2), 311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, Pinkey; Millie, Pant; Kusum, Deep. Parameter optimization of multi-pass turning using chaotic PSO. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2015, 6 (2), 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Y.C.; Joo, Y.S. Optimization of machining conditions with practical constraints. International Journal Production Research 1992, 30 (12), 2907–2919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, H.Y.; Lampinen, J. A trigonometric mutation operation to differential evolution. Journal of Global Optimization 2003, 27, 105–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaelo, P.; Ali, M.M. A numerical study of some modified differential evolution algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 169, 1176–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Pravesh; Millie, Pant. Enhanced mutation strategy for differential evolution. 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Chii-Ruey. Simulated annealing: Theory and applications. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 1988, 12 (1), 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dorigo, Marco; Mauro, Birattari; Thomas, Stutzle. Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 2006, 1 (4), 28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R.; Batra, J.L.; Lal, G.K. Determination of optimal subdivision of depth of cut in multipass turning with constraints. International Journal of Production Research 1995, 33 (9), 2555–2565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar