Experimental analysis of magneto rheological abrasive flow finishing process on AISI stainless steel 316L

References

• Jayswal, S.C.; Jain, V.K.; Dixit, PM. Modeling and simulation of magnetic abrasive finishing process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2005, 26 (5), 477–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunil Jha.; Jain, V.K. Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2004, 44 (10), 1019–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunil, Jha.; Jain, V.K. Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear 2006, 261 (7–8), 856–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manas Das; Jain, V.K. Ghoshdastidar, PS. Fluid flow analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2008, 48 (3–4), 415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeid, K.; Mojtaba, E.; Fatahy, A. A novel approach of magnetorheological abrasive fluid finishing withswirling-assisted inlet flow. Results in Physics 2016, 6, 568–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manas Das; Jain, V.K.; Ghoshdastidar, P.S. Nano-finishing of stainless-steel tubes using rotational magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. Machining Science and Technology 2010, 14 (3), 365–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anant Kumar, S.; Sunil Jha.; Pulak, M.P. Performance analysis of ball end magnetorheological finishing process with MR polishing fluid. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2015, 30 (12), 1482–1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahendra, N.; Sunil, Jha.; Kotnala, R.K. Ball end magnetorheological finishing using bidisperse magnetorheological polishing fluid. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2014, 29 (4), 487–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinhua, L.; Lifeng, W.; He, Lu; Dongdong, W.; Qingqing, C.; Zhongbin, W. A study of the effect of nanometer Fe3O4 addition on the properties of silicone oil-based magnetorheological fluids. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2015, 30 (2), 204–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F.; Tian, Z.; Wu, X. Novel process to prepare high-performance magnetorheological fluid based on surfactants compounding. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2015, 30 (2), 210–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhirendra K. Singh; Jain, V.K.; Raghuram, V. Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2004, 149 (1–3), 22–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza, T.; Hamid, B. Artificial evolutionary approaches to produce smoother surface in magnetic abrasive finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2013, 27 (2), 533–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naresh Babu, M.; Muthukrishnan, N. Investigation on surface roughness in abrasive water-jet machining by the response surface method. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2014, 29 (11–12), 1422–1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devinder, P.; Rajesh Kumar, S. Optimization for turning of Al-6061-SiC-Gr hybrid Nanocomposites using response surface methodologies. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2016, 31 (10), 1342–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusup, N.; Zain, A.M.; Hashim, S.Z.M. Evolutionary techniques in optimizing machining parameters: review and recent applications (2007–2011). Expert System Application 2012, 39 (10), 9909–9927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusup, N.; Sarkheyli, A.; Zain, A.M.; Hashim, S.Z.M.; Ithnin, N. Estimation of optimal machining control parameters using artificial bee colony. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2014, 25 (6), 1463–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zain, A.M.; Haron, H.; Sharif, S. Application of GA to optimize cutting conditions for minimizing surface roughness in end milling machining process. Expert System Application 2010, 37 (6), 4650–4659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 8th edn; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.C.; Tsao, C.C.; Hsu, C.Y.; Hung, S.K.; Wen, D.C. Evaluation of the characteristics of the micro electrical discharge machining process using response surface methodology based on the central composite design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2012, 62 (9), 1013–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasakthivel, P.S.; Velmurugan, V.; Sudhakaran, R. Prediction of vibration amplitude from machining parameters by response surface methodology in end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2011, 53 (5), 453–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh Kumar, B.; Baskar, N. Integration of fuzzy logic with response surface methodology for thrust force and surface roughness modeling of drilling on titanium alloy. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013, 65 (9), 1501–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Taweel, T.A.; Gouda, S.A. Performance analysis of wire electrochemical turning process—RSM approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2011, 53 (1), 181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalin John, M.R.; Vinayagam, B.K. Optimization of ball burnishing process on tool steel (T215Cr12) in CNC machining centre using response surface methodology. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2011, 36 (7), 1407–1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X.S. Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms, 2nd edn; Lunver Press: Frome, UK, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X.S. Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: 5th Symposium on Stochastic Algorithms. Foundation and Applications (SAGA 2009), LNCS, 5792, 169–178.
   Google Scholar