Milling performance assessment of Ti-6Al-4V under CO₂ cooling utilizing coated AlCrN/TiAlN insert

References

• Gupta, K.; Laubscher, R. F. Sustainable Machining of Titanium Alloys: A Critical Review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2017, 231, 2543–2560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416634278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebaraj, M.; Kumar, M. P.; Anburaj, R. Effect of LN2 and CO2 Coolants in Milling of 55NiCrMoV7 Steel. J. Manuf. Processes 2020, 53, 318–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. N. S.; Ganesh, M. Performance Analysis of Machining Ti–6Al–4V under Cryogenic CO2 Using PVD-TiN Coated Tool. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2019, 19(3), 821–831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-019-00667-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Falahi, M.; Baharudin, B. T.; Hong, T. S.; Matori, K. A. Surface Defects in Groove Milling of Hastelloy-C276 under Fluid Coolant. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2016, 31(13), 1724–1732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1103854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundrák, J.; Mamalis, A. G.; Gyáni, K.; Markopoulos, A. Environmentally Friendly Precision Machining. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2006, 21(1), 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/AMP-200060612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroush, M.; Vafadar, A.; Hadad, M.; Jafarian, F. Experimental Investigation into the Effects of Nozzle Position, Workpiece Hardness, and Tool Type in MQL Turning of AISI 1045 Steel. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2018, 33(9), 1011–1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1401716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebaraj, M.; Kumar, M. P. End Milling of DIN 1.2714 Die Steel with Cryogenic CO2 Cooling. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 2407–2416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0439-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. S.; Singh, G.; Sorby, K. A Review on Minimum Quantity Lubrication for Machining Processes. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2015, 30(8), 935–953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.994759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedi, S. S.; Behera, G. C.; Datta, S. Effects of Cutting Speed on MQL Machining Performance of AISI 304 Stainless Steel Using Uncoated Carbide Insert: Application Potential of Coconut Oil and Rice Bran Oil as Cutting Fluids. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45(11), 8877–8893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04554-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. K.; Mia, M.; Jamil, M.; Singh, R.; Singla, A. K.; Song, Q.; Liu, Z.; Khan, A. M.; Rahman, M. A.; Sarikaya, M. Machinability Investigations of Hardened Steel with Biodegradable Oil-Based MQL Spray System. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 108, 735–748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05477-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G.; Pruncu, C. I.; Gupta, M. K.; Mia, M.; Khan, A. M.; Jamil, M.; Pimenov, D. Y.; Sen, B.; Sharma, V. S. Investigations of Machining Characteristics in the Upgraded MQL-Assisted Turning of Pure Titanium Alloys Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Materials (Basel) 2019, 12(6), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia, M.; Rifat, A.; Tanvir, M. F.; Gupta, M. K.; Hossain, M. J.; Goswami, A. Multi-Objective Optimization of Chip-Tool Interaction Parameters Using Grey-Taguchi Method in MQL-Assisted Turning. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2018, 129, 156–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamata, Y.; Obikawa, T. High Speed MQL Finish-Turning of Inconel 718 with Different Coated Tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 192–193, 281–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G. R.; Gupta, M. K.; Mia, M.; Sharma, V. S. Modeling and Optimization of Tool Wear in MQL-Assisted Milling of Inconel 718 Superalloy Using Evolutionary Techniques. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 97(1–4), 481–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1911-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia, M.; Dey, P. R.; Hossain, M. S.; Arafat, M. T.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Shoriat Ullah, M.; Tareq Zobaer, S. M. Taguchi S/N Based Optimization of Machining Parameters for Surface Roughness, Tool Wear and Material Removal Rate in Hard Turning under MQL Cutting Condition. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2018, 122, 380–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. N. S.; Manimaran, G.; Anwar, S.; Rahman, M. A.; Erdi Korkmaz, M.; Gupta, M. K.; Alfaify, A.; Mia, M. Investigation of Surface Modification and Tool Wear on Milling Nimonic 80A under Hybrid Lubrication. Tribol. Int. 2020, 106762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106762.
   Google Scholar
• Jebaraj, M.; Pradeep Kumar, M. Effect of Cryogenic CO2 and LN2 Coolants in Milling of Aluminum Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2019, 34(5), 511–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.1532591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebaraj, M.; Pradeep Kumar, M.; Yuvaraj, N.; Rahman, G. M. Effect of Cryogenic CO2 and LN2 Coolants in Milling of Aluminum Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2019, 34(12), 1411–1427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.1594271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S.; Rao, P. V. Comparison between Sustainable Cryogenic Techniques and Nano-MQL Cooling Mode in Turning of Nickel-Based Alloy. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1036–1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayed, Y.; Germain, G.; Melsio, A. P.; Kowalewski, P.; Locufier, D. Impact of Supply Conditions of Liquid Nitrogen on Tool Wear and Surface Integrity When Machining the Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 93(1–4), 1199–1206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0604-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhananchezian, M.; Rajkumar, K. Cryogenic Turning of Hastelloy C-22. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 22, 3075–3081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.443.
   Google Scholar
• Zindani, D.; Kumar, K.; Brief, A. Review on Cryogenics in Machining Process. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2(6), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2899-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebaraj, M.; Pradeep Kumar, M.; Yuvaraj, N.; Anburaj, R. Investigation of Surface Integrity in End Milling of 55NiCrMoV7 Die Steel under the Cryogenic Environments. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2020, 24(3), 465–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2019.1698612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherzadeh, A.; Budak, E. Investigation of Machinability in Turning of Difficult-to-Cut Materials Using a New Cryogenic Cooling Approach. Tribol. Int. 2018, 119, 510–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacHai, C.; Biermann, D. Machining of β-Titanium-Alloy Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al under Cryogenic Conditions: Cooling with Carbon Dioxide Snow. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2011, 211(6), 1175–1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. N. S.; Manimaran, G. Effect of Cryogenic Coolant on Machinability of Difficult-to-Machine Ni–Cr Alloy Using PVD-TiAlN Coated WC Tool. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1552-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbah, M.; Yallese, M. A.; Aouici, H.; Mabrouki, T.; Rigal, J. F. Comparative Assessment of Wiper and Conventional Ceramic Tools on Surface Roughness in Hard Turning AISI 4140 Steel. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2013, 46(9), 3041–3056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia, M. Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of MQL Assisted End Milling Characteristics Based on RSM and Taguchi Method. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2018, 121, 249–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivaiah, P.; Chakradhar, D. Analysis and Modeling of Cryogenic Turning Operation Using Response Surface Methodology. Silicon 2018, 10(6), 2751–2768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9816-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zain, A. M.; Haron, H.; Sharif, S. Prediction of Surface Roughness in the End Milling Machining Using Artificial Neural Network. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(2), 1755–1768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia, M.; Dhar, N. R. Prediction of Surface Roughness in Hard Turning under High Pressure Coolant Using Artificial Neural Network. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2016, 92, 464–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkata Rao, K.; Murthy, P. B. G. S. N. Modeling and Optimization of Tool Vibration and Surface Roughness in Boring of Steel Using RSM, ANN and SVM. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 29(7), 1533–1543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1197-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mia, M.; Khan, M. A.; Dhar, N. R. Study of Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces Using ANN, RSM, and ANOVA in Turning of Ti-6Al-4V under Cryogenic Jets Applied at Flank and Rake Faces of Coated WC Tool. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 93(1–4), 975–991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0566-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, T. S.; Balasivanandha Prabu, S.; Manivasagam, G.; Padmanabhan, K. A. Comparison of TiAlN, AlCrN, and AlCrN/TiAlN Coatings for Cutting-Tool Applications. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2014, 21(8), 796–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-014-0973-y.
   Google Scholar
• Okafor, A. C.; Nwoguh, T. O. Comparative Evaluation of Soybean Oil–Based MQL Flow Rates and Emulsion Flood Cooling Strategy in High-Speed Face Milling of Inconel 718. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107(9–10), 3779–3793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05248-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, C. J.; Rao, D. N.; Srihari, P. Influence of Cutting Parameters on Cutting Force and Surface Finish in Turning Operation. Procedia Eng. 2013, 64, 1405–1415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.222.
   Google Scholar
• Kilickap, E.; Yardimeden, A.; Çelik, Y. H. Mathematical Modelling and Optimization of Cutting Force, Tool Wear and Surface Roughness by Using Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology in Milling of Ti-6242S. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7(10), 1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101064.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Yang, Y. Bounds on the Number of Hidden Neurons in Three-Layer Binary Neural Networks. Neural Networks 2003, 16(7), 995–1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00006-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, R.; Joshi, A. G.; Manjaiah, M. Experimental Investigation on Tool Wear in AISI H13 Die Steel Turning Using RSM and ANN Methods. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 2311–2325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05038-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labidi, A.; Tebassi, H.; Belhadi, S.; Khettabi, R.; Yallese, M. A. Cutting Conditions Modeling and Optimization in Hard Turning Using RSM, ANN and Desirability Function. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2018, 18(4), 1017–1033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-018-0501-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar