Machinability Studies on Commercially Pure Titanium (Grade-2) Under Cryogenic Condition

References

• Khan, A.; Maity, K. A Comprehensive GRNN Model for the Prediction of Cutting Force, Surface Roughness and Tool Wear During Turning of CP-Ti Grade 2. Silicon. 2018, 10(5), 2181–2191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9749-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palraj, S.; Venkatachari, G. Effect of Biofouling on Corrosion Behaviour of Grade 2 Titanium in Mandapam Seawaters. Desalination. 2008, 230(1–3), 92–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh, S.; Karunamoorthy, L.; Palanikumar, K. Fuzzy Modeling and Analysis of Machining Parameters in Machining Titanium Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2008, 23(4), 439–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910801976676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A.; Maity, K. Comparative Study of Some Machinability Aspects in Turning of Pure Titanium with Untreated and Cryogenically Treated Carbide Inserts. J. Manuf. Process. 2017, 28, 272–284. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawaid, A.; Che-Haron, C.; Abdullah, A. Tool Wear Characteristics in Turning of Titanium Alloy Ti-6246. J. Mater. Process Technol. 1999, 92, 329–334. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00246-0.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. S.; Dogra, M.; Suri, N. Cooling Techniques for Improved Productivity in Turning. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 2009, 49(6), 435–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMACHTOOLS.2008.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahir, I.; Attia, H.; Biermann, D.; Duflou, J.; Klocke, F.; Meyer, D.; Newman, S.; Pusavec, F.; Putz, M.; Rech, J., et al. Cryogenic Manufacturing Processes. CIRP Annals. 2016, 65(2), 713–736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. Y.; Zhao, Z. Thermal Aspects, Material Considerations and Cooling Strategies in Cryogenic Machining. Clean Prod. Processes. 1999, 1(2), 107–116. DOI: 10.1007/s100980050016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. Y.; Ding, Y. Cooling Approaches and Cutting Temperatures in Cryogenic Machining of Ti-6al-4V. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 2001, 41(10), 1417–1437. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00026-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V.; Rao, G. K. M.; Rao, D. H. Optimization and Effect of Process Parameters on Tool Wear in Turning of Titanium Alloy Under Different Machining Conditions. Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf. 2014, 2(4), 272–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMMM.2014.V2.141.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z.; An, Q.; Xu, J.; Chen, M.; Han, S. Wear Performance of (Nc-Altin)/(a-Si3n4) Coating and (Nc-Alcrn)/(a-Si3n4) Coating in High-Speed Machining of Titanium Alloys Under Dry and Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Conditions. Wear. 2013, 305(1–2), 249–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, S.; Pradeep Kumar, M.; Dhananchezian, M.; Yuvaraj, N. Investigation of Monolayer Coated WC Inserts on Turning Ti-Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2020, 35(7), 826–835. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2020.1711930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrani, A.; Dhokia, V.; Newman, S. T. Investigation of the Effects of Cryogenic Machining on Surface Integrity in CNC End Milling of Ti–6al–4V Titanium Alloy. J. Manuf. Process. 2016, 21, 172–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. I.; Ismail, A. F.; Abakr, Y.; Amin, A. N. Effectiveness of Cryogenic Machining with Modified Tool Holder. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 185(1–3), 91–96. DOI: 10.1016/2Fj.jmatprotec.2006.03.123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari, H.; Sharif, S.; Izman, S.; Jafari, H.; Kurniawan, D. Cutting Force and Surface Roughness Characterization in Cryogenic High-Speed End Milling of Ti–6al-4V ELI. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2014, 29(3), 350–356. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2013.872257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoop, J.; Sales, W. F.; Jawahir, I. High Speed Cryogenic Finish Machining of Ti-6al4v with Polycrystalline Diamond Tools. J.Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 250, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. K.; Sood, P. K.; Singh, G.; Sharma, V. S. Sustainable Machining of Aerospace Material–Ti (Grade-2) Alloy: Modeling and Optimization. J. Cleaner Prod. 2017, 147, 614–627. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A.; Maity, K. Influence of Cutting Speed and Cooling Method on the Machinability of Commercially Pure Titanium (CP-Ti) Grade II. J. Manuf. Process. 2018, 31, 650–661. DOI: 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2017.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A.; Maity, K. Machinability Assessment of Commercially Pure Titanium (CP-Ti) During Turning Operation: Application Potential of GRA Method. Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/338/1/012005.
   Google Scholar
• Pekşen, H.; Kalyon, A. Optimization and Measurement of Flank Wear and Surface Roughness via Taguchi Based Grey Relational Analysis. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2021, 36(16), 1865–1874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.1926497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. K.; Sood, P.; Sharma, V. S. Machining Parameters Optimization of Titanium Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology and Particle Swarm Optimization Under Minimum-Quantity Lubrication Environment. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31(13), 1671–1682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1117632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, S.; Dass, K. Optimization of Machining Parameters in Turning of Titanium (Grade-5) Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2012, 27(5), 531–537. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2011.593236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, U.; Ribeiro, M. Ti6al4v Titanium Alloy End Milling with Minimum Quantity of Fluid Technique Use. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31(7), 905–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1048367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh, S.; Karunamoorthy, L.; Palanikumar, K. Surface Roughness Analysis in Machining of Titanium Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2008, 23(2), 174–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910701774700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A.; Maity, K. Statistical Modelling and Machinability Assessment of Commercially Pure Titanium (CP-Ti) Grade II: An Experimental Investigation. Measurement. 2019, 137, 664–672. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivalingam, V.; Sun, J.; Selvam, B.; Murugasen, P. K.; Yang, B.; Waqar, S. Experimental Investigation of Tool Wear in Cryogenically Treated Insert During End Milling of Hard Ti Alloy. J. Brazil. Soci. Mech. Sci. Engg. 2019, 41(2), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1612-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivalingam, V.; Zhuoliang, Z.; Jie, S.; Baskaran, S.; Yuvaraj, N.; Gupta, M. K.; Aqib, M. K. Use Of Atomized Spray Cutting Fluid Technique For The Turning Of A Nickel BaseSuperalloy. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2021, 36(3), 373–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1832687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James Dhilip, J. D.; Jeevan, J.; Arulkirubakaran, D.; Ramesh, M. Investigation And Optimization Of Parameters For Hard Turning Of OHNS Steel. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2020, 35(10), 1113–1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1765254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G.; Aggarwal, V.; Singh, S. Experimental Investigations Into Machining Performance Of Hastelloy C-276 In Different Cooling Environments. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2021, 36(15), 1789–1799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.1945099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paturi, U. M. R.; Cheruku, S.; Salike, S.; Pasunuri, V. P. K.; Reddy, N. Estimation Of Machinability Performance In Wire-EDM On Titanium Alloy Using Neural Networks. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2022, 37(9), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2030875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar