Comparison of Conventional and Microcellular Injection Using New Chemical Agents

References

• M, B. D. Plastic Injection Molding Manufacturing Process Fundamentals, 1st ed.; Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn Michigan, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Szych, P.; Kürten, A. The New Process for Lightweight Foaming, 1st ed.; Carl Hanser Verlag: Germany, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M.; Chang, R.; Hsu, C. Molding Simulation: Theory and Practice. 1st. Springer: Munich; 2018:pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.3139/9781569906200.001.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D.; Liu, T.; Zhao, L.; Yuan, X.-S.; Yuan, W.-K. Foaming of Polylactic Acid) Based on Its Non-Isothermal Crystallization Behavior Under Compressed Carbon Dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50(4), 1997–2007. DOI: 10.1021/ie101723g.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, W.; Yu, J.; Wu, J.; Ma, W.; He, J. A Volume in Micro and Nano Technologies. In Design and Applications of Nanostructured Polymer Blends and Nanocomposite Systems; 1st; Sabu, T., Rober, S., Sarat, C., Eds. Elsevier: United States, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/C2013-0-13999-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Z.; Ohyabu, H.; Sato, Y.; Inomata, H.; Smith, R. Solubility, Swelling Degree and Crystallinity of Carbon Dioxide–Polypropylene System. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2007, 45(2), 452–461. DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2006.07.016.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. H.; CD, H. A Study of Bubble Nucleation in a Mixture of Molten Polymer and Volatile Liquid in a Shear Flow Field. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1988, 47(24), 1616–1627. DOI: 10.1002/pen.760282408.
   Google Scholar
• Areerat, S.; Funami, E.; Hayata, Y.; Nakagawa, D.; Ohshima, M. Measurement and Prediction of Diffusion Coefficients of Supercritical CO2 in Molten Polymers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2004, 44(2), 1915–1924. DOI: 10.1002/pen.20194.
   Google Scholar
• Arefmanesh, A.; Advani, S. G.; EE, M. Inter. J. Heat Mass Transf 1st; Manisha, Advani S.G., Michaelides I., Eds. Elsevier: United Kingdom, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• DC, V. Modeling Diffusion-Induced Bubble Growth in Polymer Liquids. Cell. Polym. 2003, 22(2), 89–101. DOI: 10.1177/026248930302200202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. F.; Suh, N. P.; Shimbo, M.; Vacanti, J. P.; Langer, R. Novel Approach to Fabricate Porous Sponges of Poly(d,l-Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) without the Use of Organic Solvents. Cell. Polym. 1996, 17(14), 1417–1422. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87284-X.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. B.; Baldwin, D. F; Suh, N. P. An Extrusion System for the Processing of Microcellular Polymer Sheets: Shaping and Cell Growth Control, Polymer Engineering and Science, 1996, 36(10), 1425–1435.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. B.; Baldwin, D. F.; NP, S. Effect of the Pressure Drop Rate on Cell Nucleation in Continuous Processing of Microcellular Polymers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1995, 35(5), 432–440. DOI: 10.1002/pen.760350509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, M. Trexel Marketing Presentation, Lunch and Learn Conference, Wilmington, US. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• OS, K. The Effects of Injection Parameters and Foaming Agent on Dimensional Accuracy of Produced Parts in Plastic Injection Molding. Acta Phys. Polonica A. 2019, 135(5), 1028–1032. DOI: 10.12693/APhysPolA.135.1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, K.; Sohn, J.; Ryu, Y.; Kim, S.; Cha, S. Warpage Reduction of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Using Microcellular Foaming Process Applied Injection Molding. Polymers. 2019, 11(36), 1–12. DOI: 10.3390/polym11020360.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, X.; Thompson, M. R.; Hrymak, A. N.; Torres, A. Rheological Comparison of Chemical and Physical Blowing Agents in a Thermoplastic Polyolefin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45(8), 2734–2740. DOI: 10.1021/ie0510932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J.; Vincent, M.; Agassant, J.; Claverie, A.; Huck, S. Morphological Analysis of Microcellular PP Produced in a Core-Back Injection Process Using Chemical Blowing Agents and Gas Counter Pressure. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2015, 55(11), 2465–2473. DOI: 10.1002/pen.24136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo, C.; Antonio, J.; Ignacio, J.; Pe´rez, M. Moulded Polypropylene Foams Produced Using Chemical or Physical Blowing Agents: Structure–Properties Relationship. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47(15), 5680–5692. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6357-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reglero, R. J. A.; Vincent, M.; Agassant, J. F.; Sadik, T.; Pillon, C.; Carrot, C. Polymer Foaming with Chemical Blowing Agents: Experiment and Modeling. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2015, 55(9), 2018–2029. DOI: 10.1002/pen.24044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E.; Mayesha, B.; X, L.; Mohebbi, A.; Park, C. Optimizing Chemical Blowing Agent Content in Foam Injection Molding Process of Polypropylene. SPE. Antec. 2017, 30, 10)1571–1574.
   Google Scholar
• Unal, H.; Yetzin, S. H. Investigation of the Effect of Process Conditions on the Mechanical Properties and Cell Morphology of Polypropylene Foam Material, 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), Elazığ, Turkey, 16-18 May, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M.; Hrymak, R.; Torres, N. Rheology Studies of Polyethylene/Chemical Blowing Agent Solutions within an Injection Molding Machine. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2005, 45(8), 1108–1118. DOI: 10.1002/pen.20371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasihi, M.; Targhi, A. A.; Bayat, H. The Simultaneous Effect of Nucleating and Blowing Agents on the Cellular Structure of Polypropylene Foamed via the Extrusion Process. E-Polymers. 2016, 16(3), 235–241. DOI: 10.1515/epoly-2016-0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, B.; Oktem, H. Comparative Flow Analysis and Production of Plastic Injection and Various Endothermic Chemical Blowing Agent Process, International Marmara Science Conference, İzmit, Kocaeli, 769–776, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jingyi, X. Microcellular Injection Molding, 1st ed.; New york: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Altstädt, V.; Mantey, A. Thermoplast-Schaumspritzgießen. 2nd Carl Hanser Verlag, München; 2010. DOI: 10.3139/9783446425743.
   Google Scholar
• Mold Flow Insight Ultimate, Simulation Program, Version 2018; Autodesk Company: USA, 2018.
   Google Scholar