Machinability analysis during finish turning Ti6Al4V with varying cutting edge radius

References

• Tan, R.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, S.; Zou, X.; Guo, S.; Hu, Z.; Sun, T. Study on Ultra-Precision Processing of Ti-6Al-4V with Different Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Cutting Modes. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2019, 34(12), 1380–1388. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1660788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. P.; S, P.; Samuel Raj, D.; Hussain, S.; Ravi Shankar, V.; Raj, N. Optimization of Jet Position and Investigation of the Effects of Multijet MQCL During End Milling of Ti-6Al-4V. J. Manuf. Processes. 2021, 64(July 2020), 392–408. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.038.
   Google Scholar
• Umanath, K.; Devika, D.; Rashia Begum, S. Experimental Investigation of Role of Particles Size and Cutting Passes in Abrasive Waterjet Machining Process on Titanium Alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) Using Taguchi’s Method. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2021, 36(8), 936–949. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2020.1866202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A.; Kuriachen, B.; Dhanish, P. B.; Mathew, J. Experimental Investigations into the Influence of AlSi-10Mg Soft Tool Coating on the Machinability of Ti6Al4V. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2022, 37(12), 1422–1432. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1981934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhananchezian, M.; Rajkumar, K.; S, P. Cutting Velocity Influenced Machinability of Monel 400 by Coated Tool. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2022, 38(1), 116–125. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2022.2105883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvakumar, S.; Sreebalaji, V. S.; Ravikumar, K. Machinability Analysis and Optimization in Micro Turning on Tool Wear for Titanium Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2021, 36(7), 792–802. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2020.1866198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui, L.; Khlifi, H.; Bouzid Sai, W.; Hamdi, H. Tool Nose Radius Effects in Turning Process. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2020, 25(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2020.1815038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, F.; Ko, T. J.; Kurniawan, R.; Kwack, Y. Machinability Analysis of Difficult-To-Cut Material During Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Ball End Milling. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2021, 36(15), 1734–1745. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1944194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priarone, P. C.; Rizzuti, S.; Settineri, L.; Vergnano, G. Effects of Cutting Angle, Edge Preparation, and Nano-Structured Coating on Milling Performance of a Gamma Titanium Aluminide. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2012, 212(12), 2619–2628. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denkena, B.; Lucas, A.; Bassett, E. Effects of the Cutting Edge Microgeometry on Tool Wear and Its Thermo-Mechanical Load. CIRP Ann - Manuf. Technol. 2011, 60(1), 73–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denkena, B.; Koehler, J.; Rehe, M. Influence of the Honed Cutting Edge on Tool Wear and Surface Integrity in Slot Milling of 42CrMo4 Steel. Procedia CIRP. 2012, 1(1), 190–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.033.
   Google Scholar
• Denkena, B.; Köhler, J.; Breidenstein, B.; Abrão, A. M.; Ventura, C. E. H. Influence of the Cutting Edge Preparation Method on Characteristics and Performance of PVD Coated Carbide Inserts in Hard Turning. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 254, 447–454. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aurich, J. C.; Zimmermann, M.; Leitz, L. The Preparation of Cutting Edges Using a Marking Laser. Prod. Eng. 2011, 5(1), 17–24. DOI: 10.1007/s11740-010-0275-9.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Biermann, D.; Aßmuth, R.; Arif, A. F. M.; Veldhuis, S. C. Effects on Tool Performance of Cutting Edge Prepared by Pressurized Air Wet Abrasive Jet Machining (PAWAJM). J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2020, 277(October 2019), 116456. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116456.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R.; Köhler, J.; Denkena, B. Influence of the Tool Corner Radius on the Tool Wear and Process Forces During Hard Turning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 58(9–12), 933–940. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3451-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura, C. E. H.; Chaves, H. S.; Campos Rubio, J. C.; Abrão, A. M.; Denkena, B.; Breidenstein, B. The Influence of the Cutting Tool Microgeometry on the Machinability of Hardened AISI 4140 Steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90(9–12), 2557–2565. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9582-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiele, J. D.; Melkote, S. N. Effect of Cutting Edge Geometry and Workpiece Hardness on Surface Generation in the Finish Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1999, 94(2), 216–226. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00111-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T.; Zhou, J. M.; Bushlya, V.; Ståhl, J. E. Effect of Cutting Edge Radius on Surface Roughness and Tool Wear in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 91(9–12), 3611–3618. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0065-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawade, R. S.; Joshi, S. S. Mechanism of Chip Formation in High-Speed Turning of Inconel 718. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2011, 15(1), 132–152. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2011.557974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B.; Zhang, S.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, J. Effect of Edge Hone Radius on Chip Formation and Its Microstructural Characterization in Hard Milling of AISI H13 Steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 97(1–4), 305–318. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-1933-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woon, K. S.; Rahman, M.; Fang, F. Z.; Neo, K. S.; Liu, K. Investigations of Tool Edge Radius Effect in Micromachining: A FEM Simulation Approach. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 195(1–3), 204–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyson Selvakumar, S.; Sakthivel, P.; Praveen, J. A.; Samuel Raj, D. Effect of Edge Radius on Forces, Tool Wear and Surface Integrity Under Edge Radius Dominated Tool-Chip Contact Conditions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/09544054221147643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarian, F.; Umbrello, D.; Jabbaripour, B. Identification of New Material Model for Machining Simulation of Inconel 718 Alloy and the Effect of Tool Edge Geometry on Microstructure Changes. Simul. Model Pract. Theory. 2016, 66, 273–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2016.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arisoy, Y. M.; Özel, T. Prediction of Machining Induced Microstructure in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Using 3-D FE-Based Simulations: Effects of Tool Micro-Geometry, Coating and Cutting Conditions. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 220, 1–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai, V.; Lee, I.; Park, H. W. Finite Element Modeling of Three-Dimensional Milling Process of Ti-6Al-4V. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2014, 29(5), 564–571. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2014.892618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel, T.; Llanos, I.; Soriano, J.; Arrazola, P. J. 3d Finite Element Modelling of Chip Formation Process for Machining Inconel 718: Comparison of FE Software Predictions. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2011, 15(1), 21–46. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2011.557950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajehzadeh, M.; Razfar, M. R. FEM and Experimental Investigation of Cutting Force During UAT Using Multicoated Inserts. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2015, 30(7), 858–867. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2014.973590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, C.; Zhang, L. Effect of Cutting Conditions on the Serrated Chip Formation in High-Speed Cutting. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2013, 17(1), 26–40. DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2012.747887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B. S.; Zuo, J. M.; Wang, M. L.; Hou, J. M. Prediction of Milling Force Based on Numerical Simulation of Oblique Cutting. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2012, 27(10), 1011–1016. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2011.654150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, F. C.; Ventura, C. E. H.; Abrão, A. M.; Denkena, B. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Hard Turning with Multi-Chamfered Cutting Edges. J. Manuf. Processes. 2020, 49(February 2019), 126–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.025.
   Google Scholar
• Karpat, Y.; Özel, T. Process Simulations for 3D Turning Using Uniform and Variable Microgeometry PCBN Tools. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2008, 4(1), 26–38. DOI: 10.1504/IJMMM.2008.020908.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, T. Computational Modelling of 3D Turning: Influence of Edge Micro-Geometry on Forces, Stresses, Friction and Tool Wear in PcBn Tooling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209(11), 5167–5177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thepsonthi, T.; Özel, T. 3-D Finite Element Process Simulation of Micro-End Milling Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy: Experimental Validations on Chip Flow and Tool Wear. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 221, 128–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A.; Zang, J.; Zhao, J. Effect of Cutting Parameters and Tool Rake Angle on the Chip Formation and Adiabatic Shear Characteristics in Machining Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107(7–8), 3077–3091. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05145-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, G.-C.; Zhang, X.-M.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Zhang, D.; Outeiro, J.; Liu, H.-G.; Ding, H. Effects of Cutting Edge Radius on Surface Integrity in Machining of Nickel-Based Cast Superalloy: An in situ Imaging Approach. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2022, 144(12), 1–10. DOI: 10.1115/1.4055148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam, S.; Liang, S. Y. Effects of Ploughing Forces and Friction Coefficient in Microscale Machining. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2007, 129(2), 274–280. DOI: 10.1115/1.2673449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming, W.; Dang, J.; An, Q.; Chen, M. Chip Formation and Hole Quality in Dry Drilling Additive Manufactured Ti6Al4V. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2020, 35(1), 43–51. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1692353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, N. Kinematic Characterization of Chip Lateral-Curl—the Third Pattern of Chip Curl in Machining. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2002, 124(3), 667. DOI: 10.1115/1.1468225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyak, M.; Altan, M.; Altan, E. Prediction of Chip Flow Angle in Orthogonal Turning of Mild Steel by Neural Network Approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2007, 33(3–4), 251–259. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0460-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Jawahir, I. S. Recent Advances in Plasticity Applications in Metal Machining: Slip-Line Models for Machining with Rounded Cutting Edge Restricted Contact Grooved Tools. Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater. 2007, 2(3–4), 347–360. DOI: 10.1504/ijmmm.2007.015471.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, S. E.; Selvaganesh, R.; Khoshick, G.; Samuel Raj, D. A Novel Contact Area Based Analysis to Study the Thermo-Mechanical Effect of Cutting Edge Radius Using Numerical and Multi-Sensor Experimental Investigation in Turning. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 293(February), 117085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117085.
   Google Scholar
• Gerami, M.; Farahnakian, M.; Elhami Joosheghan, S. Effect of Grooving Textured Tool on the Titanium Chip Morphology. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2022, 37(9), 1013–1021. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2021.2001515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Zuo, Z.; Chen, D.; An, Q.; Chen, M.; Wang, H. Experimental Study on Chip Formation and Surface Quality in Milling of TiB 2/Al Alloy Composites. Mater. Manuf. Processes. 2020, 35(15), 1671–1679. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2020.1779937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariprasad, B.; Selvakumar, S. J.; Samuel Raj, D. Effect of Cutting Edge Radius on End Milling Ti–6Al–4V Under Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication – Chip Morphology and Surface Integrity Study. Wear. 2022, 498–499(August 2021), 204307. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204307.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, S.; Tewari, A.; Joshi, S. Influence of Preheating on Chip Segmentation and Microstructure in Orthogonal Machining of Ti6Al4V. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME. 2013, 135(6), 1–11. DOI: 10.1115/1.4025741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B.; Zhang, S.; Fang, Y. Effect of Edge Hone Radius on Plowing-Induced Plastic Deformation in Hard Milling: Analytical Modeling and Experimental Validation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105(7–8), 3017–3029. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04491-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kountanya, R.; Al-Zkeri, I.; Altan, T. Effect of Tool Edge Geometry and Cutting Conditions on Experimental and Simulated Chip Morphology in Orthogonal Hard Turning of 100Cr6 Steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209(11), 5068–5076. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, Y. C.; Jain, A.; Altan, T. A Finite Element Analysis of Orthogonal Machining Using Different Tool Edge Geometries. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 146(1), 72–81. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00846-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzakis, K. D.; Michailidis, N.; Skordaris, G.; Kombogiannis, S.; Hadjiyiannis, S.; Efstathiou, K.; Pavlidou, E.; Erkens, G.; Rambadt, S.; Wirth, I. Optimisatioin of the Cutting Edge Roundness and Its Manufacturing Procedures of Cemented Carbide Inserts, to Improve Their Milling Performance After a PVD Coating Deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 163–164, 625–630. DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00687-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, N.; Wu, Q. The Effects of Chamfered and Honed Tool Edge Geometry in Machining of Three Aluminum Alloys. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2005, 45(10), 1178–1187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Hrechuk, A.; Agmell, M.; Ahadi, A.; Stahl, J. E.; Zhou, J. FE Analysis on the Association Between Tool Edge Radius and Thermal-Mechanical Load in Machining Inconel 718. Procedia CIRP. 2021, 102, 91–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.09.016.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu, T. S.; George, A.; Kuriachen, B.; Mathew, J.; Dhanish, P. B. Experimental Investigations on the Wear Behaviour of Micro-EDM-Fabricated Textured Tools During Dry Turning of Ti6Al4V. Ind. Lubrication Tribol. 2022, 74(1), 26–33. DOI: 10.1108/ILT-06-2021-0233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, K.; Gao, J.; Ye, T.; Dai, X. Effect of Cutting Edge Radius on Cutting Force and Surface Roughness in Machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia CIRP. 2022, 108(C), 571–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.090.
   Google Scholar