Impact of next generation sequencing results on clinical management in patients with hematological disorders

References

• Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(22):2059–2074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, et al. Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2496–2506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Malcovati L, et al. Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2013;122(22):3616–3627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haferlach T, Nagata Y, Grossmann V, et al. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2014;28(2):241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida K, Sanada M, Shiraishi Y, et al. Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia. Nature. 2011;478(7367):64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter MJ, Shen D, Shao J, et al. Clonal diversity of recurrently mutated genes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2013;27(6):1275–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–2405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters BJ, Löwenberg B, Erpelinck-Verschueren CAJ, et al. Double CEBPA mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations, define a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with a distinctive gene expression profile that is uniquely associated with a favorable outcome. Blood. 2009;113(13):3088–3091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst T, Eyholzer M, Fos J, et al. Heterogeneity within AML with CEBPA mutations; only CEBPA double mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations are associated with favourable prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(8):1343–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou HA, Lin LI, Chen CY, et al. Reply to Heterogeneity within AML with CEBPA mutations; only CEBPA double mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations are associated with favorable prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(4):738–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green CL, Koo KK, Hills RK, et al. Prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in a large cohort of younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: impact of double CEBPA mutations and the interaction with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2739–2747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollink IHIM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Arentsen-Peters S, et al. Characterization of CEBPA mutations and promoter hypermethylation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2011;96(3):384–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falini B, Macijewski K, Weiss T, et al. Multilineage dysplasia has no impact on biologic, clinicopathologic, and prognostic features ofAMLwith mutated nucleophosmin (NPM1). Blood. 2010;115(18):3776–3786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omura GA, Moffitt S, Vogler WR, et al. Combination chemotherapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia with randomized central nervous system prophylaxis. Blood. 1980;55(2):199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Beyá M, Rozman M, Pratcorona M, et al. The prognostic value of multilineage dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics is dependent on NPM1 mutational status. Blood. 2010;116(26):6147–6148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacher U, Schnittger S, Macijewski K, et al. Multilineage dysplasia does not influence prognosis in CEBPA-mutated AML, supporting the WHO proposal to classify these patients as a unique entity. Blood. 2012;119(20):4719–4722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnittger S, Dicker F, Kern W, et al. RUNX1 mutations are frequent in de novo AML with noncomplex karyotype and confer an unfavorable prognosis. Blood. 2011;117(8):2348–2357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang JL, Hou HA, Chen CY, et al. AML1/RUNX1 mutations in 470 adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic implication and interaction with other gene alterations. Blood. 2009;114(26):5352–5361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendler JH, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, et al. RUNX1 mutations are associated with poor outcome in younger and older patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia and with distinct gene and microRNA expression signatures. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(25):3109–3118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaidzik VI, Bullinger L, Schlenk RF, et al. RUNX1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: results from a comprehensive genetic and clinical analysis from the AML study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(10):1364–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcovati L, Papaemmanuil E, Bowen DT, on behalf of the Chronic Myeloid Disorders Working Group of the International Cancer Genome Consortium and of the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Gruppo Italiano Malattie Mieloproliferative, et al. Clinical significance of SF3B1 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118(24):6239–6246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaemmanuil E, Cazzola M, Boultwood J, et al. Somatic SF3B1 mutation in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(15):1384–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcovati L, Karimi M, Papaemmanuil E, et al. SF3B1 mutation identifies a distinct subset of myelodysplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts. Blood. 2015;126(2):233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazzola M, Rossi M, Malcovati L. Biologic and clinical significance of somatic mutations of SF3B1 in myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2013;121(2):260–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michiels JJ, Tevet M, Trifa A, et al. 2016 WHO Clinical Molecular and Pathological Criteria for Classification and Staging of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Caused by MPN Driver Mutations in the JAK2, MPL and CALR Genes in the Context of New 2016 WHO Classification: Prognostic and Therape. Maedica (Buchar). 2016;11(1):5–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(4):424–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzeler KH, Becker H, Maharry K, et al. ASXL1 mutations identify a high-risk subgroup of older patients with primary cytogenetically normal AML within the ELN Favorable genetic category. Blood. 2011;118(26):6920–6929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzeler KH, Herold T, Rothenberg-Thurley M, et al. Spectrum and prognostic relevance of driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2016;128(5):686–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2209–2221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen D, Groves MJ, Burnett AK, on behalf of the Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party, UK, et al. TP53 gene mutation is frequent in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and complex karyotype, and is associated with very poor prognosis. Leukemia. 2009;23(1):203–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rücker FG, Schlenk RF, Bullinger L, et al. TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood. 2012;119(9):2114–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devillier R, Mansat-De Mas V, Gelsi-Boyer V, et al. Role of ASXL1 and TP53 mutations in the molecular classification and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemias with myelodysplasiarelated changes. Oncotarget. 2015;6(10):8388–8396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai CH, Hou HA, Tang JL, et al. Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30(7):1485–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel JP, Gönen M, Figueroa ME, et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(12):1079–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschka P, Döhner K. Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: can we improve on HiDAC consolidation? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:209–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen C, Hills RK, Lamb K, et al. The importance of relative mutant level for evaluating impact on outcome of KIT, FLT3 and CBL mutations in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2013;27(9):1891–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duployez N, Marceau-Renaut A, Boissel N, et al. Comprehensive mutational profiling of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2451–2459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdan E, Boissel N, Chevret S, et al. Prospective evaluation of gene mutations and minimal residual disease in patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(12):2213–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschka P, Du J, Schlenk RF, et al. Secondary genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16) or t(16;16): a study of the German-Austrian AMLStudy Group (AMLSG). Blood. 2013;121(1):170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89(6):2079–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120(12):2454–2465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejar R, Stevenson KE, Caughey BA, et al. Validation of a prognostic model and the impact of mutations in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(27):3376–3382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley RC, Saber W, Mar BG, et al. Prognostic mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(6):536–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshizato T, Nannya Y, Atsuta Y, et al. Genetic abnormalities in myelodysplasia and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: Impact on outcome of stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2017;129(17):2347–2358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejar R, Stevenson KE, Caughey B, et al. Somatic mutations predict poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(25):2691–2698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek L, Ferguson P, Metzner M, et al. Mutational analysis of disease relapse in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2016;1(3):193–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luskin MR, Carroll M, Lieberman D, et al. Clinical utility of next-generation sequencing for oncogenic mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(11):1961–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman SP, Archer KJ, Feng L, et al. Absence of the wild-type allele predicts poor prognosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and the internal tandem duplication of FLT3: a cancer and leukemia group B study. Cancer Res. 2001;61(19):7233–7239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiede C, Steudel C, Mohr B, et al. Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis. Blood. 2002;99(12):4326–4335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Ley TJ, Larson DE, et al. Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature. 2012;481(7382):506–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levis M. Midostaurin approved for FLT3-mutated AML. Blood. 2017;129(26):3403–3406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, et al. Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 Mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):454–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald MR, Levis MJ. FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibition as a paradigm for targeted drug development in acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2015;52(3):193–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DA, Faderl S, Cortes J, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate. Blood. 2004;103(12):4396–4407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, et al. Combination of hyper-CVAD with ponatinib as first-line therapy for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(15):1547–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konoplev S, Yin CC, Kornblau SM, et al. Molecular characterization of de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54(1):138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eghtedar A, Verstovsek S, Estrov Z, et al. Phase 2 study of the JAK kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with refractory leukemias, including postmyeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119(20):4614–4618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Fathi AT, et al. Molecular remission and response patterns in patients with mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia treated with enasidenib. Blood. 2019;133(7):676–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassereddine S, Lap CJ, Haroun F, et al. The role of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2017;96(12):1983–1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Fathi AT, et al. Ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with induction and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML with an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation is safe, effective, and leads to MRD-negative complete remissions. Blood. 2018;132(Supplement 1):560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiNardo CD, Stein EM, De Botton S, et al. Durable remissions with ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory AML. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(25):2386–2398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roboz GJ, DiNardo CD, Stein EM, et al. Ivosidenib induces deep durable remissions in patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2020;135(7):463–471.
   Google Scholar
• Perl AE, Martinelli G, Cortes JE, et al. Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1728–1740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jädersten M, Saft L, Smith A, et al. TP53 mutations in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) predict disease progression. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):1971–1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JäDersten M, Saft L, Pellagatti A, et al. Clonal heterogeneity in the 5q- syndrome: NPMc + and p53 expressing progenitors are insensitive to lenalidomide treatment and expand at disease progression. Blood. 2008;112(11):5104.
   Google Scholar
• Bejar R, Lord A, Stevenson K, et al. TET2 mutations predict response to hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Blood. 2014;124(17):2705–2712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19(1):4–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merker JD, Valouev A, Gotlib J. Next-generation sequencing in hematologic malignancies: what will be the dividends? Ther Adv Hematol. 2012;3(6):333–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braggio E, Egan JB, Fonseca R, et al. Lessons from next-generation sequencing analysis in hematological malignancies. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3(7):e127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman M, Warren EH, Wu CJ. Applications of next-generation sequencing to blood and marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(1 Suppl):S151–S160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez R, Ayala R, Martínez-López J. Minimal residual disease monitoring with next-generation sequencing methodologies in hematological malignancies. IJMS. 2019;20(11):2832. Published 2019 Jun 10.
   Google Scholar
• Kim T, Ho Moon J, Ahn J-S, et al. Next-generation sequencing–based posttransplant monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia identifies patients at high risk of relapse. Blood. 2018; 132(15):1604–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2488–2498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacher U, Shumilov E, Flach J, et al. Challenges in the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for diagnostics of myeloid malignancies into clinical routine use. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8(11):113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan O, Shrestha R, Cunich M, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing to improve cancer management: a review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Clin. Genet. 2018;93(3):533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh MF, Ritter DI, Kesserwan C, et al. Integrating somatic variant data and biomarkers for germline variant classification in cancer predisposition genes. Hum Mutat. 2018;39(11):1542–1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19(1):4–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morash M, Mitchell H, Beltran H, et al. The role of next-generation sequencing in precision medicine: a review of outcomes in oncology. J Pers Med. 2018;8(3):30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar