References
- Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy, Plans & Programs (ASD(OEPP)). (2012). Notification of updated guidance for the calculation of the fully burdened cost of energy in analyses of alternatives and acquisition programs (MEMORANDUM FOR SERVICE ACQUISITION EXECUTIVES COMMANDER, USSOCOM). Washington, DC.
- Bastian, N. D., & Trainor, T. E. (2010). Going green at West Point: Is it economically beneficial? A cost-benefit analysis of installing a wind farm at the United States military academy. Engineering Management Journal, 22, 12–20.
- DoD Energy Security Task Force (OUSD(AT&L)). (2008). Department of Defense report to Congress on energy security initiatives. Washington, DC.
- Fox, P. D. (1965). A theory of cost-effectiveness for military systems analysis. Operations Research, 13, 191–201.
- Howard, R. A. (2004). Speaking of decisions: Precise decision language. Decision Analysis, 1(2), 71–78.
- Hurwitz, D., Heaslip, K., & Moore, D. (2012). Relating transportation systems management and operations strategies to policy goals: A framework for quantitative decision making. Engineering Management Journal, 24, 32–42.
- Jezierski, K. (2009). Reliable, secure and efficient energy demonstrations (RSEED) at military installations, final report. Detroit, MI: NextEnergy.
- Julian, C., Lucy, T., & Farr, J. (2011). Commercial-off-the-shelf selection process. Engineering Management Journal, 23, 63–71.
- Noblis. (2010). Sustainable forward operating bases. Falls Church, VA.
- Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (OUSD(AT&L)). (2013). Contingency basing outside the United States (DoD Directive 3000.10). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
- Pera, M. E. L. (2005). The reality of the single-fuel concept. Army Logistician, 37(2). Retrieved from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/050300-concept.htm
- Qin, R., Grasman, S. E., Long, S., Lin, Y., & Thomas, M. (2012). A framework of cost-effectiveness analysis for alternative energy strategies. Engineering Management Journal, 24, 18–35.
- Ruppert, W. H., Bush, T. A., Verdonik, D. P., Geiman, J. A., & Harrison, M. A. (2004). Force provider solid waste characterization study, final report. Baltimore, MD: Hughes Associates, Inc.
- Schlesinger, J. R., & Carns, M. P. C. (2008). More fight—Less fuel (Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Energy Strategy Final Report). Fort Lee, VA: Army Combined Arms Support Command.
- Siegel, S., Bell, S., Dicke, S., & Arbuckle, P. (2008). Sustain the mission project: Energy and water costing methodology and decision support tool, final technical report. Johnstown, PA: Army Environmental Policy Institute.
- U.S. Army. (1990). Water supply in theaters of operations (Field Manual 10–52). Washington, DC: Department of the Army Headquarters.
- U.S. Army. (1997). Fuels and lubricants standardization policy for equipment design, operation, and logistic support (Army Regulation 70–12). Washington, DC: Department of the Army Headquarters.
- Wang, H. S., Spohn, K. M., Piccard, L., & Yao, L. (2010). Feasibility study of wind power generation system at Arctic Valley. Engineering Management Journal, 22, 21–33.
- Yaqub, M., Sarkni, S., & Mazzuchi, T. (2012). Feasibility analysis of solar photovoltaic commercial power generation in California. Engineering Management Journal, 24, 36–49.