Determining the Critical Factors of Radical Innovation Using an Integrated Model of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Fuzzy Kano With a Case Study in Mobarakeh Steel Company

References

• Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Linking operations performance to knowledge management capability: The mediating role of innovation performance. Production Planning & Control, 25(1), 44–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiwu, Z., & Hongjun, G. (2015). Fuzzy-valued linguistic soft set theory and multi-attribute decision-making application. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 89(August), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Alaei, A., Shafaee, J., Ariana, A., & Maghvan, T. S. (2012). The role of knowledge management in created organizational innovation. Journal of Basic & Applied Scientific Research, 2(2), 1136–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Alegre, J., Sengupta, K., & Lapiedra, R. (2013). Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 454–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. T., & Childe, S. J. (2013). Innovation: A knowledge transfer perspective. Production Planning & Control, 24(2–3), 208–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angle, H. L. (1989). Psychology and organizational innovation—Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, B., & Ceylan, A. (2009). Does organizational learning capacity impact on organizational effectiveness? Research analysis of the metal industry. Development & Learning in Organizations, 23(3), 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Baas, S. M., & Kwakernaak, H. (1977). Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica, 13(1), 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. F., & Guild, N. C. F. (1979). Comparison of fuzzy sets on the same decision space. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 2(3), 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Boender, C. G. E., De Graan, J. G., & Lootsma, F. A. (1989). Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 29(2), 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdag, C. H., Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2003). Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 51(1), 13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix, J., & Peters, L. S. (2015). The performance-improving benefits of a radical innovation initiative. International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 64(2), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu, K., & Park, S. Y. (2016). Are consumers in collectivist culture mostly indifferent to sports lesson programs?: A DAQ simulation on the Kano fuzzy model. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1656–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 17(3), 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunduchi, R. (2013). Trust, partner selection and innovation outcome in collaborative new product development. Production Planning & Control, 24(2–3), 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33(2–3), 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Mora, A., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2006). Using enablers of the EFQM model to manage institutions of higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(2), 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, M., Er, I. D., & Ozok, A. F. (2009). Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a technical innovation audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), 105–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. D., Hage, J., & Hull, F. M. (1988). Organizational and technological predictors of change in automaticity. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 512–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. (2000). Product innovation and technology strategy. Research Technology Management, 43(1), 38–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13(4), 675–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado‐Verde, M., Navas‐López, J. E., Cruz‐González, J., & Amores‐Salvadó, J. (2011). Radical innovation from relations‐based knowledge: Empirical evidence in Spanish technology‐intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5), 722–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggirala, M., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2008). Provider perceived dimensions of total quality management in healthcare. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(6), 693–722.
   Google Scholar
• Erensal, Y. C., Oncan, T., & Demircan, M. L. (2005). Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Turkey. Information Sciences, 176(18), 2755–2770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, L. A., & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 704–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo, A. T. L., Ng, Y. K., Lee, V. H., & Gan, P. L. (2012). The relationship between knowledge management practices and technological innovation: A conceptual framework. Journal of Management, Knowledge & Learning, 1(1), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Morales, V. J., Matías-Reche, F., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2011). Influence of internal communication on technological proactivity, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 150–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geramian, A., Mehregan, M. R., Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, N., & Hemmati, M. (2017). Fuzzy inference system application for failure analyzing in automobile industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, M., Arabzad, S. M., & Shahin, A. (2013). A novel approach for supplier selection based on the Kano model and fuzzy MCDM. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5469–5484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinet, J., & Pilat, D. (1999). Promoting innovation—Does it matter? Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development Observer, 2(217/218), 63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, J. T. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 597–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2009). Computing with words in decision making: Foundations, trends and prospects. Fuzzy Optimization & Decision Making, 8(4), 337–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 115(1), 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S., & Fallah, M. H. (2005). Drivers of innovation and influence of technological clusters. Engineering Management Journal, 17(3), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen, J.-A. (2009). A systemic approach to innovation: The interactive innovation model. Kybernetes, 38(1/2), 158–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, M., Cai, S., & Shin, H. (2006). TQM practice in Maquiladora: Antecedents of employee satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using FAHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Quality, 14(2), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (1978). Fuzzy theories on decision-making. A critical review. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof.
   Google Scholar
• Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koberg, C. S., Detienne, D. R., & Heppard, K. A. (2003). An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, V. (1998). Total quality management and its humanistic orientation towards organisational analysis. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2003). Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a FAHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 35(7), 619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebesgue, H. (1966). Measure and the integral. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-C., & Huang, S.-Y. (2009). A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano’s model. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 4479–4484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-R., Lin, C.-J., & Chu, C.-P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision, 46(7), 1002–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, A., Moenaert, R. K., & Jegers, R. S. (2013). Linking communication to innovation success in the financial services industry: A case study analysis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(1), 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Maravelakis, E., Bilalis, N., Antoniadis, A., Jones, K. A., & Moustakis, V. (2006). Measuring and benchmarking the innovativeness of SMEs: A three-dimensional fuzzy logic approach. Production Planning & Control, 17(3), 283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L., Ruan, D., & Herrera, F. (2010). Computing with words in decision support systems: An overview on models and applications. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(4), 382–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. M., & O’Connor, G. C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moch, M. K., & Morse, E. V. (1977). Size, centralization and organizational adoption of innovations. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 716–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari Zadeh, F. (2012). Recognizing influential factors in innovation success in Iran’s defense industries. Tehran, Iran: Education & Research Institute of Defense Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. L. (2002). Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: Adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 19(3–4), 221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, J., & Chang, H. J. (2015). Post-catch-up strategy for medium-sized South Korean firms: Improving technological capabilities by balancing R&D intensity and open innovation. Engineering Management Journal, 27(4), 164–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (2005). Innovation processes. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (Vol. 18, pp. 1–26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, C. D., Ozuna, A. A., & Arriaga, A. A. (2011). Clustering and innovation capabilities in the Mexican software industry. Engineering Management Journal, 23(4), 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, A., & Weerd-Nederhof, D. (2009). Successful patterns of internal SME characteristics leading to high overall innovation performance. Creativity & Innovation Management, 18(3), 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Rajak, S., Parthiban, P., & Dhanalakshmi, R. (2016). Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Ecological Indicators, 71(December), 503–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial & Corporate Change, 15(4), 653–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszkowska, E., & Kacprzak, D. (2016). The fuzzy saw and fuzzy TOPSIS procedures based on ordered fuzzy numbers. Information Sciences, 369(November), 564–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Moreno, A., Tamayo-Torres, J., & García-Morales, V. J. (2015). The role of QMS in the relationship between innovation climate and performance. Production Planning & Control, 26(11), 841–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2013). On the measurement of intangibles. A principal eigenvector approach to relative measurement derived from paired comparisons. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 60(2), 192–208.
   Google Scholar
• Sadikoglu, E., & Zehir, C. (2010). Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa, R., Hyland, P., & Ferrer, M. (2014). Technological innovation and operational effectiveness: Their role in achieving performance improvements. Production Planning & Control, 25(12), 969–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunila, M., Pekkola, S., & Ukko, J. (2014). The relationship between innovation capability and performance. International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 63(2), 234–249.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, A. (2004). Integration of FMEA and the Kano model: An exploratory examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(7), 731–746.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, A., Barati, A., Dabestani, R., & Khalili, A. (2017). Determining factors influencing radical and incremental innovation with a case study in the petrochemical industry. International Journal of Business Innovation & Research, 12(1), 62–79.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, A., & Mohammadi Shahiverdi, S. (2015). Estimating customer lifetime value for new product development based on the Kano model with a case study in automobile industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(5), 857–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin, A., Nikjoo, M., & Nilipour Tabatabaei, A. (2011). Designing L3Y2T model for analysis and prioritization of the innovation and agility factors. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(3), 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, A., & Pourhamidi, M. (2011). Service TRIZ: An approach for service quality design—With a case study in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Business Innovation & Research, 5(4), 291–308.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, A., & Sadeghbeigi, A. (2010). Innovation management. Isfahan, Iran: JD Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, A., & Zeinali, Z. (2013). Investigating the relationship between control factors and innovation performance in Isfahan Steel Company. International Journal of Innovation & Learning, 14(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., & Zaim, S. (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3396–3406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle, S., & Vázquez-Bustelo, D. (2009). Concurrent engineering performance: Incremental versus radical innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(1), 136–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermaak, K. J., & Steyn, J. (2014). Innovation strategy complexity and scope in automotive component manufacturing in developing economies. Engineering Management Journal, 26(3), 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, V. A., & Bouncken, R. B. (2011). How does cultural diversity in global innovation teams affect the innovation process? Engineering Management Journal, 23(4), 24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Kreng, V. B. (2007). Evaluation of knowledge portal development tools using a FAHP approach: The case of Taiwanee stone industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(3), 1795–1810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Houssin, R., Caillaud, E., & Gardoni, M. (2010). Macro process of knowledge management for continuous innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(4), 573–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yitmen, I. (2011). Intellectual capital: A competitive asset for driving innovation in engineering design firms. Engineering Management Journal, 23(2), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information & Control, 8(3), 338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975a). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II. Information Sciences, 8(4), 301–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1975c). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—III. Information Sciences, 9(1), 43–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar