A Comprehensive Approach to Dynamic Project Risk Management

References

• Altabbakh, H., Murray, S., Grantham, K., & Damle, S. (2013). Variations in risk management models: A comparative study of the space shuttle challenger disasters. Engineering Management Journal, 25(2), 13–24. doi:10.1080/10429247.2013.11431971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Center for Chemical Process, S. (2014). Guidelines for initiating events and independent protection layers in layer of protection analysis Retrieved from Ebook Library http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1895791
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism risk. Risk Analysis, 29(4), 587–600. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01175.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahill, A. T. (2010). Design and testing of an illuminance management system. ITEA Journal, 31(1), 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bahill, A. T. (2012). Diogenes, a process for identifying unintended consequences. Systems Engineering, 15(3), 287–306. doi:10.1002/sys.20208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Asher, J. Z. (2008). Development program risk assessment based on utility theory. Risk Management, 10(4), 285–299. doi:10.1057/rm.2008.9
   Google Scholar
• Bharathy, G. K., & McShane, M. K. (2014). Applying a systems model to enterprise risk management. Engineering Management Journal, 26(4), 38–46. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, B. S., & Blyler, J. E. (2016). System engineering management (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (1981). Systems engineering and analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, T. A., & Tippett, D. D. (2004). Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal, 16(4), 28–35. doi:10.1080/10429247.2004.11415263
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, A., & Bahill, A. T. (2014). Comparison of risk analysis approaches and a case study of the risk of incorporating solar photovoltaic systems into a commercial electric power grid. Systems Engineering, 17(1), 89–111. doi:10.1002/sys.21254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. A. (2008). What’s wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497–512. doi:10.1111/risk.2008.28.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N. C., & Rand, C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2010). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know ([Nachdr.] ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89–95. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00012-1
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming how organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, M. W. (2014). Enterprise risk management (1st, 2nd print ed.). Malvern, PA: The Institutes.
   Google Scholar
• Eveleens, J., & Verhoef, C. (2010). The rise and fall of the chaos report figures. IEEE Software, 27(1), 30–36. doi:10.1109/MS.2009.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldratt, E. M. (1990). Theory of constraints. Great Barington, MA: North River.
   Google Scholar
• Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710. doi:10.1016/10.1016/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00044-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INCOSE. (2015). Systems engineering handbook (4th ed.). INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04. San Diego, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. (1996). Delphi in depth. Berkeley, CA: Osborne McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Garrick, B. J., & Apostolakis, G. (1981). Advances in quantitative risk assessment–the maturing of a discipline. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 28(1), 944–946. doi:10.1109/TNS.1981.4331310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappelman, L. A., McKeeman, R., & Zhang, L. (2007). Early warning signs of it project failure: The dominant Dozen. Edpacs, 35(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/07366980701238939
   Google Scholar
• Katina, P. F., Ariel Pinto, C., Bradley, J. M., & Hester, P. T. (2014). Interdependency-induced risk with applications to healthcare. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 7(1), 12–26. doi:10.1016/10.1016/10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. L. (1986). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 64(2), 178.
   Google Scholar
• Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P., & Cozzani, V. (2014). Risk management of domino effects considering dynamic consequence analysis. Risk Analysis, 34(6), 1128–1138. doi:10.1111/risa.2014.34.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, P. T. I. (1999). A sectoral review of risks associated with major infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17(2), 77–87. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00017-9
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications Retrieved from //is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G. F., Feng, X. T., Feng, G. L., Chen, B. R., Duan, S. Q., & Chen, D. F. (2016). A method for dynamic risk assessment and management of rockbursts in drill and blast tunnels. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49(8), 3257–3279. doi:10.1007/s00603-016-0949-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk: A sociological theory. New York, NY: A. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Marszal, E. M., & Scharpf, E. W. (2002). Safety integrity level selection: Systematic methods including layer of protection analysis. Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society.
   Google Scholar
• Paltrinieri, N., Khan, F., & Cozzani, V. (2014). Coupling of advanced techniques for dynamic risk management. Journal of Risk Research, 18(7), 910–930. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.919515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennock, M. J., & Haimes, Y. Y. (2002). Principles and guidelines for project risk management. Systems Engineering, 5(2), 89–108. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, J. K., & Mantel, S. J. J. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4), 269–276. doi:10.1109/17.62322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. D., Eveleigh, T., Holzer, T. H., & Sarkani, S. (2013). Risk identification biases and their impact to space system development project performance. Engineering Management Journal, 25(2), 3–12. doi:10.1080/10429247.2013.11431970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichelt, K., & Lyneis, J. (1999). The dynamics of project performance: Benchmarking the drivers of cost and schedule overrun. European Management Journal, 17(2), 135–150. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00073-5
   Google Scholar
• Sage, A. P. (1992). Systems engineering. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slegers, N. J., Kadish, R. T., Payton, G. E., Thomas, J., Griffin, M. D., & Dumbacher, D. (2012). Learning from failure in systems engineering: A panel discussion. Systems Engineering, 15(1), 74–82. doi:10.1002/sys.v15.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sols, A. (2015). Balancing the global view with the relevant few in project management. Huntsville, AL: International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM).
   Google Scholar
• Standish-Group. (2015). The Standish Group Report CHAOS. Retrieved from https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/chaos-report.pdf, March 15, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations (1st ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Syed, M. (2014). Black box thinking. [Place of publication not identified]. New York, NY: John Murrey Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, K. T., & Ren, Y. (2009). Risk management capability maturity model for complex product systems (CoPS) projects. Systems Engineering, 12(4), 275–294. doi:10.1002/sys.v12:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuofa, T., & Ochieng, E. G. (2014). Project failure: The way forward and panacea for development. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 59–71. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p59
   Google Scholar